Jump to content

IN THE HEARTS OF MEN

Member
  • Posts

    2408
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30

Posts posted by IN THE HEARTS OF MEN

  1. 1 hour ago, DON said:

    William Nylander.

    he would likely be the only winger I think we could target that would make us significantly better. Im not so sure I would want to throw 10+ million at him though. I think trading one of our budding Dman, a mid tier forward prospect and picks for a younger not so highly paid stud winger would be more up my alley

  2. 8 hours ago, BCHabnut said:

    It’s so visible. he looks good. My co worker saying he had a bad game. I didn’t see that at all. He is getting way more touches, and making way better choices with those touches.

    I thought he coasted a little too much in this game... hes a big boy and can skate, so I'd like to see him press a bit more and keep those feet moving and two hands on his stick more often away from the puck. But LY to TY is already night and day after just 5 games.

  3. 2 minutes ago, GHT120 said:

    His "issue" is that he continues to play when "injured" ... the distinction I draw is that, with proper treatment and rehabilitation, players can recover from being hurt even while they continue to play ... while injuries require time off to heal ... it is a distinction that not enough players draw.

    What character he brings to the skills he possess is what I say to that... a warrior

  4. End of the day, he's worth way more than just a late 1st rd pick, particularly for this young team. On top of that, we already secured a 1st rd asset when we acquired him and he'll be valuable at the end of a 3/4 year deal. I really think Hughes is going to re-sign him again. Why would we want to trade him... hes freakin a really good player. Even those 25 games last year... he was great. 

     

    Its Dvorak who gets shipped out

     

  5. 1 hour ago, Commandant said:

     

     

     

    2020 ended early with most teams at approx 72 games played but not exactly due to the nature of the COVID stoppage.

    So That 70 game 2019-20, that was basically the full season.

     

    Remember as well that 50 game 2020-21, that was on a 56 game season, as we only started in January and only played the Canadian division.

     

    So that makes his injury issues even less. 

    Yes 2019/20Calgary played only 70 games.... he actually played the whole season

    Teams played between 68-71 depending when the season was called for them.

     

    2021 he played 50 of 56

     

    In total he missed 23 games in 8 seasons before missing 74 games in his last 2 seasons 54 of which was with Habs.

     

     

  6. 4 hours ago, Prime Minister Koivu said:

    I frankly think the umbrella style doesn’t work for this team, even though it’s the popular thing right now. 
     

    My evidence is that our PP stinks and has for YEARS

    I think its about who's QB'ing and from where on the ice.

    That's why I would want to switch Suzuki for Slav and his right side one timer (first team PP will help his progression and confidence),as well as give Matheson two one timer options from both sides of the ice. Suzuki and Caufield left side one timer and bumper. Monahan circulating out of both  corners.

     

    It also gives us the option of walking off the Wall into the slot both sides of the ice now and doesn't really change passing lanes but in fact opens more lanes up. With Suzuki on the right, he usually  walks down the wall to shoot a wrister (which is less effective) or find a passing lane.  Options are endless this way...

     

    Again, see TB as the poster team for this... and I think we have these tools.

    Copy and paste their players

     

  7. 1 hour ago, Commandant said:

     

    I still think the biggest issue is the slingshot zone entry.  On their worst pps, they don't even get setup most of the time. 

     

    I also think that an umbrella can work if they establish more than one way to score goals.

    Slingshot is a huge issue... it was slightly more effective vs Wash but is still a mess. Once they do gain the zone, they have improved with puck and palyer movement. Faceoff win% has been strong so far overall which goes a long way. I still think the next decision ro be made is removing Anderson for Slav on first unit and to play on the right boards for Suzuki and move Suzuki to bumper role ala Point or even Caufield there and let Suzuki play the left side one timer. We need a one timer option on both sides personally. Matheson up top and Monahan low.

     

     

  8. 14 minutes ago, hab29RETIRED said:

    Monohan has been injured consistently since 2017, and has been missing more time each year. At 29, recovery is gong to get worse as he continues to age, compared to Dach who is still only 22. Having said that - I am worried about Dach, but am more willing to gamble on him given his age.

    This is not true... 

     

    Monahan

     

    2013 79 games

    2014 81 games

    2015 81 games

    2016 82 games 

    2017  74 games

    2018 78 games

    2019 70 games

    2020 50 games (hip injury)

    2021 65 games other hip

    2022 25 games (broken foot)

    Currently 4 games played

     

     

    • Upvote 1
  9. 23 minutes ago, TurdBurglar said:

     

    Picks don’t use contract slots and have value, especially 1st round picks.  Not all picks have to be used to pick players.  Typically picks have a fixed value, where players value fluctuates constantly.  So having more picks is the safest for value rather than more players.  While picks do have some degree of fluctuation, it has more predictability than players.

     

    For the reason above, I would much rather have a picks over resigning Monahan.  There are reasons to resign Monahan, but an insurance for a Dach-like situation isn’t one of them.  You can’t use a player that is injury prone as a backup plan for players that don’t get injured as often.  I see the reasoning behind it skill-wise, but realistically Monahan has a higher chance to be injured than someone like Dach.

    Does he though?  Dach is shelved again for the season and for basically the 3rd season in a row now... nobody said this of Monahan until he had his hips worked on and broke a foot LY.

     

    Monahan is like playing with house money, and I'm for holding onto the money for at least 1 more season after this.

    Of course if a "Knock your socks off" offer was on the table... that is a different story.  But getting a 24-32th pick only? Personally I think Monahan at 29YRS old is worth more signed and supporting the kids then the 1st rounder we would exchange him for.

     

  10. 9 minutes ago, Habs Fan in Edmonton said:

     

    I agree, if we can get a 1st plus for Monahan then you grab it. I really like Monahan, he brings a lot to the team which is why you would probably get a lot for him. A little too early for anything to happen on that front but I am confident Hughes will do the right thing. 

    With Dach out for the season... if he stays healthy, im of the opinion there is almost zero chance he gets moved unless of course we are bottom feeders by  January.

  11. 16 minutes ago, Commandant said:

     

    No one is saying he should get an extension today. 

     

    They are saying if he has a good season and stays healthy, would you re-sign him. 

     

    We talk lots of hypotheticals on this board, I dont see what is different about this one. 

     

    Also for everyone, re-sign and resign are two different words with almost opposite meanings. 

     

    Resign is to quit a job

    Re-sign is to extend a contract. 

     

     

    LoL... let's go with re-upped then ...

  12. 1 hour ago, hab29RETIRED said:

    Which is why if someone is willing to give up a first+ in advance of the deadline, wouldn’t hesitate to wait to see if we can sign him.

    How many picks do we need though really? With another 22 on the way in the next 2 off-seasons and a 50 contract threshold? We are quickly coming up to the borderline of having to start leveraging some of these assets before losing them...

  13. 54 minutes ago, Commandant said:

     

    He can want what he wants, but I don't see any team in the NHL giving him 7 years.  I really don't. 

    I think 4 years is a bit of a stretch as well.  

    I'd give him two and that would be about it, maybe three if he's really having a great year, but given his history, I don't see any way he gets 7, even on the open market.

    I think your close to bang on here. I do believe though if he can play over 70 games this year we have him at a steal rate and a 3 year deal is very, very likely wherever he does land.

×
×
  • Create New...