Jump to content

tomh009

Moderators
  • Posts

    7728
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    92

Posts posted by tomh009

  1. Both Dvorak and Anderson are TBD at the moment, and the Habs' roster had only 12 forwards to start with. I think Newhook and RHP are still a month-plus away from coming back, so they'll need some reinforcements called up, and forget about sending Armia down for the moment. Heineman would be one, but who else?

  2. I think that more than anything else, the SHG rule will encourage aggressive penalty-killing, as that SHG goal becomes even more valuable. It will be interesting to see how it works in practice.

     

    The OT/SO/loser point system has also made a mockery of all the past win streak and season win records. It really doesn't matter, they could just go NASCAR style and give 300 points for regulation win, 200 for OT/SO win and 100 for an OT/SO loss. Then no one will be confused about accidentally comparing point totals!

  3. 41 minutes ago, alfredoh2009 said:

    The replays on RDS were not great and the camera angles following the play were wider (farther away) making it difficult for me to follow the puck as well as usual.

    I expect that the camera locations are those that are set up for the 67s, so it'll be OHL-level camera work for the time being, at least for the Ottawa home games.

  4. U18 and U20 tournaments are generally much more unpredictable because it's only a narrow window for players, you lose some to injury or pro leagues, there is often little depth available to replace them. As you said, the sky has not fallen!

  5. I get that, but in no sport is the better quality player (or better set of players) guaranteed to win. You need to score more to win, and if you can't do that, you're out. And that's what happened. (And even happens in the NHL playoffs from time to time.)

     

    Kudos to the Czechs for playing as a team well enough to pull out a victory. Can they repeat the performance against Sweden?

  6. 16 minutes ago, alfredoh2009 said:

    Also, I doubt the Habs other LDs can produce as many points as Matheson produces. They are not at that level yet.

    They'll produce more if they start getting some PP time.

    • Matheson: 4g+11a in 143:43 of PP
    • Barron: 1g+0a in 50:34 of PP
    • Xhekaj: 0g+0a in 17:43 of PP

    All other defenders are seven minutes or less.

     

    On the other hand, five on five:

    • Savard: 0.51g+1.01a/60
    • Barron: 0.45g+0.56a/60
    • Guhle: 0.11g+0.75a/60
    • Xhekaj: 0.27g+0.54a/60
    • Matheson: 0.20g+0.59a/60
    • Struble: 0.25g+0.5a/60
    • Kovacevic: 0.61g+0a/60
    • Harris: 0g+0.40a/60

    Matheson's scoring is mostly on the power play.

     

     

  7. 1 hour ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said:

    It’s possible that the cause is that he is focusing more on his 200-foot game. He wouldn’t be the first offensively gifted player to see his production drop as coaches lean on him to become a more rounded player. That troubles me, though, because it suggests that his ceiling may be lower than I thought; i.e., instead of becoming a reliable 40-goal man, he settles in as a 25-30 goal guy who is reliable in all zones. Which is nice and all, but not the Cole Caufield I was hoping for.

    I believe he's learning the 200-foot game, and that means his focus is likely on improving that--and St-Louis should be an excellent mentor for that, having learned much of defensive play without losing his scoring skills (and he was also an undersized player, making the lessons even more applicable). Once Caufield has internalized the defensive aspects, he should be able to put more focus on scoring again.

  8. In the post-game interview Kovacevic said that Anderson was already in the neutral zone (so presumably he was aware of what was going on) but when he saw that the Tampa net was completely empty he decided to shoot instead of passing.

     

    So, I expect Kovacevic was pretty confident he could hit the net. 🙂

  9. 26 minutes ago, hab29RETIRED said:

    I’m happy with his improvement in the D zone, but we aren’t paying him to be Bob Gainey.

    Not Gainey, but it would not be a bad thing to see some hints of MacKinnon or Bergeron in him. He's a sniper, no doubt, but if he can also help prevent the other team from scoring as much while  he's on the ice, it will make him that much more valuable to the Habs.

    • Like 1
  10. The Habs have lost three straight on this road trip now, after taking five of six points in the first three games. Tomorrow's game in Dallas is the last chance to come out of this tour with seven of fourteen possible points.

     

    And yet, I'm not entirely unhappy. The team has not been blown out, they have been in all three games with a chance to win. Some different puck luck, some different refereeing decisions or some more care avoiding penalties (too many men, pulling a helmet off etc) and they could have won a game or two.

     

    Some individual players have made mistakes, but the young ones are still learning, and the veterans won't be with us much longer, so those mistakes are not a concern for me in the long term. On the other hand, Slafkovsky's improved play is a hugely encouraging indicator, and Caufield's efforts in the D-zone make me super happy.

     

    We lost Dach for essentially the entire season, and Newhook for half of it. If we get one more decent first-round pick out of this season, and then start a serious drive for a playoff spot next year, I'm OK with that.

    • Like 1
  11. 1 hour ago, DON said:

    Suzuki, Slafkovski, Reinbacher & Caufield likely seen as 'the' core guys. The rest could be swapped for young NHLer/prospects/picks.

    So, suppose you swap Guhle for an early first-rounder-plus. Assuming that you hit on your draft pick, you now have a hot prospect--who is 18 years old next June (assuming you got a 2024 pick and not a 2025 one), rather than 21 as Guhle will be. And that prospect will then need three years of development to mature to the Guhle level. Same for trading Dach or Newhook.

     

    What you have just done is delay the Habs' contention window. This is the total opposite of what Hughes and Gorton did with the trades for Dach and Newhook, acquiring promising young players in exchange for picks.

     

    While Hughes may be swayed by a massive overpay, I don't think he'll be much interested in trading young players (who have proven that they belong in the NHL) for picks, unless it's players that cannot crack the Habs' starting lineup.

  12. Just now, dlbalr said:

    Of your core 6, I noticed you don't have Reinbacher in there.  I suspect they have him in the long-term plans.  Interesting that you have Matheson there, it might not hurt to have one true veteran in the mix.

    Matheson is 29, so he could be a fit for the Habs' contention window, should they decide that he is one that they want to keep. And Kovacevic is 26, still young for a D-man. Reinbacher, Mailloux and Kovacevic (or Barron) would be only three RD. On the left, though, johnnyhasbeen has five players (Struble, Hutson, Guhle, Xhekaj and Matheson) which is probably at least one too many.

  13. 9 hours ago, Habs Fan in Edmonton said:

    I don't disagree, it will be interesting to see how things shake out on defense as they can't keep everybody. The emergence of Struble has made things interesting on the left side.  I really like Jordan Harris but I think he may end up being the odd man out on the left side. 

    Left side has Guhle, Harris (who could also play RD), Xhekaj, Struble--and Hutson. Also Engstrom and Norlinder, who are less certain to make the NHL.

    Right side has Reinbacher, Mailloux, Kovacevic and Barron, not quite as crowded.

     

    One advantage Harris has is his ability to switch between LD and RD, which can be helpful in case of injuries. But, for sure, there are more players than there are seats. A good problem to have!

  14. On Lane Hutson…

    https://www.lapresse.ca/sports/hockey/2023-12-27/championnat-mondial-junior/pendant-ce-temps-lane-hutson.php

     

    Quote

    The head coach of the American team, David Carle, does not seem worried about Hutson's ability to defend. He even uses it when outnumbered.

    “I had been told about his offensive potential,” he told reporters the day after the match against Norway on Wednesday, “but I was surprised by his desire to limit the opponent's time and space. in defensive territory. The more I work with him on a daily basis, the more I appreciate his defensive game. We should talk more about this aspect of his game, but I understand that his offensive exploits attract more attention. »

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...