BTH Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 I suppose it could include one of these guys: http://www.hockeysfuture.com/prospects/sven_baertschi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habsfan Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 I heard that he was traded for Brassard in COlumbus...but RDS has just confirmed that Camms has been traded to Calgary...for whom, we still don'T know! Bourqye You're kidding? right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hab29RETIRED Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 I think Calgary has to trade $ to make this deal happen. That means one of their lousy deals - Stajen, Jokinin, Bourque, Bouwmeester, plus numerous other dumb contracts. We are screwed, we are friggin screwed. Why the friggin hell didn't molson fire PG!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Another winger. LMAO Useless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlbalr Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Bourque for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trizzak Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 There isn't anyone on the Flames current roster that is the least bit appealing, that they would trade of course. Hopefully it is for picks/prospects, otherwise this is horrible news. They need to take back salary if it's Calgary. No cap space. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hab29RETIRED Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Damphousse is right: at least they acted. Let's see what happens here. At least they acted????? Like Houle acted in dealing Roy????? Damphousse of all people should know better - friggin idiot!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 McKenzie reporting he's heard Bourque + as well. Least we get bigger. #silverlining? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habsfan Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Bourque for sure. NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted January 13, 2012 Author Share Posted January 13, 2012 Rene Bourque. ###### right off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTH Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Bourque + so far is what I've heard. That's probably it. If it's any consolation, Calgary fans on HFboards seem to hate the idea of that trade straight up.. But I don't think many Habs fans would like it either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlbalr Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Wouldn't be surprised to see Stajan as salary ballast here though one would think the Habs would get extra compensation for taking his deal on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Well, looks like we're getting the Swedish Chef. Bork Bork Bork Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlbalr Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Renaud Lavoie suggesting it's a 1-1 deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hab29RETIRED Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Bourque for sure. Great, a streaky, lazy player, takes dumb penalites and is targeted as a repeat offender. IF people on this fight complain about AK46, wait till you see Bourque. AK46 is at least a physical player when he isn't scoring. Bourque is the invisible man. Every friggin day, the papers here in Calgary complain about Bourque. Unless we also get a 1st rounder, dumb, dumb, dumb trade!!! Feaster already has said he isn't going to move first rounders, so we lose. FXCK I hate the managment of this team. Why the fxck can't we ever get decent management???????? Should appease the friggin french media. Bourque is not french, but has a french name. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTH Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Jay Onrait just announced it - Cammi for Bourque straight up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted January 13, 2012 Author Share Posted January 13, 2012 There better be more than just Bourque. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hab29RETIRED Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 That's probably it. If it's any consolation, Calgary fans on HFboards seem to hate the idea of that trade straight up.. But I don't think many Habs fans would like it either. Which calgary boards are your reading???? The media here hates Bourque. Although 3 years ago, everyone was pissed at Cammy for doing nothing in the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Straight up? Surely not. Must at LEAST get a pick back. Or Gauthier must be shown the door. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlbalr Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 There's salary relief if nothing else. One small consolation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hab29RETIRED Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 There better be more than just Bourque. doesn't sound like it. Bourque is signed until 2015. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athlétique.Canadien Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 I also heard Jay Onrait say it's straight up. Cammy for Bourque Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMMR Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 doesn't sound like it. Bourque is signed until 2015. But smaller cap hit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habsfan Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 If its the beginning of the end, and the Habs are looking to rebuild from scratch, I don'T understand how this could be viewed as a good trade for the Habs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seb Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Bourque + holland + 2nd vs Cam + Ramo + 5th Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.