BCHabnut

Ugly win. Might be what the dostor ordered. It was funny, on CBC, even PJ Stock commented on the Habs lack of a defensive coach. Bob needs to pull the trigger on two things. An impact player! Centre, wing or Defense. It doesn't matter as much as we think what position it is....IMO. Just someone who can dominate his portion of the ice. We need a freakin defensive coach. Today there were less odd man rushes, but too many open men all over the ice. This is causing them to be tentative when attacking, cuz they are scared of a defensive mistake.

Red is the most dominant colour in the spectrum. This is why stop lights are red. There have been theories that this is why players hit so many posts. Colin is correct. I was wondering who would try it first.

I wish Florida would have scored a few more tonight. A nice 7-1 blowout is what those lazy bums needed.

Wow. That was a stinker. I hope Carbo rips them a new one in english, so I can watch. If you guys find any video of Carbs tearing them apart, please link it here. Worst game of the year by far. Can't blame the refs, coach or Price on this one. I lost count of breakaways. Odd man rushes were at least 30. Phew... Note to Bob. When team is playing well, send long term injury recoverers to Hamilton for conditioning.

I like these lines. I mentioned in another thread that Plek was not just a one dimensional guy. He is strong defensively. Sergei is the only element thaty stops this line from being a potentially strong shut down line. Interesting lines. Too bad Pacioretty is out. I thought he would be the last call up to be scratched. If I were Diago, I would be worried, because I could see Pacioretty making some room for Koivu too. We all know Carbo does this when things get ugly.

I actually like this team more than last years. We have improved greatly at 5 on 5, and I haven't researched the PK, but I think it is much better as well. People complain about lack of a system, and sometimes I agree. I think Carbo sometimes tries to "throw speed at them!" It often works, but it seems like a lot of coaches have our number, and just trap the hell out of us. My biggest disapointment this year is not offensive production or the Power Play. It is the way we give up the blueline and often appear inept in our own zone. I think a reason for this could be that when the play is kept along the boards, and we are not successful at chipping the puck out of our zone, we have left the open ice vacant, because 3 players are lined up along the boards.

I guess what I mean is that Lemairre was not the premierre player on the team. I know you can't compare, but that Habs team was the best ever, and they were not built on a model of bringing up youth, not trading away players for Dionne or Sitler or Clarke, because they were big names. I agree that Lemairre was one of my favorites on the team, but more dominant were Lafleur, Shutt, (although Lemairre ws huge in that line) Gainey, the big three and Dryden. That was the point I was trying to get across. Of course you need a competent centre as #1, but guys like Smith and Lemairre did the job without being the best #1 in the league.

Again Brobin, I ask, was Lemaire a true #1 centre, or elite centre? I don't believe he was. There were much better in the game, but because we had three good fast centres (Lemaire, Mondou, Risbrough) and the best shutdown in the league, (Jarvis) the 70's Habs were a great success. I hate to focus on defense first, but I still think a Holik, Peca, Paullson style centre could be very affective for the team. Obviously Holik and Peca are over the hill, but I'm husing their names as examples. Since those elite centres are so hard to come by, and extremely expensive, I think the focus should still be for a true offensive defenseman, and a shutdown forward that we can build a real 3rd line on. Having said that, I would have no problem dealing any of the centres we have for that elite centre, but 3 roster players, a prospect and 2 picks is out of control. If the price is right, I guarantee Bob will pursue an Impact player. I just don't think he will sell the organization just to get the cup in 2009 for it's centenial. I watched the 96 closing of the forum ceremony today, and it was depressing. It was the beginning of the end and ineptitude was at it's greatest through the whole orginization. If the team hasn't readied itself for a cup this year, I am not willing to give away the team for someone that might help...maybe.

Or put Plek as #2 and trade Koivu. Don't forget that although he may be having an offensive slump, Plek is quite good in his own zone. With the season he's having, he could probably be signed for 3 to 4 million for 3 or four years. I hate to say it, but I think I would rather have that. I love Koivu, and I have become emotionally attached to him as a franchise guy, but unfourunately his best years are behind him, ripe with illness, injury, and the 8 or 9 dark years that the franchise has had in my lifetime. In the 70's we had Lemaire leading at centre. He was also smallish, but he was a clutch guy with two brilliant wingers. But equally important was Jarvis. Risbrough, the agitator. Can Lappiere be th e next Jarvis our team? I don't know. In the 80's we got Bobby Smith. Not an elite, but a big guy with hockey smarts and the ability to use the team around him to win, but we had Carbo. I believe that it's this combination that creates a winning team. Right now we may have that shutdown guy in Lappiere, but Plek could also play that role. I compare Plek to Mondou, and the whole Laps line line to the Risbrough, Tremblay, and Yvon Lambert. I think we can win a cup without an elite centre, but the problem is, we never replaced Carbo. We need EITHER a shut down centre or an elite. Both would be great, but I can't see that. We also needdamn defensive coach. We gotta quit handing over the blueline on a silver platter.

