Jump to content

Numbers to be retired (October 15)....


shortcat1

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by Mark Napier

Hey I loved Mats.  He was one of my all time favourites.  As to Gainey I would consider him one of the all time greats.  Doesn't the best defensive forward of all time deserve to have his number retired as much as the best offensive player of all time??  Surely his job was not as glamourous as the offensive types but he was responsible for more wins than a lot of 40 or 50 goal scorers.  Being a defensive specialist is a dirty job that is not appreciated by your typical fan.  Just look at all the people that would have Sunstrom traded for a bag full of broken sticks.  I guess Gainey suffers the fate of all defensive specialists in that he doesn't get the recognition he deserves. But in my eyes, preventing a goal is just important as scoring one although it's not as exciting.

I don't know if my eyes would fully agree with that idea but they certainly see things the same way as you with regards to the validity of retiring Gainey's number because of his all-round impact on the Canadiens in particular but also on the whole NHL as well.

I don't think his number will be retired now because of his presence as the GM of the Canadiens. When he retires, then it's more likely that it will because of the above reasons and, in addition, due to his having been the GM.

:hlogo::ghg::hlogo:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are announcing the number's tomorrow...

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=13972...722&hubname=nhl

I'll be...

#19 (cuz he should already be hanging up there)

#33 (cuz he's the best goalie to have ever played the game and I'm sure theirs a lot of pressure all around the league, plus they need to beat the avs to the punch)

#28 (cuz he actually did more for the habs than #33 and it would be huge slap in his face to hang #33 and not #28)

They are apparently gonna retire more over the next few seasons, leading up to Centennial 2009. One will be #23. I don't think he'll let them honour him this season. Won't want to jinx himself, by glorifying past success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by TheMaxDaddy

#33 (cuz he's the best goalie to have ever played the game and I'm sure theirs a lot of pressure all around the league, plus they need to beat the avs to the punch)

I'm pretty sure that the Avs have already retired #33. I think they did it in their first game after Roy retired. I might be wrong though... But I agree, I thought Roy's number should have been retired the day he retired. We need to get Roy back on the Habs good side, who knows when we'll need a new goalie coach...

As for the other numbers this year, I think that Robinson and Cournoyer/Moore should be retired.

Also, retire #11, even though Koivu is still playing. With what he's gone through with the cancer, and coming back, and all he's done for the city. He deserves it. Plus, I think Mario's # is retired in Pittsburgh, but he's wearing it.

:ghg:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by MexicanChannel

We need to get Roy back on the Habs good side, who knows when we'll need a new goalie coach...

Also, retire #11, even though Koivu is still playing. With what he's gone through with the cancer, and coming back, and all he's done for the city. He deserves it. Plus, I think Mario's # is retired in Pittsburgh, but he's wearing it.  

:ghg:

great players dont often make great coaches (see Maurice Richard, Babe Ruth), although there are exceptions (e.g. Toe Blake). I wonder if Roy is the kind of guy who would be a good goalie coach, although I imagine we will find out soon enough.

Lemieux's number was retired because he retired. I believe when he came back the penguins took down the number. Irrespective, Lemieux is one of the greatest players in the history of hockey, while koivu is a pretty good pivot who has perservered though adversity. The rules are a little different.

[Edited on 10/14/2005 by simonus]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by MexicanChannel

Plus, I think Mario's # is retired in Pittsburgh, but he's wearing it.  

:ghg:

He's also in the HOF. Are they supposed to un-retire the jersey when the player un-retires?

Retire #11 when he retires, but he'd better win a cup or two first. The habs don't hang banners for winning the Presidents or Wales Trophy's. They better not hang a # the rafters w/o a cup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by TheMaxDaddy

They are announcing the number's tomorrow...

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=13972...722&hubname=nhl

I'll be...

#19 (cuz he should already be hanging up there)

#33 (cuz he's the best goalie to have ever played the game and I'm sure theirs a lot of pressure all around the league, plus they need to beat the avs to the punch)

#28 (cuz he actually did more for the habs than #33 and it would be huge slap in his face to hang #33 and not #28)

They are apparently gonna retire more over the next few seasons, leading up to Centennial 2009. One will be #23. I don't think he'll let them honour him this season. Won't want to jinx himself, by glorifying past success.

I read that article and, when I got to the bottom, I noticed a feedback section. The first guy called for this guy's number to be retired:

"CLAUDE LEMIEUX!! I hope they retire #32. The greatest playoff performer of all time! Truly one of the greats."

I thought, at first, that he was kidding but, upon reading it over again, the spirit of the comment is truly serious.

Claude Lemieux.... hmmm.... performer, yes..... retire his number..... hmmmm............................. I'll have to think on that one for a while...... maybe quite a while......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Dalhabs

33 should be retired just to get it over with and let the Roy curse out of the city.

Interesting perspective.

I've never thought of a 'Roy curse' on Montreal. I always thought of their dark days being a result of the consequences of the decisions of those in charge of the team and those who directly affect the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More on Claude Lemieux.

Some of the responses, in jest, aside from calling him/her nuts, add the names of:

Kjell Dahlin, Ed Ronan, Steve Penney, Gilbert Dionne, Jean Jacques Daigneault, Serge Boisvert, Sergio Momesso, 'Red Light' Racicot' & John Kordic (I feel badly about this man... he got caught in a stereotype vortex).

Some of the more serious but won't happen names are:

Chris Nilan, Bunny Laroque, Claude Provost (he's a SERIOUS dark horse), the Mahovlich brothers, Mats Naslund, Guy Carbonneau (one day, maybe).

Of these guys, Claude Provost is a legitimate candidate ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Provost ).

By the way, Leafs 5, Thrashers, 0 halfways through the 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...