Chris Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 Yes, no reason to play Price tomorrow, give him the day off. If you can't score more than 1 against Phoenix you don't deserve any points. Let the team win a game. Tokarski is fine. Good news is back to back shutouts and played pretty well, bad news only 2 goals in 2 games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machine of Loving Grace Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 Crazy goalie battle. Both sporting shutouts but only Price walks out with the doughnut remaining. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habsfan Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 i kinda feel bad that i'm complaining(seeing as our boys are winning), but we need to find a way to score more goals. Carey can't get shutouts in every game! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlbalr Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 Since there's no GDT for tomorrow yet, I'll post this here. Louis Domingue is expected to start for the Coyotes tomorrow. Yeah, I'm starting Tokarski if it was up to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machine of Loving Grace Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 i kinda feel bad that i'm complaining(seeing as our boys are winning), but we need to find a way to score more goals. Carey can't get shutouts in every game! The past two games were serious goalie battles. I think the Habs looked good in both. We just had the better goalie, and honestly, the best goalie in the league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DON Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 Price must be #1 save% now, as he was tied with Renni before game. And his GAA must be almost sub-2.0. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DON Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 Habs on a 114 point pace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toronthab Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 What a goalie. I watched it on delay on the DVR so I couldn't join you guys here, but kudos to the team for a really hardfought effort again today. And once again, thank you so much Mr Gainey for your priceless legacy that keeps on giving. Great move sir. On another note, saw that great Montreal Canadian, Patrice Brisebois, the Montreal born true hockey player. He's in Dollard des Ormeaux (Dollard was himself a great hero saving Montreal with a few teen-aged friends from a massed Irooqois army) celebrating local hockey culture and still expressing his gratitude for the example of that saint on ice, Jean Beliveau. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DON Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 6:10 for Subban on the PK today!! Holy crap! Last year he barely played a few seconds PK/game. He is only getting better and better all the time! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlbalr Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 Apparently, the last time a team won back-to-back 1-0 games with the same goalie and same goal scorer in each game was back in 1954 (Toronto). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xXx..CK..xXx Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 Apparently, the last time a team won back-to-back 1-0 games with the same goalie and same goal scorer in each game was back in 1954 (Toronto). Cool stat until the end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCHabnut Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 So a lot of people who wants a 3-2-1 scoring system, would like this win to be worth the same as a shootout. I'm sorry, but that was a team win worth full points. My patent pending 2-1-0 scoring system which nobody embraces would give us a full win there. 2 points for a win as a team (regulation or OT) 1 point for a shootout. (Devalues the shoootout, but satisfies the need for a winner. 0 points for losing. (Well ya) I really believe this system would keep stat tracking fairly constant and force teams to play for the win as a team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCPetit Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 Let me add this: nobody talks anymore about who we should have traded to the Blues... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCHabnut Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 I was never on that bandwagon. I was on the "wtf is Gauthier thinking?" Bandwagon when he traded for a prospect with 7 games experience. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hab29RETIRED Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 Ditto. But that was my reaction to most of PG's moves - Kaberle, cammalari in game trade, coaching firings just before game time I was never on that bandwagon. I was on the "wtf is Gauthier thinking?" Bandwagon when he traded for a prospect with 7 games experience. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DON Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 Cant say I hate Subban's edginess with Krieder and then Leich/Wilson and if he can get under skin of opponent is smart. Thomas Sekac Eller is an interesting line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCPetit Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 I was never on that bandwagon. I was on the "wtf is Gauthier thinking?" Bandwagon when he traded for a prospect with 7 games experience. I was never on that bandwagon. I was on the "wtf is Gauthier thinking?" Bandwagon when he traded for a prospect with 7 games experience. Let's face it: Halak did not have much value. Price was much more valuable back then, even if he had his share of problems. His potential was known across the league, and we know why today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machine of Loving Grace Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 Bruce Garrioch thinks Bergevin is interested in Mike Green. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeLassister Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 So a lot of people who wants a 3-2-1 scoring system, would like this win to be worth the same as a shootout. I'm sorry, but that was a team win worth full points. My patent pending 2-1-0 scoring system which nobody embraces would give us a full win there. 2 points for a win as a team (regulation or OT) 1 point for a shootout. (Devalues the shoootout, but satisfies the need for a winner. 0 points for losing. (Well ya) I really believe this system would keep stat tracking fairly constant and force teams to play for the win as a team. You're not alone on this one. I embraced this system since the beginning. Exactly what I'd like it to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KoRP Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 You're not alone on this one. I embraced this system since the beginning. Exactly what I'd like it to be. I would rather have this, rather than the 3 points for a win system... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illWill Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 I don't care what system is in place as long as each game awards the same amount of points. It makes zero sense for one game to hand out 2 points to a team and another to hand out 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeLassister Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 I don't care what system is in place as long as each game awards the same amount of points. It makes zero sense for one game to hand out 2 points to a team and another to hand out 3. I disagree. The system BCHabnut, myself and some others propose would allow 2 or 1 point. Never 3 though. They do that in soccer (3 pts for a win / 0 for a loss total of 3 and 1 each team for a tie for 2 points total) and it's all good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illWill Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 I disagree. The system BCHabnut, myself and some others propose would allow 2 or 1 point. Never 3 though. They do that in soccer (3 pts for a win / 0 for a loss total of 3 and 1 each team for a tie for 2 points total) and it's all good. My proposal is 3 wins for a win in regulation, 2 for a win in ot/shootout and 1 for ot/shootout loss. Teams go for the win in regulation and also really separates teams that hold on for the extra frame. Anyway, different opinions, all good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeLassister Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 My proposal is 3 wins for a win in regulation, 2 for a win in ot/shootout and 1 for ot/shootout loss. Teams go for the win in regulation and also really separates teams that hold on for the extra frame. Anyway, different opinions, all good. Except that your proposal keeps the Loser Point alive. It is, for some of us, the main concern. We want to get rid of it + have the teams push for a "team win" before shootout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illWill Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 Except that your proposal keeps the Loser Point alive. It is, for some of us, the main concern. We want to get rid of it + have the teams push for a "team win" before shootout. You rally your troops and I will rally mine. Eventually the scoring system will change to something and I think mostly everyone can agree the current one needs to change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.