Great first and once again beat by the trap. This team cannot seem to solve the trap. Two of Price's goals, he wasn't tracking the puck very well either, but in the end we got beat by the trap.

I remember Markov's first year, I was wishing he was as good as Danny Markov.

tommorrow night after super skills. Hosted by George Strombolopolopogous.

I think the team identity is there. When they play patient, trap style hockey and keep the puck along the boards until there is a turnover, then use their explosive offense and creativity, the team is hard to play against. I have seen evidence that Carbo does have a system, and that is the system. Play the boards hard and be patient. What I really think the team lacks, is a good system in there own zone when the other team has the puck. They look scattered and passive. Allowing the worst teams to wander in and set up for shots. I've actually questioned if the team needs a defensive coach. You can argue that if Carbo and Jarvis (two extremely good defensive centres) can't do it, who can? I still think having a defenseman behind the bench would be a good thing. When we have the puck in our own zone, we are usually good at chipping it out, or findint the stretch pass, but when the other team has the puck in our zone, the team looks almost lost.

This is a concern for me. I believe we can not be considered a contender unless the team can play a solid system and match up against any team. NJ has always dominated us.

I watched two extremely disciplined system teams with great defense from the Eastern conference tonight. Both of these teams, I feel will go far in the playoffs if they can continue these ways. Those teams were the Devils and the Bruins. :puke: The Habs team that inpressed me the most this year was the one that was patient and played hard on the boards and chipped out of the zone. Habs get handcuffed by defensive teams. They are too much about long high risk cross ice passes to beat the trap. This is what the Devils want. They tried chipping the boards and got beat at that a lot, but they didn't seem to stick close to each other and look for the puck support and short pass when breaking into the zone. The cycle looked good a few times, but the Devils were the better team all around. A little puck luck would have helped too.

1st period was one of the worst I've seen in a while, but 2nd and 3rd, the Habs played well. Price looked good, Patch was awesome tonight, as was Stewart. I like him a lot. He can centre the puck and find the pass. Something none of our other fourth liners can do. Sorry Dandy, Stewart is better. Disapointing loss, but not the worst performance I have seen. Hamrlik was horrible tonight. Another note. I don't want to hear anybody dis Breezy any more this year. He has been great (for what is expected, and what he earns) He seems to playing inspired. He makes some great breakout plays, and has a lot of poise. His first half of the season has been way more than I expected.

Unless there is a good trade for him, I would not trade Chips. I doubt Carbo has anything against Chips. He just can't use him at Centre because his faceoff is weak. I think he is a great prospect, and he should go back to the AHL and work on his faceoff. He will be on the team next year. I doubt Dandy and Begin will be signed, so he can fill in there. I also think he is better than TK, but TK has the heart of a Lion and rarely misses a game. I could see Chips playing with Laps next year to form a fierce shutdown tandem. Not as good as Jarvis and Gainey, but still very good.

I would like to keep Tanguay with Koivu. They were very good together. This looks like a good balanced lineup. Hopefully Laraque doesn't throw a turd in the soup as far as the fourth lines are concerned. The current 3rd line is a pretty good shutdown line.

I know, I've been thinking about that too. All the lines have great chemistry right now. So do you break up your most productive line 5 on 5? Lang has been great and there is chemistry with the brothers. I think the two lines which shouldn't be messed with right now are Lang and brothers, and Laps, Lats, TK. I think Koivu could play with Dags and Kovalev. Plek with Maxpac and begin. This would balance defensive weakness of Dags and especially Maxpac. Koivu and Kovy have never really found a lot of chemistry though.

I thought Stewart had a great game. I hate to say it, but Chipchura might end up as part of a deal to get a mobile D man before the deadline. I like Chips, but he is definitely a work in progress. Maxpac looked great last night too. He dug for pucks and second efforts were many. Nice to see. It's great to see three players (Dags, Stewart, and Maxpac) called up and imediately fitting in to their roles. I really like the chemistry in all of these lines. Also, all four lines had goal scores. I know Kovy scored on the PP, but it's nice to see.

Cooke was put on a line with both Crosby and Malkin, because he has some grit and will stand up for Crosby. Crosby takes a lot of physical abuse.

Go Habs Go

Why are we still talking about Vinny. He's not being traded.

Lapierre does not need to put points up as long as his line continues to play as it does. I like him as a shutdown guy more than Bonk or Smolinski. That's for sure. Lapierre reminds me a lot of young Carbo. It would be nice to see him put up a few more points, but he is doing a great against the opponent's top line.

At least Chips got a few shots in. Kosty gets destroyed every time. He's fought some pretty big boys though. Vinny is pretty good with his fists!