Yes of course, there was contact with the edge of Tarasov's stick, and since the call on the ice was No Goal, then it would surely have not been overturned.
But I'm willing to bet that if the call on the ice was a Good Goal, this very, very light contact would not have been enough to overturn the call.
I found it lame that the ref would call No Goal on the ice for such a minor incident. In my opinion, they should allow almost every goals scored and then get evidence that it should not count.
Not the opposite. Same goes for goals scored with an high stick.