Jump to content

alfredoh2009

Member
  • Content count

    702
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

alfredoh2009 last won the day on August 28

alfredoh2009 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

87 Excellent

About alfredoh2009

  • Rank
    NHL Power Play

Previous Fields

  • Favourite Habs
    Gallagher, Pacioretty, Price, Juulsen, Lenkohnen, Mete

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Ottawa

Recent Profile Visitors

3479 profile views
  1. Could our lineup look like this

    That's a good evaluation, I am not arguing your points. I just want MB to squeeze as much possible from the assets he has to met as many draft picks as possible for next year, or even the year after. If any of the players that will be waived may bring that. Like Gallagher said in his interview with Stu Cowan: “Fifth-rounders. That’s the round to be in.” . Maybe we get another gem.
  2. Could our lineup look like this

    4-5 years, or the time until they need to clear waivers In the CH's place, a guy like Ouellet, are reclamation projects, i.e. busts, Shinkaruk, Delarose and McCarron (2013 drafts) are about to be branded late-bloomers or busts this season
  3. Could our lineup look like this

    It depends on what was expected of the player. Smith-Pelley, Sekac, Jerabek come to mind. Draft picks are hard to evaluate for me. I've seen references to ranking systems and a "factor of goals projected by player x" as a figure of merit which is a way to project expectations. But time wise, I think 4 to 5 years is about right
  4. Injury news

    Sucks for D-Lo Maynopen the door to: Shinkaruk, McCarron or Chaput heck, DLR may get a lease on life and even Suzuki may step up !
  5. Could our lineup look like this

    Because, the same way we got Byron, some teams will wait for the waivers to try to get guys like McCarron and Delarose. The teams I listed are teams for whom DLR would be an upgrade to their 4th line and Delarose may become a 3rd liner in another organization where he would feel valued. I just hope MB tries to get something instead of loosing these assets for nothing
  6. Could our lineup look like this

    Islanders, Flames?, Ducks, Penguins?, Black Hawks
  7. Could our lineup look like this

    Because the Canadiens are weaker on D, I think that they will go with 8 D, and only on extra Forward So fat at camp, there seem to be better options than Delarose and McCarron. If they keep Deslaurier up again, #25 and #34 should be dealt for draft picks instead of risking loosing them through waivers McCarron may clear, but I am not sure about that
  8. Sept. 17, Devils (SS) vs Habs, 7:30 PM

    I don't remember Chucky being slow, but you may be right. I think that one of the biggest differences is in how Domi understands what is expected of players in a market like Montreal: dedication, relentless work and playing to your full potential (not mailing it in) I think some of the talented players took for granted playing for Montreal and just milked the situation to their advantage without doing all possible to win This year, in to exhibition games, the team seems to have a hunger to win. I do not think Chucky showed that.
  9. Sept. 17, Devils (SS) vs Habs, 7:30 PM

    I think that the gamble is to use Domi at center who should be as lukewarm at center as Drouin but more defensive-responsible. But the payoff would be on getting more production out of Drouin. If in the pre-season it doesn't work, they go back to Drouin at center. Either way, they will be shielded as the second line IMHO
  10. Sept. 17, Devils (SS) vs Habs, 7:30 PM

    At least they didn't need the stretcher
  11. Could our lineup look like this

    Absolutely, it would be bad to loose one of the extra players at camp through waivers. Deslaurier, Delarose, Peca, Hudon, Agostino, Froese, Shinkaruk, McCarron, Chaput, Ouellet, Lernout, Valiev have to clear waivers The will need to trade at least two Forwards and one Defenseman by the end of camp
  12. Could our lineup look like this

    haha, I thought that you must have forgotten. It is tough putting together a team from so many players. I hav ebeen trying to keep Hudon in there, because he earned a spot last year and he is one of the few fracophones on the team. But this year it is getting tough
  13. Could our lineup look like this

    did you forget Tatar?
  14. Could our lineup look like this

    My Loose for Hughes lineup: Tatar-Danault-Gallagher Drouin-Domi-Armia Hudon-Plekanec-Lehkonen Byron-Peca-Scherbak Shinkaruk, (A.Shaw), Reilly-Petry Alzner-Juulsen Benn-Lernout Schlemko, Ouellet, (Weber) === Mete starets in Laval to develop. McCarron and Delarose are traded for draft pick(s) if they do not show any upside during training camp
  15. Sept. 17, Devils (SS) vs Habs, 7:30 PM

    I am glad they are putting Delarose on the 4th line to see if he wins his spot on the NHL roster: it's about time we light a fire under his feet I have a 3rd line of Hudon-Pleks-Lehkonen I am interested to see if Hudon can play on the RW Lehks is more comfortable on RW but this gives some options I am also glad they are playing Mete-Juulsen to see how they react looks like a interesting experiment at this point; to see how ready some prospects are
×