Jump to content

Neech

Member
  • Posts

    4503
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    42

Posts posted by Neech

  1. Who's the man who is such a goddamned moron that he can't stop taking offensive zone penalties that suck the life out of his team. No, check that...who's the man who takes TWO such penalties, like a Useless Little Bastard???

    This clown can't put 3 consecutive decent games together....I really do hate his F-ing guts. :angry:

    You might want ask about a Prozac prescription, you seem a little OCD with your Koivu-rage.

    .... :wacko: better not let Neech see that - he might say Sak was taking the two penalties to actually help the Habs. You know, cause thats what a "good" captain does. :clap:

    What? So because I dismantled your little arguments you feel the need to make childish remarks about me indirectly? It must have really stung deep, I guess.

  2. We outplayed the Blow Jobs (aharharhar) in pretty much every aspect of the game except in goal. Price made a few big stops, but the goals were weak as hell, especially the second one.

    The skaters were OK, I think Lapierre was the best forward for most of the game who was not on the Kovalev line, besides his turnover on the third goal. He was skating, checking and shooting well. Kovy and co. created a bunch of chances, and I don't know how Plex missed the open net on that perfect set-up by Markov. Damn, that Marky of ours gets me excited sometimes, he can be a magician.

    I liked how our boys were hitting, and we apparently were about 50/50 with them on face-offs as well, and they're a very good face-off team.

    Koivu sucked ass tonight. There were the penalties, of course. And it wasn't quite like earlier in the season when he seemed washed up and useless. He was trying things tonight, but they all invariably failed. I'm convinced that if A Kost and Plex were out with Kovy on that 5 on 3 instead of Ryder and Koivu that we would have had a goal there.

    All in all it was two points that we should have had, but I didn't and still don't believe that we're going to overtake Ottawa for the division or conference. The best we can hope is that we don't draw the Devils or the Rangers in the first round.

  3. Vaguely related to this.

    Has any player in the league re-negotiated a contract for less money sine the lockout? Anyone know?

    Obviously thinking of Richards here, not suggesting he would, but just curious.

    You can't renegociate contracts according to the CBA, I think. And you can only talk about extensions before or during the final year of the deal.

  4. Me neither, if these guys develop into their potential Montreal will have a ridiculously tight defense that is tough and can move the puck.

    Price would be insulated and Montreal could start choking out opponents again.

    That is how you win championships, and that is all I care about. Bore me to tears if I get to watch Stanley Cup parades.

    The thing is that we wouldn't necessarily be playing a boring style, in fact I highly doubt we would. We just have a really competent group of defenders, and it would probably make us more exciting to watch because of the great passing. I look forward to seeing what our blueline looks like in four years.

    I hope we don't give away future all-stars.

  5. I'm not sure about that. I've been to a couple of games and they're great in the pre-game at 6pm. Very supportive of each other. Everything you read about the character of both guys shows them both to be genuinely nice people. A couple of my buddy's talked to Price at Hamilton airport on his recent return (got me an autograph) and both said he was a really nice, sincere, humble guy.

    Oh, I'm sure they get along, and are even friends of a sort. I also get the impression that they're both level-headed guys, humble and not assholes, and wouldn't be causing problems with each other. But your comment was that they were like long lost friends - you were probably being hyperbolic here - but I bet Price is better friends with several of the guys on the team than Huet (keep in mind there's a 12 year age difference). He probably misses his roomie Kyle.

  6. All those words sound really nice and everything, but you can't argue with numbers and facts. What I said is based on numbers and facts, and I will stick to it until I see them change. 20 years is a long time to have Europeans in the game. The fact is Canadians are the best hockey players in the world. That's it period, end of story.

    Here are some facts about pre 05-06 Tampa Stanley cup champs.

    No, you're the one saying words that 'sound nice and everything' - 'Canadians are the best hockey players in the world.' Well shucks, tell that to the Russians, Finns and Swedes who might not agree based on our Olympic showing. I'm not trying to be too argumentative here, I do agree that Canada is the number one hockey nation in the world, but what you said is nothing more than patriotic chest-thumping.

    02-03 New Jersey Devils: 10 Canadians, 9 Americans, 4 Europeans. Captain (Scott Stevens)

    01-02 Detroit Red Wings: 12 Canadians, 1 American, 10 Europeans. Captain (Steve Yzerman)

    00-01 Colorado Avalanche: 13 Canadians, 3 Americans, 7 Europeans. Captain (Joe Sakic)

    99-00 New Jersey Devils: 12 Canadians, 6 Americans, 5 Europeans. Captain (Scott Stevens)

    I'm getting tired of looking for stats, but you need more North Americans on your team .

    I'm not arguing that Europeans have helped the game, and play key roles, but facts are facts.

    Yeah, they're numbers and facts, but you're being narrow-minded in your judgment of them. It's like saying 15 years ago "Europeans just can't lead the league in scoring, yeah they can be good, but the best scorers are all Canadian. End of story, facts are facts."

