Pierre the Great Posted October 11, 2006 Author Share Posted October 11, 2006 I agree 5 out of 8 to start the season on the road is very good. Nope didn't see the game. Heard it on the old internet radio. Canucks need to get better on the penalty kill. From the guys on the radio it looks like Kesler has some kind of head injury. Concussion? The radio guys still don't know what's wrong with Salo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsniper Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 wow!! did u see numelin and koivu goals? naslund's was nice too Thought Naslund's was stopped at first. Numelin's was insane considering he's a d-man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Stealth Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Thought Naslund's was stopped at first. Numelin's was insane considering he's a d-man. The Blues, Canucks and Wild were all after Nummy in the offseason. Minny beat us out and I knew they got a gem. BTW, knowing our luck(look at Rolston's goal) we'll never get a shutout. :puke: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pierre the Great Posted October 11, 2006 Author Share Posted October 11, 2006 Salo-pulled groin should be fine for the weekend Keslar- Head injury Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark_faerie87 Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 We've got the best goalie in the game. I highly disagree on that point. Besides, it's not just about the goalie. Bulis lets the team down. tough game. should have won it. Why didn't we use H. Sedin instead of Bulis? Bulis let the team down. Come on, it was Bulis! What were you expecting? wow!! did u see numelin and koivu goals? They're Finnish, what can I say? :king: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pierre the Great Posted October 11, 2006 Author Share Posted October 11, 2006 I highly disagree on that point. Besides, it's not just about the goalie. Come on, it was Bulis! What were you expecting? They're Finnish, what can I say? :king: He's the best skills wise. I mean look at all the shots he's taking. He's getting attacked attacked attacked. The canucks don't have the greatest defense. Then remember the colorado game. Without him the avs would have scored 6 goals with all those power plays. LOL BTH ain't gonna be happy. Yeah you and the fins I guess there's too many swedes on the Canuck roster then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Stealth Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Should have used Henrik....... BTW Faerie, how come ur not worried when Salo got hurt. You should be ashamed of yourself...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pierre the Great Posted October 11, 2006 Author Share Posted October 11, 2006 Thats what I thought. Why not use him instead of Bulis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsniper Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 He's the best skills wise. I mean look at all the shots he's taking. He's getting attacked attacked attacked. The canucks don't have the greatest defense. Then remember the colorado game. Without him the avs would have scored 6 goals with all those power plays. LOL BTH ain't gonna be happy. Yeah you and the fins I guess there's too many swedes on the Canuck roster then. No he's not, Luongo is 2nd or 3rd. Kipper is easily the best in the game. You overestimate our powerplay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark_faerie87 Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 He's the best skills wise. I mean look at all the shots he's taking. He's getting attacked attacked attacked. The canucks don't have the greatest defense. Then remember the colorado game. Without him the avs would have scored 6 goals with all those power plays. LOL BTH ain't gonna be happy. Yeah you and the fins I guess there's too many swedes on the Canuck roster then. Luongo has the best goalie skills? According to who? And just because he faces lots of shots, doesn't mean he's good. Quantity over quality doesn't mean a whole lot of anything aside from the fact that he's getting his exercise. Moreover, how does he do when he faces very few shots? For all we know, he could have poor focus. I only respect two players on the Canucks. Any guesses as to who they are? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pierre the Great Posted October 11, 2006 Author Share Posted October 11, 2006 ummm nope don't know the two players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Stealth Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 No he's not, Luongo is 2nd or 3rd. Kipper is easily the best in the game. You overestimate our powerplay. We played poorly man. Mitchell etc stood and watched Robbie make 2 saves. Coverage was crap, so Vigneault benched em and they played MUCH better today. I still think Kipper is better though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsniper Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Luongo has the best goalie skills? According to who? And just because he faces lots of shots, doesn't mean he's good. Quantity over quality doesn't mean a whole lot of anything aside from the fact that he's getting his exercise. Moreover, how does he do when he faces very few shots? For all we know, he could have poor focus. I only respect two players on the Canucks. Any guesses as to who they are? I can't help but think of a mid-90s Felix Potvin. He faced and stopped a ton of rubber for Toronto but sucked as soon as he left (well, was decent in La La Land atleast). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Stealth Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Luongo has the best goalie skills? According to who? And just because he faces lots of shots, doesn't mean he's good. Quantity over quality doesn't mean a whole lot of anything aside from the fact that he's getting his exercise. Moreover, how does he do when he faces very few shots? For all we know, he could have poor focus. I only respect two players on the Canucks. Any guesses as to who they are? Salo and Santala but you haven't showed respect for Salo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pierre the Great Posted October 11, 2006 Author Share Posted October 11, 2006 yeah of course you like the two fins on the team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark_faerie87 Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Salo and Santala but you haven't showed respect for Salo. I'm still pissed at him for getting injured last time! Completely different gold medal game if he was in the lineup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pierre the Great Posted October 11, 2006 Author Share Posted October 11, 2006 I'm sure he wanted to get injured during the olympics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Stealth Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 I'm sure he wanted to get injured during the olympics. I know.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark_faerie87 Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 I'm sure he wanted to get injured during the olympics. You didn't actually think I was being serious, did you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAK Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 They're Finnish, what can I say? :king: are u a finnish fearie ?? I have to agree that of all the u r peeing players. the finns are my favourite. theres something north american in their style of hockey. that and the fact that I met a finnish girls years ago and she was a real beauty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark_faerie87 Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 are u a finnish fearie ?? I have to agree that of all the u r peeing players. the finns are my favourite. theres something north american in their style of hockey. that and the fact that I met a finnish girls years ago and she was a real beauty. No, I'm not Finnish sadly enough...but I am a Finnophile! :king: As for Finnish hockey players, I agree, I really like their style of play. They do a wonderful job combining grit with finesse. And Finnish accents are hawt! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAK Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 No, I'm not Finnish sadly enough...but I am a Finnophile! :king: As for Finnish hockey players, I agree, I really like their style of play. They do a wonderful job combining grit with finesse. And Finnish accents are hawt! and their last name sound cool. nokelainen, koivu...numminen... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsniper Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Lehtinen, Lehtonen, Vaananen, Hahl. Gotta admit, I like the Fins as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark_faerie87 Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Lehtinen, Lehtonen, Vaananen, Hahl. Gotta admit, I like the Fins as well. Especially sexy Jonne Aaron and Ville Valo! :king: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pierre the Great Posted October 11, 2006 Author Share Posted October 11, 2006 No, I'm not Finnish sadly enough...but I am a Finnophile! :king: As for Finnish hockey players, I agree, I really like their style of play. They do a wonderful job combining grit with finesse. And Finnish accents are hawt! LOL if your a Finnophile then I'm a Canadophile. lol And no I know you were joking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.