Jump to content

alfredoh2009

Member
  • Posts

    8520
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    66

Everything posted by alfredoh2009

  1. I meant going to the conference finals (3rd round playoffs) ... He He I don't know much about Vejdemo except what I read on this board. I hope he graduates with the Habs
  2. Or maybe he like the weather better down south
  3. Yahoo! Good news ahead of the draft lottery weekend
  4. Great news! I never liked that guy for some reason
  5. Trading two 2nds for Shaw in 2016, a 2nd and a 4th for Petry in 2015 and a second for Vanek in 2014 didn't help our chances Trading a 3rd and 4th to move up for Lernout in 2014 is not panning out . And let's not talk about Vejdemo That 3rd round in 2014 did screw up whatever MB/ TT had done well the first and second years
  6. Thanks, I wanted to re-look at the CH's depth at center to see who may be expendable and who is projecting to be a top 6. I don't know where LV fits on the CH
  7. Does anyone have news on Lukas Vejdemo? Is he trending to be better than DLR? Similar? Or bust out?
  8. Same here, seeing him do his thing on the final minutes and scoring the empty netter to plant the stake at the Bruins' heart : Priceless !
  9. The Habs have been cursed since moving from the old forum I say MB, Lets get some exhorcists to free the club from it
  10. It was Ellis. Pk pinched in to force a play that didn't pan out. I am happy for Sven, like Hudon and Carr: he can provide secondary scoring
  11. In MB's era some 2nd drafts were traded for Vanek, Petry and A.Shaw The other 2nds in the system are progressing well: Lehks, DLR, Ikhonen, etc I don't think short-term playoff tweaks have been more of an issue than drafting
  12. Pipe dream, I'll assume it. ... just making the argument
  13. Commandant, I am just trying to voice the point of view where we go for a reset with the current core (Price/Weber/Pacioretty) within the next 3 years. If we follow this logic and try to Fowler from Anaheim we might have to give up on another potential 30 goal LW who would interest the Ducks. If we go for a rebuild, I agree with you
  14. Beggars can't be choosers , they say
  15. So would Galchenyuk and to a lesser degree Scherbak if they want a prospect with upside and some other pieces
  16. I pray the Ducks implode after their sweep and cough up Fowler to the Habs in a panic move
  17. If Dahlin is not a Hab and Svechnikov is available. I would not mind trading Galchenyuk or Scherbak plus picks/other for à LD
  18. DLR or McCarron, it's all the same to me. I would send those projects to another team (like B.Pouliot and L.Eller bounced around) for picks or prospects L.Shaw and Froese are better suited for our 4th line. Rychel a better option with Deslsuriers
  19. I'm hoping for a Sharks sweep of the Ducks to push the Ducks to be more receptive to trading some of their assets. That may be good for the Habs!
  20. But that is where the CH is now. With a deeper line-up that 2 years ago and some real assets to improve in the short term. Either they play their hand now, or rebuld
  21. If we do not get Dahlin on April 28th. I would trade our 1st, one of our 2nds, and DeLaRose for ROR. That would certainly fix our need at Center
  22. Line-up in 2016 looked something like this: Pacioretty -Galcheynuk -Gallagher Eller -Plekanec -Carr Lessio -Desharnais -Andrighetto Byron -Danault -Mitchell Flynn/Brown Markov -Subban Emelin -Petry Beaulieu -Pateryn Barberio/Bartley/Gilbert Condon/(Price hurt) Lehkonen, Drouin, A. Shaw, and more mature DLR & Danault give us more depth now. Hudon, Scherbak have upside. Lindgren is an improvement over Condon (or at least equivalent). Juulsen, Mete, the new and improved Petry, even Rielly are an improvement over 2016...
  23. I knew that about RFs vs UFAs, but I was hoping that the CH could offer 1 yr deals to some pending RFAs to avoid having to protect them. We will lose a core player in the next next expansion draft for sure. Even if it does not show yet, I think we are deeper than in 2016... I'll check this later to see if I remember correctly
×
×
  • Create New...