Jump to content

Peterpuck

Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Peterpuck last won the day on March 21 2023

Peterpuck had the most liked content!

Previous Fields

  • Favourite Habs
    Suzuki, Caufield, Matheson

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Saskatchewan

Peterpuck's Achievements

Initiation

Initiation (1/23)

3

Reputation

  1. Hi I've been a lurker for years. Would love to post more but I'm not incredibly tech savy and can't figure out how to quote somebody. Most of the time I lose interest based on this tbh
  2. We're so close to Mitchkov range after our losing streak tho. If Anaheim can eek out a few wins and pass us we have a legit shot with no lottery luck. I mean you know Bedard and Fantilli are going 1-2 because of the Russian factor. Would a team like San Jose take Mitchkov at 3 when they have players in their prime like Hertl and Couture when Mitchkov ain't coming until 2026? Seems there's more than one franchise talent and still multiple scenarios in play to land them
  3. For the most part agree about never bringing up an 18 y/o, unless it means playing them severely below their level in Junior- a la McDavid and Crosby in their draft +1. Hughes was talking about how this was purely a development year for Slaf tho, and that he didn't wanna send him down because then the results would guide his play rather than the process, which they wanted to significantly alter. What if they send him to Laval next year for the majority of the season? To me that's not rushing a prospect. If they do that they would be forgiven, and if I'm not mistaken they would be granted a slide year on his entry level contract if he plays less than 9 NHL games as he's still under 20 at the start of the year
  4. Great post, I've been constantly re-calibrating my expectations on these 4 myself. For one reason or another they all make you pump the brakes on getting hyped up, Hutson with his size, Mailloux with his playing time, and I have a hard time trusting QMJHL production on dominant teams. I have way higher hopes for the two defense prospects. St. Louis and Robidas have shown they can develop defense this year and Laval has done so too with Barron and Trudeau, so I'm a bit bullish on those two. It'll likely take a couple more years, but I'm hoping (and I think it's reasonable) for one bonified top 4 defender and another 4/5 type out of those two. Everything else is gravy IMO. The Q is so top heavy, those dominant teams always inflate individual scoring. I mean both Gatineau and Sherbrooke have +100 goal differentials. Not exactly a league with any parity. I'm not getting too excited about the Q forwards until they break the door down......Farrell on the other hand has me very interested
  5. How is Commandant's comment "irrelevant"? Sorry just chiming in to say I appreciate Commandants legal bit about what might hold up changing the draft age. Carry on
  6. I've been hoping Columbus would be weak enough they'd have no choice but to shop around their young veterans. Ryan Murray would be a perfect fit, I'd say to put him with Petry as a new bonified top pairing. He'd be a great LHD to bolster our PK as well. So far Columbus is better than expected though
×
×
  • Create New...