Jump to content

sim.on

Member
  • Posts

    715
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by sim.on

  1. One thing I have to say is that I really like how simple and easy to use the site is. For the most part I think that maybe the aesthetics could do with a little update and modernization.

    Just as an example, I'm not a fan of the new TSN website. New one feels messy and trickier to navigate, also, the added complexity has seemed to make the site a little slower and less reliable.

    I think it would be cool to have some sort of fantasy game on the site. A format that would allow for an unlimited amount of participants. Nothing is popping to mind at the moment but if we could somehow include a Habs related twist into the fantasy league I think that would be cool.

  2. Seems like MB is in a "win now" frame of mind. I wouldn't be surprised to see Beaulieu get traded.

    I would be vey surprised to see either of Beaulieu or Tinordi moved. IMHO Habsfan hit the nail on the head.

    great trade by Bergevin. We didn't lose anything and we picked up a BIG d-man!! I don't see why this would mean that either Tinordi or Beaulieu will be traded? Allen is a UFA at the end of the season.

    We all know it takes longer for d-man to be NHL ready. Another season in the AHL for Beaulieu and Tinordi is not a bad thing. They'll get big minutes down there and we'll see if they're ready next year!

    Allen and Weaver might not be back next year, which will clear room for the kids on the D.

  3. The Bulldogs (6-7-2-0) will be in tough tonight as they travel to Utica to take on the league-leading Comets (11-2-2-0), affiliate of Vancouver.

    14ham_500.gif

    Bourque - Hensick - Hudon

    Tangradi - Andrighetto - Dumont

    Carr - de la Rose - Dowell

    Crisp - Macenauer

    Tinordi - Pateryn

    Drewiske - Nygren

    Finley - Dietz

    Bennett

    MacDonald

    Lol I thought the 11 forwards 7 d-men was a MT thing more than an organizational philosophy.

  4. Does the bad contract have one less year than Bourque (expires this summer)? Does it carry a cheaper cap hit? If the answer to either of those is yes and assuming the Habs consider Bourque as deadweight, there's a reason to take one bad deal for another.

    Trading Bourque for a pick is out of the question without retaining salary. A few games in Hamilton isn't enough to sway a teams' opinion on him.

    Good point. After all the NHL is a business and saving money is directly related to making money, even if the potential deal has little to no impact on the roster or the on ice performance of the team.

  5. <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    There are 2-3 teams who have poked around on Bourque but Montreal will likely have to take back a contract they don't want #Habs

    — Andy Strickland (@andystrickland) November 20, 2014

    Why trade one bad contract for another? I assume the potential acquired player will not likely have a spot on the Mtl roster if the team shipping them out wants to play Bourque. Ideally, he could be dumped for a pick but I guess that is not likely since he went unclaimed on waivers.

  6. I think right now Therrien wishes that Weaver was available as I'm not sure he wants to play Beaulieu much the rest of the night. After being on for both goals (and directly causing the first one), he played just 45 seconds in the final 10:17 of the period. Suffice it to say, Beaulieu is having himself a really tough game so far.

    If MT decides the game is out of reach it could be a good opportunity to give Beaulieu LOTS of TOI

×
×
  • Create New...