Jump to content

habscout

Moderators
  • Posts

    1751
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by habscout

  1. 6 hours ago, Trizzak said:

     

    Juulsen's headaches could explain the interest in Honka (I mean, other than Bergevin's default interest in literally every bottom 4 defenseman out there.)

    Too bad about Juulsen and McCarron. I hoped both would have strong exhibition seasons.  Juulsen is really starting to concern me.

     

    About Honka, he has a good offensive package and the Stars are relatively deep on defence.  However I have heard his defensive game is lacking, and he's prone to coughing up the puck at the worst times.  If that news is accurate then it makes more sense the Stars would be willing to move him along while his value is somewhat higher. As such I would rather see the Habs let one of their own defensive prospects get a shot before they trade for Honka and knock them all down one run on the depth charts.  Aside from Juulsen the regulars on defence are healthy so there's less incentive to gamble on Honka now.  Either some other team will take a chance on him before the season starts. Or the Habs (or another team) will pick him up on waivers likely in the first few months. Since Honka is starting his 4th NHL season, he's waiver eligible if he's sent down to the minors. 

  2. I debated signing up then took the plunge during a Black Friday sale.  It is worth it, even at full price ( I am over 1 1/2 years subscribing now).  As someone said the daily coverage is very good, similar to what the Gazette used to be durng the hay days of the Habs (1950's through 1970's)

     

    I used to be a faithful Hockey News subscriber for many years but found I did not read much of the non-Habs stories so it felt like a waste.  With the Athletic, if you follow a team in another major sport then they have beat writers covering them. So you get more value from it in my opinion.

  3. 22 minutes ago, Meller93 said:

    Do you think Caufield will do any growing? I mean could he be a 5’10 forward by the time he makes the teams or does he seem like someone who basically tops out at 5’7

     

    Hard to say if he will grow much; perhaps a little.  His brother is almost 2 years older and a little bigger at 5'8", 173 pounds.  On draft day when they announced the Habs selection and showed Cole with his family, his brother looked somewhat bigger than Cole.

     

    I am pretty happy with the Habs picking Caufield.  They have not gone for a highly skilled player like this in a while, when they have not been drafting in the top 3.  He's a pure goal scorer, very shifty, but he's not a selfish one as I have watched several videos where he has dished the puck off to a linemate when he could have easily taken the shot.  Yes he benefited from playing on the same line as Jack Hughes, but he also scored when Hughes was at the U-18 tournament.  He could be top line player eventually for the Habs. I have no doubt he will play at least 1 year in college, since he's going to the same one his brother is at. He may leave after 2 seasons, similar to what Poehling did, who also wanted to play college hockey with his brothers, and did so for three seasons before turning pro.

  4. Here are some depressing stats.   

     

    The Habs have scored only 16 goals in the 8 games they have played so far in March. 

    They have allowed 26 goals against during that span. 

    Their record is 3 wins and 5 losses. 

  5. 12 minutes ago, titanfan said:

    Thompson and Weale were also terrible.  And I mean terrible.  Bring back Hudon and Peca.

     

    Sorry, I'm frustrated as hell.  Habs deserved a better outcome.  Problem is there are too many floaters.  As good as the Habs were at time tonight, they were terrible at other times.  Drouin really stood out for bad play tonight.  Shaw and Lehkonen just had bad luck as they both worked hard.  KK got hurt.  Danault looked good.  Domi and Gallagher were, well Domi and Gallagher. 

    I somewhat agree; however I saw a few good shifts by Weal tonight.  

     

    You used the wrong word with "deserve".  They outshot Chicago 2 to 1, but the Blackhawks had some key scoring chances, and obviously capitalized.

    • Upvote 1
  6. 12 minutes ago, Commandant said:

     

    Small with average but not great skating has never been Timmins M.O. with 1st or 2nd round picks.  I doubt we take him.

     

    Yeah well skating is not everything, unless you have hockey sense too, which IMO Debrincat has in spades. That's another short-sightedness the Habs have had with *many* of their past draft selections under Timmins, although the last couple of drafts they have improved in that area.

     

  7. 16 minutes ago, DON said:

    You think they would of picked him, exactly as Hawks did?

     

    Why not?  He was highly touted but just too small to be a first round pick.  The second round is the perfect time to "gamble" on a small OHL forward that has scored 100+ points in 2 straight seasons before his draft year.  Sure he was on Connor McJesus line, but still he managed to produce, and then he scored even more the year after McJesus graduated to the NHL.

  8. 10 minutes ago, Toronthab said:

    That's the best comparison I can think of too. And rightly or wrongly I put it down to Bergevin's attitude towards the players that Markov and Radulov mentioned. No relationship. 

    I would not compare it to the Leafs Ballard regime, which was a meddlesome, micro-managing owner of a Steinbrenner/Yankees level, who was only in the NHL ownership game to make money and headlines with his own name.  

     

    Bergevin just does not know how to handle the contract negotiation side of this sport in my opinion.  Radulov was low balled, although it was likely he was going to leave for a more tax friendly option.  With Markov, I believe he would have resigned for close to the same salary but he was deliberately low balled [half?] because Bergevin was dealing with Markov without an agent between them.  With respect to Drouin, that time he drastically overvalued the asset.  That contract was the time to negotiate a bridge deal, but instead he paid much higher than I believe any arbitrator would have awarded a player with *only 1* good NHL season.  The result we see now, is a under performing Drouin who will never live up to his long term salary, instead of giving him a shorter term "show me" contract to make him earn his pay.   

×
×
  • Create New...