Zowpeb

Member
  • Content count

    1068
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Zowpeb last won the day on September 7 2013

Zowpeb had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

7 Neutral

1 Follower

About Zowpeb

  • Rank
    NHL Yearbook Cover

Contact Methods

  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Location
    Ontario, Canada, Earth, Milky Way
  • Interests
    Hockey: Habs<br />Baseball: Blue Jays<br />Football: J E T S<br />Basketball: Raptors<br />Soccer: Arsenal
  1. Unless Drouin and Galchenyuk both move to C...
  2. Yes, RNH is clearly better then Danault. I'd be okay with him being acquired if the deal doesn't cost much from our NHL roster...beyond that I think they'd just shuffle the deck chairs. I agree with those who said they'd rather see us make a move for a higher tier 1st line C...to me, that means planning a way to get Tavares when he hits UFA next year. I like Danualt and he can be a good player for this team but it's a travesty that he's being foisted into a first line role. It's time to give Galchenyuk and Drouin BOTH the chance to be playing Center this year...see which one is the better C by year end. Trade Plekanec and move Danault to 3rd line C to make that happen. If you can't trade Plekanec now then do so at the deadline... Either way, Pleks is coming off the books and clears up enough salary (assuming they don't do anything stupid in our remaining off-season) to make a run at Tavares next off-season. This is why I don't mind 1 year of Hemsky or trying to do a 1 year deal for a guy like Jagr. Sure, they become a place holder this season but I can live with that if it meant: Pacioretty - Tavares - Gallagher Galchenyuk - Drouin - Shaw?? (flip Galy and Drouin depending on who is the better C) Lehkonen - Danault - Byron Hudon - McCarron - They'd basically have around $10-11M a year to offer Tavares with Pleks gone and that's assuming they are needing to add a D-man for around $5M plus a couple minor RFA raises. Possibly that's not quite enough but it gets them in the mix...if they need to make some added room they could look to move Shaw's contract (would be REALLY nice if Scherbak forced his way into the mix as a RW ready replacement). Really, that's a very deep set of forwards with only RW being a minor weakness...and I don't see how it's not a real possibility given that it's only going after one UFA and they could have enough cap room.
  3. I think Hemsky is in the top 6 when healthy...I think Jagr would be a nice fit at this point. Sure it's cobbling together some older talent on short term deals but I think he'd be a nice asset this year. I'd like to see: Pacs-Drouin-Jagr Lehkonen-Chuck-Hemsky Byron-Danault-Gallagher trade Pleks for a little more cap relief and sign Markov. Next year use Jagr's and Hemsky's money from this year, and the Pleks savings, and make a big run at Tavares.
  4. You can't pick and choose to ignore the cap savings in your Rad/Sergachev for Drouin/Hemsky scenario. I'd take Drouin over Radulov in the line-up and for the future. I'd take Alzner over Emelin in the line-up and for the future. Those are both immediate and long term upgrades albeit incremental ones. Sure, we lost a very good prospect but we also saved $6M/year against our cap and have only used $1M of it (this year only) on Hemsky. That cap savings IS worth something. The FA pool may not be deep this year but this team is, effectively, about as good as last year with a bunch more cap room for the deadline OR to make a run at a big name FA next year (damn, I really wish we'd sign Tavares but I know that's wishful thinking). In general: The whining and crying is so over done by all the cry babies on here that's it's ridiculous. I was not a fan of Bergevin from the beginning but I don't see this off-season being all that bad. These are the same guys that would be crying about re-signing Radulov during his first slump and screaming to fire Bergevin. I don't hate the Leafs but I sure hate their fans...a bunch of people around here are starting to sound eerily like Leaf fans.
  5. I'm surprised at the lack of talk about Duchene and any possibility for the Habs.
  6. Signing

    You'd rather they don't sign any depth players for the minors? Every team does this every year. Calling fringe players "rejects" is pointless.
  7. If I'm Radulov a 6 year deal isn't great...he's 36 at the end and would likely get a poor 2-3 year offer at that time unless he's "ageless" in his performance. A 4 year deal makes sense because he could get another 4 year deal after that with more dollars per year then after a 6 year deal.
  8. Signing

    Gives depth for when Pleks is moved. Danault to 3rd line C behind Drouin and Galchenyuk. Sign Yakupov on the cheap and play him with Galchenyuk on 2nd line with Radulov. If Yakupov can't be reclaimed then Byron/Lehkonen is decent depth...and of course one of Galchenyuk or Drouin can also move back to LW. Pacioretty Drouin Gallagher Yakupov Galchenyuk Radulov Lehkonen/Byron Danault Shaw
  9. Signing

    Great signing that will also help to keep Price motivated to stick around. Even the contract structure looks good...at the end of year three he's also a trade commodity if they need to go down that path. I love Markov but wouldn't want to see him making over $5m a year and max a 3 year deal given his age and injury history. If that's too little for him then go another route. Also, Radulov's term request is ridiculous, can't believe people are wanting him signed for 6 years. 🙄
  10. GDT

    Have to believe there was a deal that didn't get done...why else stock up on so many extra players and clear up a bit of cap room? They aren't likely to say much about it but, to me, it seems pretty obvious they had a more impactful deal either fall through or not materialize. Perhaps it was Duchene but possibly someone else we weren't hearing rumors about...either way, they simply remained too far apart or another GM upped his asking trying to rape us at the 11th hour after MB made those moves. Just my guess.
  11. Julien ready to treat the remainder of the season like the pre-season with so many guys fighting for a shot.
  12. Agreed...I didn't really like the squad they selected for D. Their play in the tournament did not change my mind. Bouwmeester jumps out as a guy who simply should not have been on the roster. I swear he must have dirty pictures on folks running Hockey Canada. Vlasic and Muzzin weren't guys I would have picked... Subban and Seabrook deserved a place. You need that depth of talent precisely because guys like Doughty and Pietrangelo can have "off nights" too...frankly, they almost cost the game last night on multiple occasions. Sure, we won but it felt like we were trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
  13. Have to say that I thought Doughty was pretty terrible last night...he was just floundering at both ends of the ice.
  14. Hey DLBLR, I'm not sure I buy the "ease them into the spotlight" approach. The party doesn't stop and, if anything, is even more enticing to young players you want to develop. Sure, the media pressure may be a little less intense but there will be lots of folks trying to gain access to them for all sorts of reasons. JMHO. I'd love to get back into the SK pool again...I'll PM you if I can remember how...lol. Zow
  15. I know everyone seems to be in love with having the farm team close to home but I hate seeing the farm team in Laval. Doesn't do much to develop a fan base outside of the province, keeps the kids in the media spotlight, party atmosphere of Montreal, etc...