Jump to content

Neech

Member
  • Posts

    4503
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    42

Posts posted by Neech

  1. 2 minutes ago, Dalhabs said:

    He has alot of hype not only for fighting.

    I think there is a big risk he will never have as high value in a trade as now. Doesnt meant we have to trade him though.

    Yeah, if he pans out to be just a bottom pairing plug then we'll have missed out on a decent return. I'd rather bet on him though. It would be awful to see him thrive somewhere else.

  2. Wow, we have the worst goalie pool in Canadian hockey history (I thought Demko was Canadian for some reason). Only Sweden perhaps of the top 5 nations has it worse at the moment. Helps to have the reigning Cup winner though, and it's a short tourney where you only need to get hot for 3 elimination games.

    • Like 1
  3. 11 hours ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said:

     

    Tocchet HATED Kuzmenko. He was nothing but dead cap space as far as the Canucks were concerned. I think that might be the key prism for understanding this deal. If you see Kuzmenko as a legit top-6 W, 30-goal scorer, then certainly the Canucks overpaid. If you see him in the way we see Josh Anderson, then the trade starts to seem pretty reasonable for the Canucks as contenders who are “going for it.”

     

    The main thing is that they did not give up their top organizational prospects. Instead they lose a good prospect, a low-grade prospect, the #30-32 overall pick, AND gain $5 mil in salary space by dumping perceived-dud Kuzmenko - in return for a rental that they think is the missing piece in solidifying their top-6, and who might become a tolerable Plan B in the disastrous event that they can’t lock down Pettersson. 

     

    All that being said, if I’m a Canucks fan, I find Lindholm’s numbers at age 29 and his reputed salary demands of $8-9 million to be quite worrisome. He’s not a guy I’d want the team to sign long-term.

     

    Classic deadline deal. But yes, if this sets the market, then things do look good for Monahan.

     

    Seems kind of crazy to see a guy with 39 goals and 74 points in his one full NHL season as Josh Anderson. Those are first line numbers that Andy has never even sniffed. Also, the first round pick will only be #29-32 if the Canucks make the conference finals.

     

    I'd get trading this haul for a future core piece, but a rental on a down year is questionable and could look pretty bad down the road.

  4. 32 minutes ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said:

    The first Deadline Domino falls https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/flames-agree-to-trade-elias-lindholm-to-canucks/

     

    Seems like a big return on a rental who is having a poor season, but then again the 1st will be a very late 1st; don’t know much about the prospects, but Canucks chatter doesn’t seem to see Jurmo as much good. 🤷‍♂️

     

    Seems like a HUGE return, bodes well for Monahan. I guess the Canucks had to unload salary with Kuzmenko and Tocchet didn't like him, but being a salary filler throw in on a deadline deal is a poor outcome for him IMO. Calgary should be able to flip him for more assets.

  5. 46 minutes ago, Commandant said:

     

    Why are all russians off limits?  They preferred Reinbacher over Michkov but drafted Bogdan later.  I dont know we have enough evidence to say that this management is anti russian.

     

    True enough, we'll see if they use a high value pick on a Russian rather than a late-rounder. My complaint was more about the general anti-Russian bias of this era, where Russians have been passed over and excluded. Demidov doesn't seem to be on our radar based on the previous posts in this thread. Michkov would have gone before Will Smith fifteen years ago. 

     

    30 minutes ago, GHT120 said:

    But it is such an easy/simplistic compliant ... don't take it away from him.

     

    Lol this catty personal shot is out of nowhere.

  6. I'd love to take a flyer on Kakko as a two-way middle-6 winger. He'll probably never live up to his draft position but it seems like he has a lot of positive qualities that will eventually result in production. Sort of like how Lekhonen seemed snakebitten for years until things came together (obviously I'd hope Kakko would be better offensively than Lekky).

     

    Maybe we could get him in exchange for Monahan and a 2nd?

  7. Some mock drafts have 3 Russians in the top 5, and it's a shame that they're probably all off limits to us. Demidov might be the second best forward in the draft and will probably fall to us just like Michkov did.

  8. 27 minutes ago, Habs Fan in Edmonton said:

     

    That's possible but this year there are a lot of highly rated defensemen in the top 10 which may push some of the forwards down.  I guess it will depend on what the teams drafting ahead of the Habs are looking for.  

    I feel like Eiserman with his scoring ability and Lindstrom with his scoring and size will go quickly. Those are the two I put above the rest at this point (this will likely change by June). I hope you're right and that at least 2-3 defensemen make their way into the top 5.

  9. 30 minutes ago, sim.on said:

    Catton, Lindstrom, Eiserman, Iginla, Helenius or Other?

     

    I'm assuming we'll be picking 4-9 range 

    Out of these I'm most excited about Eiserman and Lindstrom at this very early stage.

  10. Sens are creeping up the standings and may finish ahead of us yet.

     

    I'll wait till we have a roster actually capable of competing at the NHL level before judging Marty. For now, he seems to be doing a good job at development. Hopefully we come out of another lost year with some more forward talent in the system.

  11. 39 minutes ago, Habs Fan in Edmonton said:

     

    It also looks like a lot of good defensemen available which means hopefully a top notch forward falls to the Habs.  Losing to San Jose at home, although only 1 game, makes one think a bottom 10 finish is definitely in the cards. 

     

    Craig’s List: Dominant defencemen set to take over 2024 NHL Draft | TSN

     

    We're already in position for a bottom 10 finish, but we have the 5th worst goal differential. I'd feel good about our pick if it landed at #5-6.

×
×
  • Create New...