Jump to content


Welcome to HabsWorld!

Welcome to the HabsWorld Forums, a community for fans of the Montreal Canadiens.

Registration is free and only takes a moment to complete. New members are always welcome; join the discussion today! Click here to create your account.

Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

Tidbits from today's presser


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

#1 dlbalr

dlbalr

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,970 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario

Posted 07 January 2013 - 05:46 PM

Earlier this afternoon, Bergevin, Molson, and Therrien met with the media.  Here are some of the tidbits I can remember:

 

- Galchenyuk will be invited to camp (Collberg won't which evidently surprised some).

- Galchenyuk isn't pencilled into a spot on the team, day-to-day evaluation for him.  Per Therrien, the minimum ice time to keep him would be 12 minutes per game.

- The Habs intend to have 25-30 players in camp (and Gomez will be one of them), they'll start discussing who tonight (Hamilton plays tomorrow so their scratches could be a giveaway as to who gets the nod).

- Bergevin has been scouting a lot of QMJHL games this year.

- Nokelainen (back) will not be available for the start of camp.

- Rumours of Plekanec's injury are getting overblown, it's minor and he will be ready for camp.

- The Habs will be doing something for the fans but they haven't decided on what yet.

- Bergevin spoke with Don Meehan (Subban's agent) today, will begin negotiations for Subban's contract tomorrow.

- Therrien said the Habs' system involves them playing "on their toes."  I still don't know what that means.

- 3 keys of training camp: Players' timing, players' conditioning, and the new system.

 

Not a whole lot of ground breaking stuff, a lot of the questions were loaded for Molson to criticize Bettman and the lockout which he obviously danced around. 


  • 0

#2 DON

DON

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,351 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:British Columbia
  • Favourite Habs:Tinordi, Pateryn

Posted 07 January 2013 - 06:58 PM

Who thought Collberg would be at camp? a bit unrealistic.

Can Galchenyuk and Subban both fit under the cap?

 

Will Weber be waived and pass through to play with Bulldogs?


  • 0

#3 Chris

Chris

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,564 posts
  • Favourite Habs:Any one who hustles or finishes checks.

Posted 07 January 2013 - 07:01 PM

I beleibve he means the team will be more aggressive, on your toes, moving forward.

 

As opposed to be on your heels which means sitting back. Martins system.

 

Just guessing


  • 0

#4 dlbalr

dlbalr

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,970 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario

Posted 07 January 2013 - 07:11 PM

Who thought Collberg would be at camp? a bit unrealistic.

Can Galchenyuk and Subban both fit under the cap?

 

Regarding Collberg, it came up in a couple of questions.  As for both of them being under the cap, it'd be tight.  Presumably, some of the full season bonuses on Galchenyuk will be unattainable now which, at the end of the season, would lower his cap hit to something more manageable.


  • 0

#5 hab29RETIRED

hab29RETIRED

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,319 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary
  • Favourite Habs:Pleks, Markov, Price, Subban, MaxPac, Gally squared. All-time faves are Dryden, Lafleur, Robinson, Savard, Gainey (the player - Hate the GM), Roy, Chelios, Muller & Saku

Posted 07 January 2013 - 07:40 PM

Earlier this afternoon, Bergevin, Molson, and Therrien met with the media.  Here are some of the tidbits I can remember:

 

- Galchenyuk will be invited to camp (Collberg won't which evidently surprised some).

- Galchenyuk isn't pencilled into a spot on the team, day-to-day evaluation for him.  Per Therrien, the minimum ice time to keep him would be 12 minutes per game.

- The Habs intend to have 25-30 players in camp (and Gomez will be one of them), they'll start discussing who tonight (Hamilton plays tomorrow so their scratches could be a giveaway as to who gets the nod).

- Bergevin has been scouting a lot of QMJHL games this year.

- Nokelainen (back) will not be available for the start of camp.

- Rumours of Plekanec's injury are getting overblown, it's minor and he will be ready for camp.

- The Habs will be doing something for the fans but they haven't decided on what yet.

- Bergevin spoke with Don Meehan (Subban's agent) today, will begin negotiations for Subban's contract tomorrow.

- Therrien said the Habs' system involves them playing "on their toes."  I still don't know what that means.

- 3 keys of training camp: Players' timing, players' conditioning, and the new system.

