-
Posts
12701 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
239
Posts posted by Trizzak
-
-
Mari...Mariusz...Cher...Czer.. that former habs will sign with the Leafs either Thursday or Friday, physical pending.
More opportunity for a habs to lay him out with a hard check.
-
I'd ask you to do the same thing for playoffs. Better picture of the players worth emerges
-
Also worth noting is he was a 42nd overall pick in 1996.
Though for what that's worth I don't know.
-
Mad Mike strikes again!
-
Breezer is gone. Who to boo next?
I'm gonna go with Rivet. He'll be the source of all the Canadiens problems, beat women, scorn children, and prevent world peace (all while twirling his mustache and stroking a kitten.)
Who do you think is next on the Habs fans shit list?
-
It was suggested but voted against by the owners, I do believe
-
I've heard that the salary is averaged out over the year span of the contract, and that number is counted against the cap, in which case 5.33 mill is correct.
-
I think Carey Prince will be just as good as Carey Price.
Someone's gonna be traded!
-
Originally posted by TrizzakOriginally posted by Habby1197
Theodore got 16 over 3 years.
4.5 this year
5.5 next year
6 in the final year of the contract.
http://www.rds.ca/canadien/chroniques/187032.html
[Edited on 2005/9/3 by Habby1197]
So what does that do to our cap room?
Isn't it the average overall, rather than 4.5 this year, 5.5 the next, etc etc?
http://www.ofeliamateescu.com/alin/nhl/can...anadienscap.asp
Where the site gets it's numbers I don't know, but it looks like the Habs are at 34,368,933, with 4,631,067 to spare.
-
Originally posted by Habby1197
Theodore got 16 over 3 years.
4.5 this year
5.5 next year
6 in the final year of the contract.
http://www.rds.ca/canadien/chroniques/187032.html
[Edited on 2005/9/3 by Habby1197]
So what does that do to our cap room?
Isn't it the average overall, rather than 4.5 this year, 5.5 the next, etc etc?
-
I read also (forgetting where) that he denied the No Trade Clause
-
Bring back the Stitches mask to the NHL (Gerry Cheevers if I recall correctly?)
-
I was surprised Dave Andreychuk decided to resign with the Lightning for 2 years.
I thought he would retire.
-
Mogilny probably isn't going anywhere, seeing as he just signed there.
Gomez might be an interesting addition, I just don't know where he'd fit.
-
I'm taking this game of Pick A Devil and making it just a bit more serious.
Info brought to you by TSN:
Martin Brodeur - $5,237,238
Brian Rafalski - $4.2 million
Patrik Elias - $4.18 million
John Madden - $3,861,561
Vladimir Malakhov - $3.6 million
Alexander Mogilny - $3.5 million
Jeff Friesen - $2.28 million
Scott Gomez - $2.2 million
Dan McGillis - $2.2 million
Viktor Kozlov - $1.746 million
Colin White - $1.71 million
Jamie Langenbrunner - $1,655,130
Sergei Brylin - $1.52 million
Richard Matvichuk - $1.368 million
These are the top money makers for New Jersey.
Their cap is currently $43,748,929.
Obviously a trade like Bonk for Friesan doesn't work because the salaries are too close. So what's a fair trade for both teams, but lowers the Devils overall salary?
You don't have to knock them all the way down to below the cap, and certainly don't knock us over ours.
-
I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!!
LOUD NOISES!!!
-
That's okay Berge.
Just another reason to see your avatar
-
Originally posted by Bulis_the_Habbie
I don't understand you people!
If he's "most likely" going to surprise us than it's not much of a surprise is it?
That reminded me of a George Carlin bit on Self Help books.
"If you're looking for help, why would you read a book written by someone else? That's not self help, that's help. There is no such thing as self help. If you did it yourself, you didn't need help. You did it yourself! Try to pay attention to the language we've all agreed on!"
-
Originally posted by PMAC
Toronto should sign him: They could from a line with Bure, Lindros and Allison and call them the medical marvels
Nah, bring back Lindros's brother instead and call them the Concussion Crew.
-
If someone leaves I bet it'll be for a pick. When Ryder and Theo sign we'll be one or two players over the roster limit. But I don't expect it'll happen until after training camp/pre-season games.
-
Higgins. I just like what he brings to the table
-
Washington is picking up half his contract, so really the Rangers are only paying a bit more than 4 mill against their salary cap.
-
http://www.hockeysfuture.com/article.php?s...hreaded&order=0
Odd that Hainsey has completely dropped off the face of the earth...
Edit: Why I put this under NHL I have no idea.
Today might be a good day to stop sniffing glue
[Edited on 2005/8/29 by Trizzak]
-
Originally posted by Leafs Suck
Eklund has officaly lost his mind:
As for the crazy three-way Toronto trade that is out there...
Toronto Gets: G Roberto Luongo + D Jay Boumeester
Florida Gets: C Mats Sundin + First Round Pick
the Toronto turning around
Tampa Bay Gets: G Ed Belfour + 3rd Round Pick
Toronto Gets: F Brad Richards
And Last but not least has
Toronto Gets: G Mathieu Biron or G Mika Noronen ( Most Likely Noronen)
Buffalo Gets: D Ken Klee
[Edited on 2005/8/26 by Leafs Suck]
Worth noting is that Eklund himself said these rumours are complete crap. Something like a Eminus5 rating.
A Closer Look
in Habs & Hockey Talk
Posted
I think your ratings are too high.
Not enough proven scorers to warrant an A- for offense, B or B-.
Our Defense is adequate, C+.
Theodore hasn't played two good seasons in a row yet, and no one knows how Danis will play at NHL level, B-.
Size? (I'm guessing you mean physical players.) Dude, 5 of the 8 guys listed in your first paragraph are minor leaguers. Only one of them will make the Habs this year. Yes, the team is bigger than last year, (Bonk, Kovalev, new goon) but not by much. However, your rating is almost spot on (in my opinion,) B- for the optimist, C+ for the pessimist.
Depth we mostly agree on. D depth is practically nonexistent, and this years draft didn't help that. Offensively and...Goaltendingly...I agree with you. But I'm going with a B+
Total: B-. We aren't an A team. An A team finishes top 4 in their conference, and I don't see that happening for the Habs. Now take your same ratings and apply them to the team a year or two from now and I'm betting they'll be more accurate.