Jump to content

revin5

Member
  • Posts

    114
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by revin5

  1. If Grabovski can show he can play on either the second or third line then he will probably stick with us for the season with Murray as the odd-man out. Lapierre, even playing badly, can do anything Murray can and more (except lose fights) so he's pretty much guaranteed a spot. chipchura has also shown that he cna play on the fourth and I'm thinking that using him on the first here is more about seeing the other centers in their appropriate positions than him earning a spot.

  2. Part 1 - Michael Ryder's significance to the team

    In his 3 seasons here, he has never given us any reason to think that he has not already peaked and that he will be a one-dimensional thirty goal-scorer for the rest of his career.

    His first season all he did was hustle (and score goals), his second season he started hitting (and scored goals), in this last season he could skate (and score goals). Also during last season he started actually skating with the puck, something he wasn't able to do in his first two season (not without being rubbed out along the boards). He's improved each year, just not in point totals. This year he'll get 80 pts (40-40)... remember, I said it first.

  3. Part 1 - Michael Ryder's significance to the team

    In his 3 seasons here, he has never given us any reason to think that he has not already peaked and that he will be a one-dimensional thirty goal-scorer for the rest of his career.

    His first season all he did was hustle (and score goals), his second season he started hitting (and scored goals), in this last season he could skate (and score goals). Also during last season he started actually skating with the puck, something he wasn't able to do in his first two season (not without being rubbed out along the boards). He's improved each year, just not in point totals. This year he'll get 80 pts (40-40)... remember, I said it first.

  4. I'd say the Habs weakness is that they don't have a blue chip prospect...I suppose Price qualifies but there is not real superstar position player in waiting within the Habs system. They have quality and depth, and one may develop into that superstar but currently there is no stand out position player that makes you say "wow". JMHO.

    Corey Locke.

  5. Latendresse - Koivu - Ryder

    Lahti - Smolinski - Kovalev

    Higgins - Plekanec - Kostitsyn

    Begin - Lapierre - Streit

    Markov - Komisarek

    Hamrlik - O'Byrne

    Bouillon - Dandenault

    Huet

    Halak

    As of right now, it seems that this is the most likely scenario. Another option is using Grabovski as 2nd line LW and then shifting Streit to defence. Also, this depends on O'Byrne being ready.

    As much as I don't like it (I really want to see Latendresse-Smolinski-Ryder and hate the idea of the Bouillon-Dandenault pairing) that seems to be a really probable lineup.

  6. The word from Bleu, Blanc et Rouge now is that Gainey may be interested in Nagy and possibly Bertuzzi and Yashin.

    http://onveutlacoupe.blogspot.com/

    Nagy wouldn't be too bad, but I don't understand Bertuzzi... we're stacked at RW as it is. Yashin can be good or bad: 2 years, play him with Kovalev and pray. A better option would be Handzus. LW is by far are most pressing need... I really hope we do something about it.
  7. Injuries aside, I'd take Handzus over him, because he seems to be a better role player if he doesn't work out as one of the top C's. Zubrus is such a gamble for our team. I just don't see the benefit.
    You're probably right. For some reason I had it in my head that he was looking for 5-6 million a year and had been discounting him because I didn't want to see us overpay like that, but for 4 a year, he's just catapulted to the top of my list. Four years at 16 million, for a Super-Bonk? Damn right. So who do you think would play on his LW (RW Kovalev)? Latendresse? How about Zubrus?
  8. X-Lapierre-Ryder

    X is:

    Latendresse - physical line

    Lahti - give Ryder power play time and he'll still get his 30 goals.

    Higgins - unlikely to break up HPK, either Lats ot Lahts could take his place

    I really want to see Koivu-Kovalev, and I think Ryder could do well with Lapierre as long as he's given someone to work with on the opposite wing.

  9. Why doesn't anybody realize that you won't see this guy in Montreal for like 3 or years. Half the players you guys are mentioning will probably not even be in Montreal in 4 years time.
    I take it you don't think that Latendresse and Chipchura will be in Montreal in 4 years?
  10. If we take him he's Ribs, if we pass on him he's Vinny.

    We winded up with two very good players. Pacioretty is a guy who does everything right but just lacks consistency. Could be interesting playing opposite Latendresse with a center like Plekanec between them.

    More likely to play with Chipchura and Latendresse. That'll be a big mean line.

  11. He was a -7 with 1 goal the first half of the season while playing about 15 minutes per game.

    The second half he was +4 with 5 goals same playing time.

    But by his own admission he played much better in the 2nd half, he also potted 2 goals in the playoffs.

    I thought everyone here had agreed that +/- is a meaningless stat. We'd have to rewatch the entire season to prove what I'm talking about, because being in position is not a stat.

×
×
  • Create New...