Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, dlbalr said:

 

The qualifying offer is valid until mid-July and is open for acceptance any time between Wednesday and then.  

 

It's safe to say he won't be offer-sheeted but the likeliest outcome is that he files for salary arbitration, the deadline for which I think is Sunday.  If that happens, the qualifying offer basically doesn't matter and if they can't agree on a contract by then, it goes to a hearing and an arbitrator picks the deal.

 

The Habs can still trade Dach but otherwise, yes, he'll be back next season.

Oh man... 

Posted
36 minutes ago, WildTurkeyXX said:

Oh man... 

 

Perhaps Dach gets traded

 

Perhaps Dach plays an entire season without major injury and shows why he was drafted third overall

 

Or…Dach gets injured again 😖

Posted
10 minutes ago, Prime Minister Koivu said:

 

Perhaps Dach gets traded

 

Perhaps Dach plays an entire season without major injury and shows why he was drafted third overall

 

Or…Dach gets injured again 😖

Haha yes, perhaps. I just really thought that chapter had closed...

Posted

As the qualifying offer is for one year and Dach will want longer, you have to believe there is a chance to get a lower and longer deal sorted. It becomes more tradeable and gives Dach a chance to play for a bigger contract going forwards. 

 

Whilst I am not sure Dach will ever be worth what we traded him for, he could be a serviceable winger who could put up at least 40 points if he played 82 games. But I am not sure that will happen in Montreal. So time to 

 

My guess will be 2 x $3 million and he gets traded to a rebuilder (Ottawa?) mid-season or ends up back on the ward. 

Posted
14 hours ago, WildTurkeyXX said:

Does this mean that we did QO Dach?

 

Yes.

 

Dach's QO is low considering if he didnt have a qualifying offer he would immediately become the number 1 UFA centre on July 1st.  (Currently Boone Jenner).

 

There are just no Cs available and his value is bigger than his QO, even if they are shopping him in trades (which is very possible).

 

Losing him for free by not qualifying him would just be bad asset management 

 

Also with the way the cap is rising 4m is not that much.  Consider Brett Kulak just signed a deal taking him to age 38 at 4.5m a season.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Commandant said:

 

Yes.

 

Dach's QO is low considering if he didnt have a qualifying offer he would immediately become the number 1 UFA centre on July 1st.  (Currently Boone Jenner).

 

There are just no Cs available and his value is bigger than his QO, even if they are shopping him in trades (which is very possible).

 

Losing him for free by not qualifying him would just be bad asset management 

 

Also with the way the cap is rising 4m is not that much.  Consider Brett Kulak just signed a deal taking him to age 38 at 4.5m a season.

Everything you've said is perfectly logical. 

Although I do question whether he would be considered more valuable than Jenner (I don't think that would be my assessment).

And I question his value, in general, considering his lack of inclusion in any trade talk rumors (that I'm aware of). 

But this could also simply be chalked up to a difference in opinion between myself and the team management. Maybe they just have never considered trading him. Maybe they just like him.

But for me, I was done with Dach at this time last year. I don't like him at Center, I don't like him at Wing. I don't like him in the top 6, I don't like him in the bottom 6. I honestly think I prefer our lineup when he's on IR. (Not saying I wish injury on the guy, just that I prefer the lineup without him in it)

That said, it's not like we need the cap space. So I guess it doesn't matter. 

Posted
20 minutes ago, WildTurkeyXX said:

Everything you've said is perfectly logical. 

Although I do question whether he would be considered more valuable than Jenner (I don't think that would be my assessment).

And I question his value, in general, considering his lack of inclusion in any trade talk rumors (that I'm aware of). 

But this could also simply be chalked up to a difference in opinion between myself and the team management. Maybe they just have never considered trading him. Maybe they just like him.

But for me, I was done with Dach at this time last year. I don't like him at Center, I don't like him at Wing. I don't like him in the top 6, I don't like him in the bottom 6. I honestly think I prefer our lineup when he's on IR. (Not saying I wish injury on the guy, just that I prefer the lineup without him in it)

That said, it's not like we need the cap space. So I guess it doesn't matter. 

 

Given that Boone Jenner is 33 years old. 

 

Has the same injury issues as Dach.... hasn't played 70 games since before Covid and that includes seasons of 26 and 41 games. 

I think Dach would get a longer term deal for more total money (but maybe less AAV) than Jenner if he was a completely Unrestricted Free Agent open to all 32 teams.


We will never know for sure though. 

  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Commandant said:

 

Given that Boone Jenner is 33 years old. 

 

Has the same injury issues as Dach.... hasn't played 70 games since before Covid and that includes seasons of 26 and 41 games. 

I think Dach would get a longer term deal for more total money (but maybe less AAV) than Jenner if he was a completely Unrestricted Free Agent open to all 32 teams.


We will never know for sure though. 

True enough, can't argue with that.

Posted
35 minutes ago, WildTurkeyXX said:

Any predictions? Big trades? Big signings?

 

I'll play ... and embarrass myself

  • Demidov extension (5yrs @ $9.3M) 
  • Marchment (4@$7.2M)


 

Posted
16 minutes ago, GHT120 said:

 

I'll play ... and embarrass myself

  • Demidov extension (5yrs @ $9.3M) 
  • Marchment (4@$7.2M)


 

I hope you’re wrong!  I want Demidov signed for 8 years!

Posted
3 minutes ago, hab29RETIRED said:

I hope you’re wrong!  I want Demidov signed for 8 years!

 

That would probably be more like at least $12M

Posted
26 minutes ago, GHT120 said:

 

That would probably be more like at least $12M

EVER so happy to be wrong

 

 

image.png

 

Posted
38 minutes ago, GHT120 said:

 

That would probably be more like at least $12M

 

Or our GM wizard got 8 years at less than you guessed for 5.

 

Kent is a wizard.

Posted
1 minute ago, Commandant said:

 

Or our GM wizard got 8 years at less than you guessed for 5.

 

Kent is a wizard.

 

Again ... EVER so happy to be wrong

Posted
34 minutes ago, GHT120 said:

 

Again ... EVER so happy to be wrong

 

I would have guessed wrong too. 

 

This wasn't a HAHA you were wrong post, this was a Kent Hughes is a ####ing wizard post. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, GHT120 said:

 

I'll play ... and embarrass myself

  • Demidov extension (5yrs @ $9.3M) 
  • Marchment (4@$7.2M)


 

Not bad man, good guess!

Posted
3 hours ago, GHT120 said:

 

That would probably be more like at least $12M

Really 😆

Posted
9 minutes ago, hab29RETIRED said:

Really 😆

As I've said three times now ... EVER so happy to be wrong

Posted
22 hours ago, GHT120 said:

As I've said three times now ... EVER so happy to be wrong

Your 9.3 for 5, would have been most people's guess. Hughes is a master at negotiations. Now he needs to use all that space saved over the last 3 years to find someone to play with Demidov.  Wing or Centre doesnt matter. The skill matters. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...