DON Posted August 27 Share Posted August 27 20 hours ago, GHT120 said: True ... but I would be shocked if, in their pre-draft meetings, they discussed Eiserman being available at #21. I still think the move up to 21, was simply to increase odds of 'a' better player higher on their list being available and not to target just Hage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomh009 Posted August 27 Share Posted August 27 2 hours ago, DON said: I still think the move up to 21, was simply to increase odds of 'a' better player higher on their list being available and not to target just Hage. Sure, because at the time of the trade they didn’t know yet who would be available. But of the players they did expect to be available at 21, they clearly thought Hage was the best choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habs Fan in Edmonton Posted August 27 Author Share Posted August 27 On 8/26/2024 at 7:56 AM, GHT120 said: True ... but I would be shocked if, in their pre-draft meetings, they discussed Eiserman being available at #21. I tend to agree, it was surprising Eiserman dropped as far as he did but maybe it wasn't surprising to the scouts. There were obviously some red flags regarding his play. It would have interesting to see if Montreal would have taken Hage had Eiserman been available but we will likely never know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habs Fan in Edmonton Posted August 27 Author Share Posted August 27 1 hour ago, tomh009 said: Sure, because at the time of the trade they didn’t know yet who would be available. But of the players they did expect to be available at 21, they clearly thought Hage was the best choice. True, they just didn't know if Hage would be available at 21 so they surely had options, B,C,D and E on the table. The clip of their pre draft meeting provided no insight on who else they may have taken, obviously heavily edited. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted August 27 Share Posted August 27 @tomh009 @dlbalr Can we seperate out the 2025 draft posts and the 2024 draft video posts into two seperate threads please 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomh009 Posted August 27 Share Posted August 27 3 hours ago, Commandant said: @tomh009 @dlbalr Can we seperate out the 2025 draft posts and the 2024 draft video posts into two seperate threads please Finally figured how to do it ... need to do one by one. Ugh. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted August 27 Share Posted August 27 Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlbalr Posted August 27 Share Posted August 27 4 hours ago, tomh009 said: Finally figured how to do it ... need to do one by one. Ugh. There's a way to do that - I sent you a PM with the steps. Thanks for moving the posts around. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DON Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 Rehash of draft picks. Rewinding on the 2024 NHL Draft | Montréal Canadiens Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.