sbhatt Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=172350&hubname= Brian Gionta must be kicking himself for not going to arbitration, given what point-per-game type players have been awarded thus far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Stealth Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 Eklund............. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chips Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 Well, if this trend continues; we could be heading for another market correction. ie. NHL and PA dispute over salaries; However, we have not seen a team ask for a player to be taken to arbitration yet. Now, I'd love to see the outcome of that senario. IMO, that would certainly keep the salary payouts respectable; so as to avoid a drop in pay after a crappy season. Do we have any that would fit that category? Who in your opinion would take a player to arbitration? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortcat1 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 That almost equals my teacher's salary.... :king: :hlogo: :king: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 Where do you guys think Gomez will be traded? My guess is a Western team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chips Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 My Guess is that Gomez or Briere will go to Edmonton. Come on Zod don't fail me now. make it happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talon Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 The New Jersey Devils will live with Scott Gomez's $5 million US salary, at least for the time being. Team president and general manager Lou Lamoriello told Toronto's FAN 590 Radio that he will accept the arbitrator's ruling and sign the forward to the one-year contract awarded on Tuesday. http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=172460&hubname=nhl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chips Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 (edited) Jersey has a few more players to sign; apparently they can go like this over the cap by 10% until Oct 4th before the season starts.. so expect a move before then; I see Gomez and another getting the boot out of Jersey. Edited July 27, 2006 by Chips Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Puck Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 However, we have not seen a team ask for a player to be taken to arbitration yet. Now, I'd love to see the outcome of that senario. IMO, that would certainly keep the salary payouts respectable; so as to avoid a drop in pay after a crappy season. Do we have any that would fit that category? Who in your opinion would take a player to arbitration? Not this year but I am sure one team took a player to arbitartion last year. Maybe it was Florida and Luongo? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark_faerie87 Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 Not this year but I am sure one team took a player to arbitartion last year. Maybe it was Florida and Luongo? That sounds familar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsniper Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 Did Buffalo even ever accept Briere's ruling? I don't remember seeing anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Stealth Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 Gomez WILL NOT be traded. Lou has stated he will not trade him. Buffalo doesn't need to make a decision as of the CBA stating that a team doesn't have to make it's decision until 48 hours of it's last case. Buffalo has a few guys they need rulings on so that's why Briere's case has yet to be accepted/declined. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark_faerie87 Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 Gomez WILL NOT be traded. Lou has stated he will not trade him. Buffalo doesn't need to make a decision as of the CBA stating that a team doesn't have to make it's decision until 48 hours of it's last case. Buffalo has a few guys they need rulings on so that's why Briere's case has yet to be accepted/declined. Hmmm, that's not what the TSN article was saying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Stealth Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 Hmmm, that's not what the TSN article was saying. TSN will report stuff.... what r u talking about btw? Gomez or Briere? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark_faerie87 Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 TSN will report stuff.... what r u talking about btw? Gomez or Briere? Err, Briere. Sorry, I should have been more specific. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Stealth Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 Err, Briere. Sorry, I should have been more specific. They have a few others the are awaiting cases so say if Afinogenov is the last one to have a ruling, the Sabres have 48 hours after that one to decide on all their cases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark_faerie87 Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 They have a few others the are awaiting cases so say if Afinogenov is the last one to have a ruling, the Sabres have 48 hours after that one to decide on all their cases. Damnit, so when's their last case? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Stealth Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 No clue. Haven't been paying attention to arbitration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.