Jump to content

Meller93

Member
  • Posts

    2253
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37

Posts posted by Meller93

  1. 45 minutes ago, Plutarch said:

    I was doing a dive into Christan Dvorak and I'm curious if I should be concerned. Looking at Corey Sznajder's 5 on 5 offense advance stats... Dvorak was the worst forward on Arizona in terms of creating shots on the forecheck or on the rush. He was also the worst on the team in terms of shots per and primary assist pass per 60.

     

    In terms of league wide his numbers in these areas are awful but a lot of that is due to Arizona being terrible... however being worst on his team doesn't look good. Are there explanations for these stats?

    For one he was burdened with taking the majority of defense zone starts, and well as facing the toughest competition. So while he played a lot of minutes, many of them were spent defending due to his role. 
     

    were he placed in an offensive role, you’d certainly see an improvement on those numbers. I’m sure quality of wingers also goes a long way as you mentioned, and Dvorak will have a bevy of strong wingers to play with this year.

    04401841-7A5A-4CC2-80BB-C3E2158F6328.jpeg

  2. 16 minutes ago, DON said:

    I was gonna disagree, revisited the 2018 draft thread and the 'many' you refer to, must be elsewhere, is that what you meant? 

    Habs "needed" a centre and resident prospect guy Commandant, said after Svchinikov at 2, was a toss up for next several picks, seems many liked Zadina and didnt see anyone clamoring for Hughes (other than Commandant said would of been his choice i think?) and some were very very happy Tkachuk wasnt chosen.

    I was one of the people happy Tkachuk wasn’t chosen - yikes in retrospect. His college numbers didn’t scream offensive potential considering he was an older player in his draft.

     

    I was definitely pulling for Zadina, but KK was alright with me. I remember the general hockey community calling it a reach, but also that KK would have been the first C off the board. AZ taking Hayton shortly after shows the premium on C in the draft.

  3. Dvorak isn’t a Danault-lite either, sure he’s two-way but they have different assets. Danault is probably better defensively but I think Dvorak probably has more offensive upside. His hands are better for sure. I think he’ll probably surprise people with a bit of flash

    • Upvote 1
  4. Seems the general consensus is a sort of golf clap for MB. The Canes put him in a tough situation, but in the end we head into next year likely a little stronger.

     

    If KK reaches his potential, it’s a loss I. The end, if he underperforms, this is actually a win.

     

    Mark me as content for now, and honestly, I’m really excited to see Dvorak as a Hab. Something tells me he’s going to be well-liked by fans and the team alike.

  5. 11 minutes ago, TheDriveFor25 said:

    The Perrault signing makes sense.

    True, the Perrault signing fills this hole pretty well. Maybe this won’t lead to any direct move.

     

    still, doesn’t it end up saving us on cap throughout the season? If we perform it could mean a trade deadline acquisition 

  6. 4 minutes ago, johnnyhasbeen said:

    Let's all agree to pick up this discussion in 5 years when the KID has had a chance to prove himself on and off the ice. How about that? 

    Yes, let’s.

     

    let’s also not entirely downplay his mistake. We can simultaneously acknowledge that he messed up, while helping the young man become a better person. It’s important not to completely forget it, or no lesson is learned.

     

    I’m not one for cancel culture either, just accountability.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
  7. I find it interesting that Bergevin was actually the guy announcing the name. I don’t remember the last time we saw him do that. It’s been Weber, Timmins, or someone else.

     

    this tells me that very likely, Timmins/Melanby either didn’t feel comfortable making the pick, or it was MBs choice alone so he decided to be the face of the backlash.

     

    Personally, I think MB doesn’t plan of re-signing with the habs when the year is done. Lately he has a give no cares attitude. Expose Price, draft Mailloux are two big gambles. I think we see more high risk moves from MB this year, before he ultimately finishes at years end.

  8. I just wish they took Raty or something. Yikes.
     

    Best we can hope for is the dust settles and this isn’t focused on for too long. He’s a young man who made a big mistake, and you have to hope he comes out on the other side more humble, and most of all with actual respect for women.

     

    I don’t like it, but it’s done. Now we just have to hope for the best. 

    • Like 1
  9. Part of me thinks Seattle is just trying to drum up anxiety in Bergevin so he’ll give them a pick not to take Price. 

    if they sign Drieger, I’d be very surprised if they have any intention of taking Price, unless they plan on flipping him to a different team at reduced salary. 
     

    Say, Price to the Avs for a first and a couple prospects. This gives the Avs that star netminder in their current cup contender window.

     

    Then they let Grub walk and sign a cheaper backup like Broissoit

     

  10. On 1/4/2021 at 4:50 PM, Prime Minister Koivu said:

    Yeah he is heading in the right direction and he will get there. I’m expecting huge stuff from him this year and if he is paired with Armia and Toffoli I think they can cause havoc   All players have size and skill - good time for Armia to show us more

    Toffoli - KK - Armia is an incredible 3rd line

  11. Elias Petterson lit the league up as a 20 year old 6’0 160 pound kid. It’s not unprecedented. Gretzky would find his way into a top 6 and first wave powerplay within no timeouts think, 

     

    To chime in on the Caufield talk, I have to say my expectations have been tempered. That said, I agree with him seeming to be snake bitten during the tourney, and I did like the flashes I saw. Still holding hope for him to become a 30+ scorer 

×
×
  • Create New...