Jump to content

Nov. 5, Boston vs Montreal, 7:30 PM


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

So just thought I would let everyone know, Mete is leading all Habs defenceman in goals scored for the season. Who would of imagined that?

I want a mete empty netter for the hatty  

The Bruins are in town, riding an eight-game winning streak but also coming off a hard-fought win against the Penguins. The Habs will need their "A" game for this one.     Canadien

Finally a call that’s borderline in our favour. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, sbhatt said:

Price sucks, and the team cannot maintain intensity for the duration of a game.  Bad combination.

 

I wouldn't say he sucks ... but as an elite goalie, I would have expected him to save two or three of the Boston goals.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, tomh009 said:

 

I wouldn't say he sucks ... but as an elite goalie, I would have expected him to save two or three of the Boston goals.

 

Two weak goals against in a big rivalry game...sucks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

C’mon boys. This is a great game. But only because we are winning. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got lucky with that offside call, and neither goalie was amazing.  Can't believe Mete didn't shoot for the hattie on that breakaway, some poor schmo in the crowd would have had to marry his girlfriend as per his sign.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Neech said:

Can't believe Mete didn't shoot for the hattie on that breakaway, some poor schmo in the crowd would have had to marry his girlfriend as per his sign.

 

I think Mete's work with Tim Turk is really paying off -- especially now that Mete has broken his duck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Boston 15 Games 56 goals

Toronto 16 games 56 goals

Montreal 15 games 56 goals 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, dlbalr said:

Interesting...

 

 

Chiarot was asked post-game about the reasoning behind the new pairing. He said the idea was to put two defensemen that aren't fun to play against (Weber and Chiarot) against the Bruins' best line.

 

I didn't get to watch much of the game so I have no opinion on if it worked, but it's definitely ballsy to put your 2 worst skating defensemen on the ice against Marchand-Bergeron-Pastrnak and thinking, "Well they'll definitely be paying the price when they cross our blueline."

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

40 minutes ago, Trizzak said:

Chiarot was asked post-game about the reasoning behind the new pairing. He said the idea was to put two defensemen that aren't fun to play against (Weber and Chiarot) against the Bruins' best line.

 

I didn't get to watch much of the game so I have no opinion on if it worked, but it's definitely ballsy to put your 2 worst skating defensemen on the ice against Marchand-Bergeron-Pastrnak and thinking, "Well they'll definitely be paying the price when they cross our blueline."

 

This and the Danault line worked brilliantly.  I havent looked up the 5v5 advanced stats tonight but my feeling is that the danault line won their matchup against Bergeron and it wasnt particularly close (other than on faceoffs)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...