 

Not a whole lot of ground breaking stuff, a lot of the questions were loaded for Molson to criticize Bettman and the lockout which he obviously danced around. 

 

This is Therrien we are talking about.  He could actually literally mean them playing on their toes! :bonk:


  • 0

#6 hab29RETIRED

hab29RETIRED

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,319 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary
  • Favourite Habs:Pleks, Markov, Price, Subban, MaxPac, Gally squared. All-time faves are Dryden, Lafleur, Robinson, Savard, Gainey (the player - Hate the GM), Roy, Chelios, Muller & Saku

Posted 07 January 2013 - 07:43 PM

Who thought Collberg would be at camp? a bit unrealistic.

Can Galchenyuk and Subban both fit under the cap?

 

Will Weber be waived and pass through to play with Bulldogs?

i'm really tired of losing young dman for nothing through waivers.  i say give him a real chance to play DEFENSE, none of the forward/defense hybrid role Martin had him playing.  Then make a call.  At least try and pick him up for a draft pick.  I can't see him passing through waivers.


  • 0

#7 The Chicoutimi Cucumber

The Chicoutimi Cucumber

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,086 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver
  • Favourite Habs:PK. Pleks. Gallagher. Price. All-time? SAINT PATRICK!!!!

Posted 07 January 2013 - 08:08 PM

This is Therrien we are talking about.  He could actually literally mean them playing on their toes! :bonk:

 

I thought the same thing :lol:


  • 0

#8 Toronthab

Toronthab

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,761 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto
  • Interests:philosophy, tennis, golf
  • Favourite Habs:Each in his own particular way

Posted 07 January 2013 - 11:28 PM

Head..shoulders heels and toes heels and toes....

 

I am pretty happy the millionaires came to an agreement. Now .. if we can just tax them all at appropriate levels for social justice.... we can have some more happy poor folks too!

 

Hi guys.


  • 0

#9 Commandant

Commandant

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,523 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario
  • Favourite Habs:Carey Price

Posted 07 January 2013 - 11:57 PM

 

Regarding Collberg, it came up in a couple of questions.  As for both of them being under the cap, it'd be tight.  Presumably, some of the full season bonuses on Galchenyuk will be unattainable now which, at the end of the season, would lower his cap hit to something more manageable.

 

 

With the cap being 70 million in year 1 and if Galchenyuk is on the team then Leblanc isn't.... so yes they both fit.


  • 0

#10 DON

DON

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,351 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:British Columbia
  • Favourite Habs:Tinordi, Pateryn

Posted 08 January 2013 - 12:01 PM

i'm really tired of losing young dman for nothing through waivers.  i say give him a real chance to play DEFENSE, none of the forward/defense hybrid role Martin had him playing.  Then make a call.  At least try and pick him up for a draft pick.  I can't see him passing through waivers.

Cant think of many lost that way, 1 after last lock-out.

All i am thinking, is with Diaz-Bouliion already basically locked in as #6 and #7 d-men, can the Habs afford to have up to 2 d-men sitting in pressbox? It is too bad Weber hadnt signed a 2 way deal, but by next fall he could be 10th on depth chart and Habs already went though on trade deadline without trading him, so i assume little interest?


  • 0

#11 Trizzak

Trizzak

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,984 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario
  • Favourite Habs:P.K Subban

Posted 08 January 2013 - 01:09 PM

Cant think of many lost that way, 1 after last lock-out.

All i am thinking, is with Diaz-Bouliion already basically locked in as #6 and #7 d-men, can the Habs afford to have up to 2 d-men sitting in pressbox? It is too bad Weber hadnt signed a 2 way deal, but by next fall he could be 10th on depth chart and Habs already went though on trade deadline without trading him, so i assume little interest?

 

Rumour is there was a deal in place at the deadline but it fell through. Perhaps someone got their 1st choice instead?


  • 0

#12 hab29RETIRED

hab29RETIRED

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,319 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary
  • Favourite Habs:Pleks, Markov, Price, Subban, MaxPac, Gally squared. All-time faves are Dryden, Lafleur, Robinson, Savard, Gainey (the player - Hate the GM), Roy, Chelios, Muller & Saku

Posted 08 January 2013 - 02:40 PM

Gainey also lost Hainsey and beauchimin on waivers as well.

