Jump to content

Habsfan89

Member
  • Posts

    1645
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

Posts posted by Habsfan89

  1. Just now, IN THE HEARTS OF MEN said:

    I would argue Dumba

    is inferior to Petry regardless of age...

     

    And the assets recieved for RD Petry flipped for RD Dumba just doesn't make sense.

     

    We need a #1LD as we have a #2 and a number #3 LD.

    I got Goodrow in my fantasy lineup!!

    Haha

    Romanov will be the LD Bergevin gets this off season.

    Chiarot 

    Romanov 

    Mete

    Will be our LD going into next season  

  2. 2 minutes ago, Chris said:

    If they are turning over the team to be younger and more talented, why are they resigning Petry, makes no sense. 

     

    Totally agree that tatar and petry will be moved at the draft or deadline next year, i would have done it today with the insane prices going on. 

     

    They need skill, size and speed on this team desperately, 

     

    I can hear it now, trades are hard, i think we can contend next year with this group, injuries were a major factor, rinse / repeat 

    I agree gm's giving up a lot and if we're going to trade them at next year's deadline we won't get as much as we would of this year.

    It would of gave us more draft picks and more cap space, in which we could of traded for a star player or sign free agent's in July to replace them.

  3. 1 minute ago, IN THE HEARTS OF MEN said:

    Not sure Dumba is the answer we are looking for as our #1LD. Hes a 2nd pair guy in my books and Chairot is doing fine in that role once he trickles down... and do we need Dumba with Romanov joining the team? We need a #1 LD...

     

    Also, expect a Pacioretty like deal for Petry if he isnt extended for another 3/4 years...

    Dumba is a RD and younger, and  under contract for an extra 2 more years than Petry .

     

     

     

     

  4. 15 minutes ago, tomh009 said:

     

    Some of them could be fabulous (think Gallagher) -- but the probability is low, so it's good to have lots of picks in the late rounds.

    Yeah but that's not the point I am making, some people don't like what Ottawa is doing but Montreal is doing the something. Yet people give the 👍 to Bergevin, doesn't make sense to me. 

     

    I like what they're both doing but think Bergevin should of traded Tatar and Petry today. Here's my thinking..

     

    Look at what Ottawa got for pageau, I think Montreal could of gotten the same if not an extra 2nd for petry.

    So lets say we got a 1st and two 2nd round picks for Petry from a team.  Then At the draft we could then flip that 1st and a 2nd to Minnesota for Dumba .  

  5. 4 minutes ago, alfredoh2009 said:

    It has been debated at length how picks outside the top 10 are like forest gump’s box of chocolates 

     

    The Sens stock piling of picks doesn’t guarantee their rebuild anymore than the CH’s

     

    I like the Habs plan so far despite wanting Petry traded now that his value is the highest 

    So then whys even happy with Bergevin getting draft picks in later rounds.  If picks outside top ten are like quote " forest gumps box of chocolates " could imagine what 2,4and 5 round picks are going to turn out.

     

     

  6. 7 minutes ago, DON said:

    WHAAAAAAAAAAAA?:wacko:

    They could end up with 3 lottery picks plus 4 2nd round picks. How do you not like the way they're rebuilding.

     

    If you're not going to rebuild through Free agency, and your going to rebuild through the draft, this is the way you do it.

  7. 2 minutes ago, dlbalr said:

    Pageau gets a six-year extension with the Islanders.  That could make the deal better for them...or even worse depending on how much they paid him.

    Would of loved to see him play for the habs.  But for Ottawa to walk away from him and trade him, i am assuming the term will be high.

  8. 29 minutes ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said:

     

    Moving Tatar is hardly "blowing up the core." He's the guy I'd be shipping out (assuming a competitive return).

     

    Petry is a bigger issue because his departure would turn a mediocre blueline into a catastrophic one.

     

    As for those persistent Price rumours, now THAT is the unicorn. A trade which - if we get back the kind of return you expect for Price - could really change the parameters of the Habs' future. I am pessimistic that it will happen, but hope it does.

    When I say core I just don’t mean Tatar. But I look at him as part of this core group.

     

    Our core group we should be looking at trading are Tatar, Petry, Price, Weber.

     

    You can ask for a young NHL ready D prospect in exchange for Petry .
     

    I really like the path Ottawa took to rebuild their team and think that's the path we should of took.
     

  9. 5 minutes ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said:

     

    Seems logical. I hope we move at least one of them. But we probably won't, and already quite a few posters here and media commentators are stroking their beards and sagely nodding as if standing pat is a wise move by Bergevin 🙄

    The problem is Bergevin thinks this core is good to win and won't blow it up 

  10. 3 minutes ago, hab29RETIRED said:

    Given the return for Pageau, we should be moving Petry and Tatar. It looks like GM’s have gone back to the old deadline/free agency days stupidity mode.

    I know that's what I was thinking, we could even get more because they got the extra year on their contracts.

  11. 46 minutes ago, tomh009 said:

    We paid nothing to get him, he helped the team and scored a bunch, and we end up with a 3rd. It’s clear win, albeit a small one.

    Oh I know I agree it's a win, but you can still discuss the would've ,could've , should've.  Like I said water cooler talk.

×
×
  • Create New...