Hab faninTO

I say 5 months (Feb)! After that there won't be enough time for a season and playoffs.

Unbias does not mean that someone can’t be passionate/emotional. Someone can be unhappy about the opposition scoring but can still provide good commentary about the goal.

Commentators must be unbias. Their job is to comment on the game. A bias commentator does not communicate the events properly. I hate the American commentators because they are the worse but not the only ones. I find the French CBC - commentators to be the least bias and most professional. One more thing, why do commentators feel they need to be stand up comedians?

Habsfnnr, if you think that the odds are that the Fins will beat Cda you are thinking with your heart. Wan't to gamble?

Luongo was fighting the puck all night long. The entire team did not play well. Brodeur is the best by a good margin. Not only does he stop the puck but he exude (SP?) confidence and is the best puckhander.

Luongo was fighting the puck all night long. The entire team did not play well. Brodeur is the best by a good margin. Not only does he stop the puck but he exude (SP?) confidence and is the best puckhander.

Souray is worth $3MM! The reason he only got $3MM/yr is because he has not shown consistency. PS Theo should have been in goals for Cda. He had a better training camp than Luongo..

Uwey, you are right on!

Just happy the US is out and Koivu is in. Can't wait to watch the game on Tuesday. I'm worried for Cda because Luongo even though Luongo stopped a lot of rubber he did not look sharp on Saturday.

Traverse is less than marginal. He is not NHL material. Good luck to him.

If they (players/team) srcew it up bad enough maybe those team in the weak USA market might come back "home". Maybe it is not a bad thing if hockey does not grow to Gary B.'s vision. The game sucks right now because there is not enough talent to support 30 teams. Maybe a step back is a good thing. BUT this likely lockout is done at the expense of fans! Puzzled!

I hateTkachuk but his performance was extaordinary.

There is no ideal lines at this point since we do not know a lot but here is one idea: Bulis - Koivu - Kovalev Zednik - Ribeiro - Ryder Dowd- Bonk - Begin ???? - Sundstrom - Ward I think of all the potential young players that could come up and there style and i get bogged down. To properly develop an offensive talent they need to play on the first 2 lines. The prospects that are more of a defensive or grinder type can be insert in the 3rd and 4th line. I kind of like Bulis on the first line. I think Z can get a lot of goals with Robeiro. Robeiro is purely a set-up guy and Z is a pure scorer with a nice release. Who knows? Maybe not.

I though Canada played a GREAT 1st period. Than in the 2nd, Canada let the American get under their skin. I found the American were dirty, - running the goalie, hits from behind and more. Finally, Canada underperformed in the 3rd. I don't expect a ref to call everything but I perceived them to favour the US. These games are not meaningful and teams are using them to tweak their team but the reality is that US will not make it to the final with that team (less Modano).

Like other teams Montreal has a chance to win the cup but they are not contenders. Dynasty is defined as a team that wins a string of cups (was Detroit a Dynasty in the past 10 years?). A lot of teams make it to the cup final (win or lose) that were not contenders. Calgary, Anaheim, Carolina and Buffalo are/were not contenders. Montreal will be good this year (if the play) and will continue to get better as the young player mature. However, I would not define them as contender. Go Habs Go