Cant think of many lost that way, 1 after last lock-out.
All i am thinking, is with Diaz-Bouliion already basically locked in as #6 and #7 d-men, can the Habs afford to have up to 2 d-men sitting in pressbox? It is too bad Weber hadnt signed a 2 way deal, but by next fall he could be 10th on depth chart and Habs already went though on trade deadline without trading him, so i assume little interest?


  • 0

#13 Trizzak

Trizzak

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,984 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario
  • Favourite Habs:P.K Subban

Posted 08 January 2013 - 03:59 PM


Hi guys.

 

Hallooo!


  • 0

#14 DON

DON

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,351 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:British Columbia
  • Favourite Habs:Tinordi, Pateryn

Posted 08 January 2013 - 04:16 PM

Gainey also lost Hainsey and beauchimin on waivers as well.
 

yes, Beauchamin was the guy i was thinking of and Hainsey wasnt anything to lose sleep over neither. And Weber just dosent seem to fit with Habs needs, but yes it would be nice to somehow get a pick for him.


  • 0

#15 hab29RETIRED

hab29RETIRED

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,319 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary
  • Favourite Habs:Pleks, Markov, Price, Subban, MaxPac, Gally squared. All-time faves are Dryden, Lafleur, Robinson, Savard, Gainey (the player - Hate the GM), Roy, Chelios, Muller & Saku

Posted 08 January 2013 - 10:22 PM

yes, Beauchamin was the guy i was thinking of and Hainsey wasnt anything to lose sleep over neither. And Weber just dosent seem to fit with Habs needs, but yes it would be nice to somehow get a pick for him.

I'd take Hainsey over Kaberle. If we had him or Beauchiain, we also wouldn't have had to waste picks on Schneider because a lack of defensive depth.

 

It seems like since Savard traded Chelios, we have been in a mode of giving up on giving away young dmen for little, now or lousy return (Chelios, Desjardins, Beauchimin, Hainsey, McDonough).  Hopefully the pattern doesn't continue with Subban.  I want him here until he retires.


  • 0

#16 Commandant

Commandant

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,523 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario
  • Favourite Habs:Carey Price

Posted 08 January 2013 - 11:09 PM

Did you watch Hainsey last season?


  • 0

#17 l<OV4L3V

l<OV4L3V

    NHL Role Player

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 613 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Favourite Habs:Pacioretty, Emelin, Subban

Posted 09 January 2013 - 12:36 AM

Ron Hainsey is a bum and Beauchemin is pretty poor defensively? the only good piece out of those 4 is McDonaugh. otherwise, they can all get bent. subban will ink its just a matter of financials at this point.


  • 0

#18 The Chicoutimi Cucumber

The Chicoutimi Cucumber

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,086 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver
  • Favourite Habs:PK. Pleks. Gallagher. Price. All-time? SAINT PATRICK!!!!

Posted 09 January 2013 - 12:07 PM

Beauchemin had some very strong years in Anaheim as a bad-assed all-around defender - we really, really could have used him for a few years there. Hainsey, meanwhile, carved out a decent career for himself as a useful second-tier offensive defenceman in the same vein as Patrice Brisebois. Neither of them would be much use to us at this stage in their career, but they'd have been helpful options in their primes, and the attempt to deny this is just self-delusion. Beauchemin in particular is yet another example of an utterly wasted asset. 


  • 0

#19 Machine of Loving Grace

Machine of Loving Grace

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,940 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario
  • Favourite Habs:Bokondji Imama

Posted 09 January 2013 - 12:13 PM

Beauchemin had some very strong years in Anaheim as a bad-assed all-around defender - we really, really could have used him for a few years there. Hainsey, meanwhile, carved out a decent career for himself as a useful second-tier offensive defenceman in the same vein as Patrice Brisebois. Neither of them would be much use to us at this stage in their career, but they'd have been helpful options in their primes, and the attempt to deny this is just self-delusion. Beauchemin in particular is yet another example of an utterly wasted asset. 

 

Agreed.  They would have also made the team a lot better in 05-06 and 06-07.  Definitely would not have missed the playoffs in 06-07.  But ah well.


  • 0

#20 DON

DON

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,351 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:British Columbia
  • Favourite Habs:Tinordi, Pateryn

Posted 09 January 2013 - 12:32 PM

I'd take Hainsey over Kaberle. If we had him or Beauchiain, we also wouldn't have had to waste picks on Schneider because a lack of defensive depth.

