BTH Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 ottawa 3 - montreal 1 meszaros :puke: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athlétique.Canadien Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 Sucks C'mon Aebischer. BTW: Does he have a pic of a Quebec Je me Souviens licence plate on his mask saying "abby"? Anyone know Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortcat1 Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 montreal outshot ottawa 11 - 9 but montreal, as far as i understand it, out penalized ottawa too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbr93 Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 what's this crap about patrick traverse? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jordi Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 Is it time to start screaming it's over again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athlétique.Canadien Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 (edited) Souray being OK makes the Traverse move look that much more obvious as a depth move. Edited September 29, 2006 by ATHLÉTIQUE.CANADIEN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortcat1 Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 i'm listening to ckac radio and there's a discussion with the senators play-by-play announcer. he predicts that montreal won't make the playoffs because of lack of depth on the defence, the big question mark of huet combined with the disappointment of aebischer and the uncertain potential of the offence. on the other hand, he says that ottawa will do VERY well. they have good goaltending, good defensive depth & three scoring lines. i wonder if there might be a minor bias here. he also says that havlat's loss won't be an impact on the team except on paper. too many injuries and underplaying - he's a third line player. :king: :hlogo: :king: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbr93 Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 i'm listening to ckac radio and there's a discussion with the senators play-by-play announcer. he predicts that montreal won't make the playoffs because of lack of depth on the defence, the big question mark of huet combined with the disappointment of aebischer and the uncertain potential of the offence. on the other hand, he says that ottawa will do VERY well. they have good goaltending, good defensive depth & three scoring lines. i wonder if there might be a minor bias here. he also says that havlat's loss won't be an impact on the team except on paper. too many injuries and underplaying - he's a third line player. :king: :hlogo: :king: I lived in Ottawa for 14 years and heard many broadcasts by Brown and Wilson. They always bothered me, because they are extremely biased towards the Sens. They both hate the Canadiens, and are nothing more than shameless cheerleaders. Those two have to be some of the worst when it comes to "homerism". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fromage Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 Havlat a third line player??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athlétique.Canadien Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 i'm listening to ckac radio and there's a discussion with the senators play-by-play announcer. he predicts that montreal won't make the playoffs because of lack of depth on the defence, the big question mark of huet combined with the disappointment of aebischer and the uncertain potential of the offence. on the other hand, he says that ottawa will do VERY well. they have good goaltending, good defensive depth & three scoring lines. i wonder if there might be a minor bias here. he also says that havlat's loss won't be an impact on the team except on paper. too many injuries and underplaying - he's a third line player. :king: :hlogo: :king: IMO: Will Ottawa miss Havlat? Yes and no. But mostly yes! There is no way Muckler had a good day when Chicago signed him. His opinion on Montreal has merit with the weakened defence, but the outcome of the standings is way off. This must be driving the staff nuts. I personally want Kostitsyn and Latendresse in Montreal. Both of them are knocking at the door :king: :hlogo: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortcat1 Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 (edited) Havlat a third line player??? the guy said that havlat usually only played about 12 minutes a game... whatever.... :king: :hlogo: :king: Edited September 29, 2006 by shortcat1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chief_balthor Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 If anyone on here is in the Ottawa region, you can see the game on channel 22, the local Rogers station. Back to the game! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortcat1 Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 ottawa 4 - montreal 1 another power play goal by meszaros................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athlétique.Canadien Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 (edited) the guy said that havlat usually only played about 12 minutes a game... whatever.... :king: :hlogo: :king: Havlat TOI: http://www.nhl.com/players/gbg/20052006/8467899.html Edited September 29, 2006 by ATHLÉTIQUE.CANADIEN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortcat1 Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 (edited) announcers are saying that aebischer is the second coming of santa claus.... Edited September 29, 2006 by shortcat1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbr93 Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 Havlat a third line player??? Funny, they never thought he was a third line player before he got traded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortcat1 Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 ottawa 4 - montreal 2 plekanec from latendresse and ottawa penalty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athlétique.Canadien Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 (edited) Average 18 to 20 mins for Havlat. Check it out: http://www.nhl.com/players/gbg/20052006/8467899.html Edited September 29, 2006 by ATHLÉTIQUE.CANADIEN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortcat1 Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 another montreal penalty... sheeeeshhhhhhhhhhh too many men on the ice.................... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athlétique.Canadien Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 (edited) Did you just hear it CJAD listeners? Come back now. SOURAY is OK :hlogo: Howie Morenz avec Jacques Plante la main inaperçue. Les Glorieux Edited September 29, 2006 by ATHLÉTIQUE.CANADIEN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortcat1 Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 ottawa 5 - montreal 2 neal... neil.... kneel... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
habs_in_the_blood Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 well this is great ...5-2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athlétique.Canadien Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 (edited) well this is great ...5-2 At least we got good news about #44. But as for the game... Edited September 29, 2006 by ATHLÉTIQUE.CANADIEN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
habs_in_the_blood Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 At least we got good news about #44. But as for the game... yeah i heard it on the radio in my car waiting at the clinic...i just got home now dammit!! got there at 4 !!! n e ways heres to the habs steping it up a notch! are they beeing totally dominated? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonus Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 latendresse has the least amount of ice time for habs according to NHL.com... what the hell? 5:39?!? can anybody else listening to CJAD believe that Michael Farber doesnt usually do radio color? He is a total natural Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.