TheAussiePosse Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 ... That only has players who haven't played for the Montreal Canadiens, but are in Montreal's organization. In other words, what you think Hamilton's starting line-up will be, with a tweak. Here's an example: Perezhogin-Plekanec-Balej Shasby-Archer Michaud Simple enough. Give it a go. BTW, now that I look at HF, our defense looks pale in comparison to our offence. We have 2 full forward lines of forwards rated 7+/10, but only 2 D. I guess Markov counts as a young player, so that's 3 D, but then so does Ward, which makes almost 3 full forward lines of 7+/10 players. I have a hunch that we'll aquire a young defensemen, particularily a prospect D, before the start of the 2003 season. Fair enough? [Edited on 2003/7/2 by TheAussiePosse] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlbalr Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 Aussie, Michaud HAS played for Montreal, filling in for a period 2 years ago vs Edmonton. My lineup would have to be: Perezhogin-Higgins-Ryder Archer-Shasby (only because these are the only 2 that haven't played for us-even Descoteaux has) Puurula (only he and Tarasov are eligible) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAussiePosse Posted July 3, 2003 Author Share Posted July 3, 2003 I guess my first idea was a bit constricting. So instead, it'll be the starting lineup for Hamilton. Ryder-Higgins-Milroy Hainsey-Beauchemin Michaud ___________________________________________ Where's the Bulldog's Smilie? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.