 

It seems like since Savard traded Chelios, we have been in a mode of giving up on giving away young dmen for little, now or lousy return (Chelios, Desjardins, Beauchimin, Hainsey, McDonough).  Hopefully the pattern doesn't continue with Subban.  I want him here until he retires.

You do realize how long ago Chelios was traded?

I wasnt a Desjardins fan at all, even with his hat trick.

Beachamin couldnt even play with leafs and was sort of lock-out waiver that maybe was unavoidable?cant really remember.

Hainsey is an OK player, but closer to a flop as 13th pick.

 

No arguement about McDonagh, but that was just a bad trade.


  • 0

#21 Zowpeb

Zowpeb

    NHL Stanley Cup

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,039 posts
  • Location:Ontario, Canada, Earth, Milky Way
  • Interests:Hockey: Habs<br />Baseball: Blue Jays<br />Football: J E T S<br />Basketball: Raptors<br />Soccer: Arsenal

Posted 09 January 2013 - 03:20 PM

Head..shoulders heels and toes heels and toes....

 

I am pretty happy the millionaires came to an agreement. Now .. if we can just tax them all at appropriate levels for social justice.... we can have some more happy poor folks too!

 

Hi guys.

 

Yeah...cause the >46% marginal tax rate isn't good enough...lmao.

If you have an income level that qualifies you as "rich" then you pay more then your fair share of taxes across this great country...even moreso in provinces like Quebec.

 

I hope to god they find a way to keep Gomez off the team and that Galy finds a way to play himself onto the club in a meaningful role.

 

Frankly, I'm still hoping the Habs find a way to set themselves up for another strong draft this year, even at the expense of what is effectively a write off season in my mind.  Sure, there will be a playoffs and champion but if there is another year worth having a bad one then this is it...short season, lots of already pissed off fans and, after last years draft, the team is close to turning around a re-building effort very quickly...I guess the only positive to Gomez potentially making the club is that he sucks and will help to that end.


  • 0

#22 johnnyhasbeen

johnnyhasbeen

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,192 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Halifax
  • Interests:Jager, Guitar, Hockey, Old Fast Cars, Young Fast Women.
  • Favourite Habs:Pacioretty, Emelin, Price, Subban!!

Posted 09 January 2013 - 05:40 PM

lol, start the "Ruin for Drouin" thread now! Maybe that is "We ain't winnin' for MacKinnon"


  • 1

#23 DON

DON

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,351 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:British Columbia
  • Favourite Habs:Tinordi, Pateryn

Posted 09 January 2013 - 07:28 PM

lol, start the "Ruin for Drouin" thread now! Maybe that is "We ain't winnin' for MacKinnon"

 

Good one sir

 

Drouin is likely the next Eberle-type player

 

I would prefer drafting Drouin, but with a healthy roster and Price, even Gomer couldnt drag the Habs down to a top ten pick.

 

Realistic choices will be of the mid 1st round, Shinkaruk-Mantha-Pulock-Morrissey quality, which are all super prospects also and having 3 2nd round picks aint too bad neither, so no crazy need to tank when already drafting 4 of top 60 kids to add to last years haul. William Carrier-Nick Petan- Eric Comrie would be in that 30-60 range and nice additions.


  • 0

#24 Machine of Loving Grace

Machine of Loving Grace

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,940 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario
  • Favourite Habs:Bokondji Imama

Posted 09 January 2013 - 10:00 PM

If Mantha is available definitely. 


  • 0

#25 Commandant

Commandant

    NHL Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,523 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario
  • Favourite Habs:Carey Price

Posted 09 January 2013 - 10:36 PM

Beauchemin had some very strong years in Anaheim as a bad-assed all-around defender - we really, really could have used him for a few years there. Hainsey, meanwhile, carved out a decent career for himself as a useful second-tier offensive defenceman in the same vein as Patrice Brisebois. Neither of them would be much use to us at this stage in their career, but they'd have been helpful options in their primes, and the attempt to deny this is just self-delusion. Beauchemin in particular is yet another example of an utterly wasted asset. 

 

Beauchemin I agree would have been useful, very useful.

 

Hainsey was an asset, but less so due to negatives about his game (he was immature when he left, and had defensive deficiencies).


  • 0