Jump to content

Habs Fan in Edmonton

Member
  • Posts

    4962
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    65

Posts posted by Habs Fan in Edmonton

  1. 12 minutes ago, GHT120 said:

     

    KK had a career year last season ... the idea (I-M-O) would be to give it a year and see what MSL can do with him ... *** IF *** necessary, a buyout next June would be 10 years, with 7 @ $841,333 but years 3,4&5 would be $461,333; right where an extra $380K could prove useful.

     

    The 'Canes have $30.7M to fill out 9-10 roster spots next season ... but they may want to re-sign Guentzel (especially if they have a good playoff run), their 2nd (Skjei), 3rd (Slavin) and 6th (Chatfield) leading TOI defencemen are UFAs, up-front, their #2(Jarvis) and #4 (Necas) scorers are RFAs and #6 (Teravainen) is a UFA ... that $30.7 may not go as far as one might think ... perhaps the proposal could be modified/expanded and bring one of the RFAs, or one of their young NCAA forwards and a lesser pick into a deal.

     

    That makes more sense. The Canes have a lot of tough decisions to make, a lot of UFA's, plus Jarvis and Necas will/should be getting substantial raises. Maybe some team should entice Jarvis or Necas with a 1 year contract at 6.1Million/year?

     

    Jarvis in particular should be getting a massive raise, 28 goals and 32 assists in 74 games and only making 894,000, hmmm....

     

    Surely Jarvis will get a bump to at least 4m (likely higher) as the compensation up to 4.1M is only a 2nd round pick. Carolina would have to match. 

  2. 25 minutes ago, dlbalr said:

     

    If the idea is to eventually do a buyout, that's a lot of dead money (even at 1/3) to eat for a late first-round pick. 

     

    Yes, is 12 years x 835,000/yr of dead cap space worth a pick in the 26 - 32 range?  I just don't see Carolina giving up on him yet. He has had a brutal year though, after a hot start he has basically 13 points in his last 60 games. It sure went downhill fast for him. Not sure what's going on, his confidence must be shot right now. 

  3. 6 minutes ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said:

     

    Different types of player, playmaker vs shooter. 

     

    I have a personal love for playmakers, as a fan. There’s something about that cerebral, high-vision use of the ice, and the unexpected pass that sails through three guys to land on the open man’s stick, that seems magisterial to me. But obviously, a pure shooter is pretty damned great as well.

     

    Matthews is, unfortunately, the best pure goal scorer of his generation and one of the best of all time. But McD is next level, because he has it in him to be an elite goal scorer too; he’s done it. He’s won the Richard Trophy FFS. 

     

    If you put McDavid and Matthews side by side and ask who you’d rather build a team around, EVERYONE in hockey except Toronto fans would pick McDavid. That’s not a shot against Matthews; it’s a tribute to McDavid.

     

    Good analysis, McDavid did score 64 last year so he can certainly do both. Matthews is obviously a great shooter but it just seems to me that there is something lacking in his game that never seems to get pointed out. A pure shooter. 

  4. 6 hours ago, Commandant said:

     

    McD is unbelievable.  Hes at 95 assists, and looks a lock to go over 100.

     

     

    He is incredible, he has 60 more assists than Matthews. They say the mark of a great player is that they make those around them better. McDavid does that. Now Matthews is an incredible shooter but does he make those around him better? It seems like 35 assists is not that impressive when you are a center and always surrounded by talented linemates. 

  5. At least Ottawa won and Winnipeg lost. Now if Winnipeg goes out in the 1st 2 rounds then that pick might be half decent. Their 1st round matchup will be really tough as it doesn't look like they win the division now. 

  6. 6 minutes ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said:

    Between the Chelios/LeClair/Roy/McDonagh/Sergachev trades, I'm pretty sure the Habs have a disproportionately outsized history of disastrous deals over the past 40 years.

     

     

    You bring back some sweet memories.  LOL  The McDonagh/Gomez trade is still a head scratcher. 

     

    Sather:  Bob, if you give me your best young defense prospect, I will let you have my worst contract. I know he makes 7.3M/year but he is a nice skater.

     

    Bob: Sounds good. Why don't I throw in Chris Higgins as well. I know he only scored 12 goals last year but he scored 20+ the previous 3 years and he plays both ends of the ice. 

