Jump to content

PMAC

Member
  • Content count

    1920
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

PMAC last won the day on September 24

PMAC had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

91 Excellent

About PMAC

  • Rank
    NHL Hall of Fame

Previous Fields

  • Favourite Habs
    Gallagher Markov,, Naslund, Dryden, Robinson, Gainey

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Sunny Brandon, Manitoba

Recent Profile Visitors

7709 profile views
  1. Mean is good when it is on your team and it is a “skill”that does not decline with age
  2. True, but I was hoping Bergevin could turn at least one of the excess assets into at least a late pick. Oh well
  3. What has Ouellet ever done to you? When we have injuries the more depth the better. I didn’t say I wanted him in a top six role in Montreal; I only said I hoped he wasn’t claimed so the team would have more depth in Laval
  4. I think he will be claimed. Hope I am wrong, if not it will be the third player lost for nothing this season
  5. Permanent Trade Proposal Thread

    I’m not saying that we should go all in, but if Mete for Muzzin accelerates the “re-set” it should be considered. Don’t get me wrong, the last thing I want the team to do is to make an ill-advised trade, but again it depends on where they see Mete’s ceiling, and most importantly— that their assessment is correct.
  6. Permanent Trade Proposal Thread

    I think it depends on how you value Mete. If he develops into a top 4 d maybe you are right. If not, maybe you make the deal. My crystal ball is foggy on Mete’s potential but it doesn’t seem that he has the offensive chops for top 2. Does the rest of his game push him into the top 4? If not, we have a plethora of 5-6 D men and they are not difficult to acquire if you need one.
  7. Permanent Trade Proposal Thread

    I stand corrected. I thought he had sat out
  8. Permanent Trade Proposal Thread

    Michael Faber suggested on TSN that the Canadiens should explore a deal like Mete for Muzzin. Muzzin is 29 and not ufa this year so how about: to LA Mete, a 4th and a prospect ( not named Brook, or Suzuki) to Mtl Muzzin
  9. Permanent Trade Proposal Thread

    Brodie was seriously out of favor with Calgary fans and was a healthy scratch earlier in the season. Has he worked his way back into the coaching staff’s good books?
  10. I just would have liked to see him get a few games in the NHL. I would be happily surprised if he isn’t claimed.
  11. Habs Defense

    Could we get a discount on Muzzin by taking Kovalchuvk back in a deal w/o LA retaining salary?
  12. Habs Defense

    If we trade Mete and Tatar then we have a forward depth problem to replace the LD problem. Far better to develop Mete unless Bergevin can do a Petry type deal at the deadline
  13. Habs Defense

    I agree that the d is not an area of strength but I don’t think that it will be the pitiful chaos that we have seen in recent weeks. Also, Schlemko is not our top left d and I am not sure that anyone other than Claude Julien thinks that he should get the first shot at playing with Weber. I would put Mete or Reilly there ahead of the Schlem, who, in the immortal words of noted Habs fan Shania Twain, “ don’t impress me much”.
  14. Habs Defense

    A lot has been written about the Habs defense lately— most of it negative, and deservedly so. However, I disagree with the idea that Weber’s presence on its own will not fix many of the team’s problems on D. The knock-on effects are enormous. Think about it: Alzner exiled Benn out of the top 4 Petry out of the top pair The addition by subtraction is in itself a massive upgrade. Now, if only Mete or Reilly could consistently play well with Weber and move Sclemhco to the bottom 6 or press box and all will be well.
  15. Brett Kulak recalled

    Apparently, Eric Engles and I both think waiving Alzner is the best of these options( as I said in a previous thread). https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/waiving-alzner-canadiens-make-room-weber-juulsen/
×