    You know what the FACT is? 71% of NHL players are North American, so the majority of players on almost every team is North American. And as I said, it makes sense that North Americans become captains more often by default because A. there are more of them and B. you generally want your captain to identify with and represent the majority of your players. Also, only 1 captain won a Cup each year in the last 20 years. Europeans only started to become captains recently, and they are still in the minority in that regard. The reason why a Euro captain hasn't won the Cup yet is more due to timing and circumstance than any intrinsic lack of leadership that they suffer or something.

    Like Wamsley said, it was the good ole Canadian boys who were laying the egg in last year's final for Ottawa, not their Euro captain. It isn't Nik Lidstrom's fault that he hasn't had a decent goaltender since he's been the captain, or that stat might be history already. I'm sure you'll see a European captain win a Cup within the next decade at most.

  7. He's a little streaky though. Plus he's a set-up guy. I do like him though. I am gonna start getting called Don Cherry, but I also like that he is Canadian. I like our team right now, but they are a little too Euro to win the cup. This trend could change, but it hasn't yet. For some reason, Canadian Captains and teams with high percentage of Canadians always win the cup.

    The Habs are a little too a lot of things to win the Cup, and Euro is pretty far down the list.

    Europeans have only been in the NHL in any prominence for a bit over two decades, and it makes sense that since they are in the minority compared with North Americans they are the captains less often. So I don't buy the whole 'only Canadian/American captains win the Cup' blurb, because the circumstances just haven't come about yet for it to occur. And teams with high percentages of Canadians have won it recently, with Tampa, Carolina and Anaheim, but that isn't always the case and most Cup-winners before the lockout had several key Euros who they couldn't have done without.

    Gainey has a press conference tomorrow at 10:45 am.

    !!!!! I might wake up early for that! Or not.

    *raps fingers on desk in anticipation*

  8. No this is 2 more point lost by Huet he must be the worst clutch goalie in the league.

    Price better start Saturday or I will puke.

    Yeah, he was bad, I agree. But we wouldn't have been in the game if it weren't for Pittsburgh's bad goal-tending, so it kind of evens out. They managed to get more shots on net which was the difference. We had plenty of open nets that we couldn't bury.

    I agree that Price should and probably will start on Saturday, but Huet has rebounded from bad games pretty well before. He doesn't deserve the next start, but Price doesn't deserve it that much either.

  9. I could see either goalie start in our next game but if we're following the "win and you're in" system than Price should get the next start.

    Yup, neither's playing well enough to deserve the job. It's a time like this where I'd like to see Halak, but I don't want Price sent down, so the only way of seeing him would be Huet getting traded. I'm not saying that I want to see him go, but it's looking like he's not really seizing the number one job, in which case he is expendable.

  10. To people saying Huet lost this one, yeah he was bad. But Sabourin stunk as well. Neither made a big save, but the Penguins managed to get a few more shots on goal to get an extra one in. We also missed a few open nets.

    What is this new Habs team we have, a potent offense held back by crappy goal-tending? Is this bizarro world?

    It was really the Komisarek pass that did us in, right when Malkin scored that I had a sinking feeling that they would take the lead. I also had a bad feeling when the fans were taunting Malkin, I knew that would come back to bite us in the ass. Taunt the goalie, people, not the leading scorer in the league, too bad Sabourin's name has three syllables I guess.

    It was nice to see Lapierre fight, his crouch position was kind of funny but he held his own, despite getting his shirt all torn up by Talbot who is obviously a whore.

    Our top lines weren't really clicking, A. Kosty had a down game, and Higgins as well (despite his goal). Koivu was looking good again. Lats is getting there. Ryder is playing his best hockey of the season, but he's always been streaky.

    All in all, it was a loss, but not a big deal at all. We got behind, but fought back. Our goal-tending was crappy but so was theirs, it would have been a 3-2 game with guys playing well in nets. Price should probably get the start on Saturday, but it's no big rush to go back to the guy who was pulled in the first two days ago. We just need to play a bit smarter at times as a team.

  11. spacer.jpggame33-pix4.jpg

    :lol:

    That picture is too funny. They're bum chums!

    Anyways, I'm half expecting our guys to come out sloppy, the crowd will be rockin before the first puck drop and it might be hard to focus. We just have to keep our feet under us, and work hard. We better not let another no-name career-backup home-town boy come in and shut us out again.

    My prediction: 4-3 win. Goals by Kovalev, Latendresse, Higgins, A. Kostitsyn

  12. Eh, three more years at 7.8 million doesn't look so good for Richards... On the other hand, we seem to have pretty good scoring as it is, and he's a good two-way forward who has proven to be clutch. And that's the sort of price tag that someone like Hossa would require, except for 6 more years or something.

    Anyways, it's probably a moot point because this deal seems very one-sided.

  13. This is the best Habs team I've ever cheered for, and I love it. These are guys that I've been following more or less since they were drafted, and it's awesome to see them come together and progress like this. I want to see them lift a Cup or two or three in the next decade.

×
×
  • Create New...