     

    Sather: Let me think about that. OK, you got a deal. Happy to help you out Bob. 

     

    WTF   That trade in a salary cap world still boggles my mind. 

  7. 1 hour ago, GHT120 said:

    If they continue to rack up points, 9th / 10th might not be entirely out of the question.

     

    That is true. After this 3 game winning streak they are not far behind, Seattle and Calgary. 

  8. 11 minutes ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said:

     

    Savard was actually a very good GM, but that trade and the Chelios one -which was even worse - are huge blots on his copybook. 

     

    I think the only GM's out there that have never made a bad trade are GM's that are either:

     

    1) fairly new to the job  

    2) have never taken a chance

     

     

  9. I absolutely hated the Broad Street Bullies but that was a different time. The Flyers have been a huge surprise this year and Tortorella has done a fantastic job. I never thought they would be in a playoff spot this late in the year.  I won't lose any sleep if the Flyers take 2 points in regulation tonight. The Habs might have a bit of a hangover after a successful end to a long road trip but I won't sell them short either.  

  10. 6 hours ago, dlbalr said:

     

    It'd be nice but it'd also use one of the allowable two lottery advancement slots.  Teams are only allowed to move up I think twice in a five-year period now; would Montreal want one of them to happen without moving into the top two?  Considering the jump, I think they would but it's a factor to consider.

     

    They most certainly would take it but the odds of Winnipeg missing the playoffs are incredibly low. I was just dreaming a bit. 

  11. 7 hours ago, GHT120 said:

    Perhaps not for the Habs, but why would Carolina want Gallagher.

     

    I don't see why anyone would want Gallagher even at 50% retention. He will likely be for the rest of his contract what he is this year, a hard working, hard driving slow right winger who will give everything he has and score 8-12 goals a year, maybe 15 in a good year. 

  12. 2 hours ago, Prime Minister Koivu said:


    More rules that I didn’t know until now!

     

    Your hockey knowledge is amazing Commandant

     

    Yes, some very knowledgeable people on this board who I have learned a lot from regarding salary stuff, buyouts etc. 

     

    I decided to go to capfriendly to learn myself how it works. If you click on the player and then the line that says buyout contract, it breaks it down nicely for you. Didn't realize how cheap it would be to buy out KK although it is spread over a lot of years. 

     

     

    Jesperi Kotkaniemi Buyout Results - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps

  13. 3 minutes ago, Commandant said:

     

    Arizona is winning tonight and Ottawa has been winning lately too.

     

    Plus Seattle and Pittsburgh both won tonight as the Habs were starting to creep up on those teams. Habs will almost for sure be in the 5-7 spot before the lottery. They will get a good player regardless but the 5 spot would be nicer. 

  14. 27 minutes ago, sbhatt said:

    Feels like a solid draft position is slipping away.

     

    Yeah, I am not crazy about getting 2 points tonight either BUT it's been impressive how well they have played against some really good teams lately. It's starting to look like they have a solid goaltending tandem and they have a young mobile defense that's only going to get better. They just need more secondary scoring.  Progress is definitely being made. 

  15. 1 hour ago, tomh009 said:

    I'm quite OK with other people being excited about it now, and I'll get excited about it myself come draft day. But, for now, I'm not going to invest a ton of time learning about prospects that may never pull on the CH sweater. That's just me. 🙂

     

    And I'm still keenly following all our prospects, and especially those that might be joining the team for the final games of the season. That's excitement enough for me!

     

    That is a perfectly reasonable, rational and logical answer. I (and perhaps others) will get excited ahead of time for you and will speculate like crazy on who the Habs will/should draft. You can put your feet up and relax. You just might be the smart one here. LOL

  16. 1 hour ago, tomh009 said:

    I'm not going to get excited about any prospects (unless the Habs win the lottery) until they actually make the picks since we really don't know what Hughes will do.

     

    It's what fans (fanatics) do, we speculate and get excited about who the Habs may or may not draft then we may or may not get excited about who they actually do draft. What excitement would there be right now if we couldn't get a little excited about the upcoming draft?  The Habs aren't making the playoffs so there is no cup run to get excited about. 

×
×
  • Create New...