Dan Jancevski signed by Tampa Bay

[Bacchus 0]

We lost one of our D prospects ... one that many thought would be battling for a spot on the roster for number 6-7 D next season.

http://www4.sportsnet.ca/nhl_signings_2007/

[ShortHanded 0]

We lost one of our D prospects ... one that many thought would be battling for a spot on the roster for number 6-7 D next season.

http://www4.sportsnet.ca/nhl_signings_2007/

I could be wrong, but I vaguely remember Gainey saying he expected him to sign elsewhere...

[cfposi 0]

I don't know if he can be considered a prospect...we didn't draft him.

[simonus 0]

I don't know if he can be considered a prospect...we didn't draft him.

we didnt draft beauregard, cote, or danis.

[cfposi 0]

I don't know if he can be considered a prospect...we didn't draft him.

we didnt draft beauregard, cote, or danis.

Ok...let me clarify...Aside from the point that we didn't draft him, it was always my impression that he was picked up mainly to help develop the younger guys in Hamilton. I don't think anyone expected him to crack the lineup (with the exception of injury call-ups).

[simonus 0]

that was generally my understanding as well. Essentially I agree with your restatement insofar that drafting is not dispositive of prospect status.

[saskhab 8]

Yeah, they only briefly considered him as an injury fill-in and nothing more. TB probably thinks he'll be their #7 d-man because they have a couple of openings there. Battling Rogers and Janik for a top 6 spot.

[cfposi 0]

that was generally my understanding as well. Essentially I agree with your restatement insofar that drafting is not dispositive of prospect status.

Lol...I agree, lets notarize and move on to the next topic.

well-put

[JMMR 92]

Oh well too bad time to move on.

He did help the devlopment of Obryne very much for this I am happy.

[JoeLassister 400]

Oh well too bad time to move on.

He did help the devlopment of Obryne very much for this I am happy.

Yeah but he was getting old anyway. Won't miss him.