Chris Posted December 16, 2011 Share Posted December 16, 2011 I hate when people blame the refs. The bottom line they habs didn't get 1 call. The had NUMEROUS PP's including 5-3's and couldn't produce anything. The powder puff defense simply can't out muscle anyone to clear the crease for Price. They were all tap in goals after the Flyers just knocked defenseman out of the way. Cammi and Pleks are just brutal out there, if you want to kill a players momentum, put him on a line with those 2. Put AK46 with Eller and Leblanc. Pur Darche with Pleks and Cammi as a checking line. I wonder what JM was thinking with Blundeen and Leblanc, "great job guys, you won a faceoff, drove the net, each scored a point, your night is through, hit the showers". That's pathetic. How about rewarding someone who produces? They played hard, PP was terrible, defense zone was really bad, they didn't give up alot of shots, great scoring chances though. If thye can beat the Devils it's still a decent week. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted December 16, 2011 Share Posted December 16, 2011 Yeah the refs gave us some penalties... they gave the flyers a lot of PPs too. Of the penalties on the flyers, how many were bad calls? That one handed slash in the third period? Thats probably about it. The rest were deserved. But what good is a PowerPlay if the ref is gonna disallow the PP goals? Then they allow two goals by the flyers that have the same in the crease goalie interference. Don't get me wrong... its not all on the refs, but its not like we can deny they were a factor; when they played a huge role in 3 of the goals. What was goalie interference seemed to change depending on what team was doing it. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DON Posted December 16, 2011 Share Posted December 16, 2011 the only factor ref played was giving Habs lots of PPs, the no-goal call was a fair one and Ref#28 was actually OK for a change, a couple ticky tack ones both ways but no impact on game. a couple turnovers and shitty PP (when 14 and 13 were on it anyways). But was a fun and entertaining game and nice to see the team not give up. Scotty Bowman was correct again and failure on a 5 on 3 is just a Killer (why 72, 51 and 67 were not on more ?) A bunch of young guy and Cole were great, and Yemelin was back hitting everything that moved. Martin must not of liked Leblanc getting a standing O? and stapled his and Blunden's ass to bench for scoring? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted December 16, 2011 Share Posted December 16, 2011 If the disallowed goal call was correct, how was the zoljsahhahrek goal allowed to count with ronaldo committing worse interference? If you want to play to the letter of the law, that's fine pleks goal shouldn't count. But if you want to call that, call it both ways. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.