GoHabs2002 Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 So he talked about the Leafs in his segment on the TSN preview show, but check out Damian Cox's comments on about the Canadiens, from his article about all 6 Canadian teams: MONTREAL LAST YEAR: 93 points, 7th in East, lost in 1st round. OFF THE ICE: Bob Gainey hands over the coaching reins to Guy Carbonneau, with Kirk Muller as an assistant. They will almost certainly produce an excellent defensive team. ON THE ICE: No. 1 goalie Cristobal Huet took the league by storm, but he played only 36 regular season games. With a big new contract, he'd better be the real deal. ... The same defence corps returns: Andrei Markov, Craig Rivet, Mathieu Dandenault and Sheldon Souray. Francis Bouillon, who won't be back from knee surgery until November, is underrated. ... Sergei Samsonov is a small speedster joining a team full of 'em. Still, 18 teams scored more goals. PIVOTAL PLAYER: C Saku Koivu. INTANGIBLES: Goaltending is solid, defence is mobile and reliable. Close to being a team that could really make a move. THE SEASON AHEAD: Could push for division crown. source: Toronto Star Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athlétique.Canadien Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Thank you D.C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pierre the Great Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 lol of course he couldn't say what he felt on the air or he'd have been in breach of contract I bet. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KoZed Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 All those predictions means so little. Our division is wide open because none of the 5 teams have a proven, reliable starter in nets, except maybe Buffalo with Biron. Boston: Toivonen - Thomas Buffalo: Miller - Biron Montreal: Huet - Aebischer Ottawa: Gerber - Emery Toronto: Raycroft - Aubin/Tellqvist. Are the days of the realiable #1 guy over? Seems its all a matter of tandems now, and Montreal perhaps has the 2nd best after Buffalo. Then you go with D: Boston: Chara, Stuart, Mara, Jurcina, Stuart, Alberts, Dempsey, York Buffalo: Lydman, Numminen, Campbell, Tallinder, Spacek, Kalinin, Paetsch Montreal: Markov, Rivet, Souray, Bouillon, Dandenault, Komisarek, Niinimaa, Streit Ottawa: Redden, Phillips, Meszaros, Preissing, Volchenkov, Corvo, Schubert Toronto: McCabe, Kaberle, Kubina, Gill, White, Kronwall, Colaiacovo, Belak Buffalo maybe has the best overall group, closely followed by Ottawa and Montreal, while Toronto and Boston maybe have the best top 3. Montreal has one edge over all other team and its experience. Only Komisarek is a little green. Then top 12 forwards on each teams: Boston: Bergeron, Murray, Savard, Sturm, Kessels, Boyes, Axelsson, Primeau, Donovan, Buffalo: Briere, Drury, Afinogenov, Vanek, Hecht, Kotalik, Roy, Connolly, Pominville Montreal: Kovalev, Samsonov, Koivu, Higgins, Plekanec, Ryder, Bonk, Johnson, Begin Ottawa: Alfredsson, Heatley, Spezza, Schaefer, Vermette, Fisher, Eaves, McAmmond, Neil. Toronto: Sundin, Tucker, Wellwood, Steen, Peca, Ponikarovsky, Kilger, Stajan, O'Neill Best group of forwards is almost a wash between Buffalo, Montreal and Ottawa. Ottawa has the best top 3 and Buffalo the most offense upside in its top 12, but Montreal has perhaps the best balance between offense/defense and size/speed. Consider this: Begin has almost as good stats as Peca last year, so you know Leafs are shitty. And if you want to go deeper past 12th forwards, no team can match Montreal who has prospects like Perezhogin, Latendresse, Kostitsyn, Grabovsky and etc. waiting to burst out. So overall, I'd say it'll be a 3-way fight between Montreal, Buffalo and Ottawa for the division title, with Boston and Toronto trailing behind. But there's still so little edge on either team that not much could make it all change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAK Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 I'm scared of that toivonen. he could be this yers's cam ward or jose theodre( the good one) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMMR Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Interesting! great post KoZeD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brobin Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Well, when he wrote that, we still had Ribs. On the preview show, he took into account the trade. :LOL Just kidding... