TurdBurglar Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 2 hours ago, tomh009 said: I can accept the result of the first review: based on how the rules are written, it's a valid goal. (And even if it were not, there would have been a Chicago PP or penalty shot.) The result of the offside review is much more questionable, though, and a big part of that, too, is how the rule is written: it's not always obvious from a video replay whether the player is "in control" of the puck when crossing the line. I thought he wasn't, but clearly the review team thought otherwise. Considering he didn’t touch the puck at all until his rear skate was barely still touching the blue line, I’m not sure how anyone can think he had control. In real time, which they are supposed to watch the play in as well, it looked like it wasn’t even close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfredoh2009 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 1 hour ago, TurdBurglar said: Considering he didn’t touch the puck at all until his rear skate was barely still touching the blue line, I’m not sure how anyone can think he had control. In real time, which they are supposed to watch the play in as well, it looked like it wasn’t even close. you must be KK KK fan ! KK KK reaps what KK KK sows, I say: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.