Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Commandant last won the day on December 5

Commandant had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1413 Excellent


About Commandant

  • Rank
  • Birthday 12/07/1981

Previous Fields

  • Favourite Habs
    Playoff PDO Bender

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

22523 profile views
  1. Yeah, he was definitely better than olofsson
  2. At the end of a winning streak, a team often wins one or two they should lose before things turn to crap. At the end of a losing streak, a team often loses one or two they should win before things turn around. Lets hope the second is what we've seen in the Boston game and tonight.
  3. They had chances, but Francouz stood on his head in the third.
  4. They played pretty well for most of the Boston game. THey played well against the Isles. NOw the are back to giving up the stupid odd man rushes all the time.
  5. Weber walked on the first goal. Petry walked on the second. What a garbage start.
  6. I'm no doctor, but that looks like a concussion. His head hit the glass.... then he fell on his head on the ice. I think the first impact might have knocked him out and he couldn't break his fall and kinda just fell like a ragdoll
  7. +/- is a terrible stat, and we will all be better off when people don't use it to compare players. I'm going to not compare Olofsson because we already looked at his stats and he's garbage. Let's deep dive look at the defencemen you mentionned. Reilly has a 61.01% offensive zone start percentage Kulak has a 63.46 Fleury has a 67.07 Petry has a 49.6% So.... Reilly, Kulak and Fleury are being sheltered about the same amount in terms of O-Zone starts, with Reilly's small sample size, the difference in Ozone starts is negligible. We see that all three are being used as third pairing guys when they play, and that Julien is sheltering his third pair (as he probably should). For comparison, Weber is at 48, Chiarot at 51 and Mete our lowest at 41 (meaning least sheltered). Reilly has a PDO of 1.006 (close to expected, but a slight touch on the "lucky" side) Kulak's PDO is 0.938 (very unlucky) Petry PDO is 0.973 (moderately unlucky) Fleury PDO is 0.977 (moderately unlucky) The PDO explains almost entirely the differences in plus/minus. In the small sample sizes, Habs goalies have come up with a higher save percentage than the opponent for Reilly, but haven't for the other three defenders. Kulak looks so bad because really goalies have been bad when they are on the ice. But we still can look farther... is there something any of these d are doing to create more scoring chances against their goalie than against the other team? Is that why the PDO is down? Let's look Reilly has a High Danger Chance of 45.59% (ie the other team gets more high danger chances when Reilly is on the ice than the Habs do) Kulak has a high Danger Chance 52.5% (habs get more high danger chances when he is on the ice then the other team does). Fleury has a high Danger chance of 38.84 (this surprises me and is a lot concerning) Petry 57.69 (no surprise, he is the best of these defencemen in this stat... cause Petry is Damn good, and he's doing this against tougher opposition and with shittier zone starts). Conclusions 1) Petry is a stud and shouldn't be in this comparison. he's head and shoulders above the other D. This shouldn't be a surprise, anyone with a good eye test could have told you that before I looked at that stats. The fact that the eye test and the stats are confirming each other, gives credence to the value of the stats. 2) Fleury might be being overused as a rookie and third pair RD could also use some improvement. This isn't solely a LD problem. This surprised me a little bit. That said, he's a rookie who should get better, and his only competition is Folin right now, and he's better than Folin. We've seen the Kulak-Reilly pair where one of them was on the right side, and that was very bad, and so playing them out of position is not the answer. Fleury is still probably our best bet on the right. 3) Kulak is better than Reilly despite the plus/minus differences. The Habs control the scoring chances much better when Kulak is on the ice vs Reilly. That said Reilly is better than Olofsson, so while Mete is injured, Reilly should be considered. However the team seems to want to give Leskinen a chance. Given that Reilly is a replacement level #7 D, this isn't a bad strategy as maybe a rookie can be better than replacement level. That said if Leskinen doesn't work, you can always go back to Reilly on the third pair. PS I didn't write down Chiarot's stats, but his stats show that he's been good. Not great, but good. (51% zone starts, 1.003 PDO, 58% HDCF)
  8. With Reillys stats, you also have to look at his zone starts cause he is usually sheltered
  9. Makes sense. He has played well and has earned a chance.
  10. Is Reilly improved... or have multiple shoulder injuries made Olofsson worse? Cause the Olofsson in Minnesota was a #6/7 NHL defenceman. The guy we have seen in the last 3 games.... (and yes its only 3 games).... was not close to NHL calibre. The Habs were essentially shorthanded when he was on the ice. I looked at the advanced stats the other day, and they are some of the worst I've ever seen. Just horrendous.
  11. I think KK has been playing his best all year in recent games. His game is already coming around.
  12. Saku needs a job in the organization. Make him a scout in finland if he wants to live at home but he should be part of something
  • Create New...