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zowpeb Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 (edited) Ottawa - Ottawa has the best top tier forwards in the division but lacks depth on the 4th line IMHO. Their D has a good combination of depth and top level guys. Gerber is probably the best goalie in the division if he plays like last year. If Gerber performs well they have enough depth at D and a strong enough top 2 lines and PP to make a run for the division against Buffalo. Buffalo - Buffalo has great balance, speed, depth at every position, including goalie. They strike me as a team that will be tough all year, have limited injuries but probably struggle come playoffs. Their goaltending tandem is probably the best in the division but Miller may steal the show this year. I don't see many weaknesses in this line-up. They should battle for the division, possibly the conference. I don't know if they have enough top tier talent to really make a charge in the playoffs though... Montreal - Montreal also has very good balance of speed and depth all through...a little lacking at C. Lots of youth that could grab a spotlight, good vets throughout. Montreal COULD challenge Buffalo's tandem if Huet is the real deal. A reliable but unspectacular D...only Markov is a standout. Montreal has the ability to do what Buffalo did last year but need Huet to continue to perform and need 1-2 of Higgins, Plekanec, Latendresse and Perezhogin to have good years(by that I mean 20+ goals, 45+ points). I think the Habs are a lock for the playoffs, may be able to finish ahead of Ottawa if they have injury issues or Gerber stumbles. Best case would be 2nd in the division, worst case 3rd...between 4th and 7th in the conference. Boston - Some good talent up front but a little thin past the 2nd line. Great trio of D-men lead an otherwise thin group here. Another solid tandem...Toivonen also has the talent to be the top G in the division. They only differ from Toronto in having better goalies and a couple more scorers. They'll compete night in, night out but ultimately will struggle to make the playoffs. Toronto - No depth up front, limited scoring. A trio of great defenders lead a pretty thin group, not quite as thin as Boston. Their goaltending is a huge risk and question mark...Raycroft could rebound and make them solid here. I can honestly see Toronto being among the worst 3-4 teams in the league...all bias aside. They have Sundin, Tucker, Peca and possibly Steen. Then they have McCabe, Kubina and Kaberle. Then they have a bunch of mediocrity through out the rest of the team. Absolutely not enough talent to score goals up front... JMHO. Edited October 5, 2006 by Zowpeb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shu Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 I think we can win division Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Habby2919 Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Itll be a scrap between us and Buffalo and Ottawa but without too many injuries we should be ok. :hlogo: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huzer Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 I think we can win division As much as I love my Habs, I don't think there's a chance the Habs take the Northeast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaos Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 All those predictions means so little. Our division is wide open because none of the 5 teams have a proven, reliable starter in nets, except maybe Buffalo with Biron. Actually Miller is Buffalo's number 1 goalie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KoZed Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 Actually Miller is Buffalo's number 1 goalie Let me rephrase so you understand: of all the goalies in our division, only Biron is or has been a #1 for some years. Miller, like Huet, is #1 because he was hot last season. That doesn't make either Miller or Huet "proven, reliable starters". Same for everyone in the division, except Biron. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTH Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 Let me rephrase so you understand: of all the goalies in our division, only Biron is or has been a #1 for some years. Miller, like Huet, is #1 because he was hot last season. That doesn't make either Miller or Huet "proven, reliable starters". Same for everyone in the division, except Biron. Aebischer's proven but not necessarily reliable (he had a slump last season and nearly lost his job). Made a bet with my Bruins-fan friend today. Bet him 5$ that the Habs would make the playoffs. Easy money. :hlogo: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobRock Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 I think the Sabres are going to miss Jay McKee and J.P. Dumont more than they think. McKee made almost as many saves as Biron and Miller made on some nights, and Dumont was a pretty consistent player for them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.