Guest Stogey24 Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 Those with a weak stomach, may want to pass on this one. Max-Chuck-Sven Lars-Plek-Matteau JDL-Mac- Byron Mitchell-Danault-Brown Markov-p.k Emelin-Pateryn Bartley-Barberio The drywall wall Ben Scrivens Jamie Benn-Tyler Seguin-Patrick Eaves Mattias Janmark-Jason Spezza- Valeri Nichushkin Antoine Roussel-Cody Eakin-Ales Hemsky Radek Faksa-Vernon Fiddler-Colton sceviour Kris Russell-Alex Goligoski Johnny Oduya-Jason Demers Patrik Nemeth-Jamie Oleksiak Kari Lehtonen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chicoutimi Cucumber Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meller93 Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 How does this team look SO much worse than in September. I mean I knew we had injuries and shipped out a few players but wow. I'm actually laughing aloud at this ??? the futility. Ironically it'll probably be this team that's shuts out Dallas 6-0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbhatt Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 At this point: the more regulation losses, the better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meller93 Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 At this point: the more regulation losses, the better. Preferably 1 goal losses so the team only looks really bad, instead of horse **** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlbalr Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 Eller's out, Lessio's in. It's nice to see Lessio finally get a game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stogey24 Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 What did Bergevin see in Danault. He's clueless in his own end Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miklin Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 blacked out again in the Hamilton area. Remind me again how much more I'm paying the cable company for the red light channel? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlbalr Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 I liked the first couple of minutes for the Habs but that early goal stung. Nice to see Pacioretty get a good bounce to tie it up though. Barberio's having a rough night so far. I know Bartley isn't the best of partners but the solution isn't to keep giving it to Dallas instead of Bartley. Brown's making the most of his limited ice time; he has five hits in four shifts. blacked out again in the Hamilton area. Remind me again how much more I'm paying the cable company for the red light channel? You're only going to get the national games since Hamilton is part of the Toronto viewing market, not Ottawa/Montreal's. (Saturdays, most Wednesdays, plus anything on SN1, SN360, or all four SN channels are the nationally televised games.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toronthab Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 I thought my tv was busted.. we were up 3-2. But then the picture adjusted itself. HAHAHAHAHa/// I soooo feel like a Leaf fan/// but merci le bon Dieu... with us ca change! I sure am a suck for winning... HI miklin.. I picked up the Rogers plan for about 65 bucks as I recall and get all the games on RDS feed. It ain't always pretty, but its always there.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlbalr Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Gee, I miss four straight games and the GDT's are busier. I show up for this one and no one else is around... Montreal played a very good period...for 18 minutes. The first minute (the first half of that, really) and the last minute proved problematic. Lessio played quite well I thought in limited action. Pateryn's standing out in a good way as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toronthab Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 hHahaha! Hi Bri... just tuned in. Glad to hear we played some hockey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stogey24 Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Gee, I miss four straight games and the GDT's are busier. I show up for this one and no one else is around... Montreal played a very good period...for 18 minutes. The first minute (the first half of that, really) and the last minute proved problematic. Lessio played quite well I thought in limited action. Pateryn's standing out in a good way as well. I don't really understand why Lessio was scratched in the first place. The guys sleep is unreal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlbalr Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Danault is 8/10 at the faceoff dot so far. He wasn't the greatest at the draw in Chicago but he seems to have found something with Montreal. 68.4% going into this game (and that will go up if his current percentage tonight holds.) Not bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machine of Loving Grace Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Alexei Emelin: 56 games, 0 goals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stogey24 Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Alexei Emelin: 56 games, 0 goals. and friends. Jkjk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lovett's Magnatones Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Alexei Emelin: 56 games, 0 goals. Sounds good for this team, right? That's what they want, Therrien simply cannot have players looking to create offense. That's when da mistake happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyhasbeen Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Danault is 8/10 at the faceoff dot so far. He wasn't the greatest at the draw in Chicago but he seems to have found something with Montreal. 68.4% going into this game (and that will go up if his current percentage tonight holds.) Not bad. Showed good hands on his goal too. Seems to have really good hand eye. If he keeps those numbers up he could be an important piece going forward. Lucky we have Scrivens in nets our we might actually win one here. He has to have the worst lateral movement in pro hockey, even semi pro. He really is terrible. Two of the goals he demonstrated he cannot get from post A to post B. Plain useless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trizzak Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Galchenyuk might be the only reason to watch this team right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helmethead Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Me thinks that the best thing that ever happened to Chucky was getting clocked in the noggin by his lady friend. Helped him get his mind and priorites off of Instagram and onto the ice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machine of Loving Grace Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 9 goals in 7 games. I'll say it again: Alex Galchenyuk has arrived. He might be on a hot streak that's unlikely to be sustainable but when he comes back down to earth, it isn't gonna be the guy who has trouble hitting the net. Funny how we remove the Danish Anchor and Desharnais and we can still score five goals on the best the West has to offer. I don't think Matteau is the answer but I'll take guys like him and Lessio working their asses off towards the net over Eller and DD just doing circles and not knowing what the heck they are supposed to do with the puck. Galchenyuk healthy next season will hit 60 points no problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meller93 Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Chucky is seriously going 25-30 goals! What a surge. Loved watching him tonight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
habs rule Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 too busy to watch the game. (maybe 5 minutes in total) You know it really is amazing that if you play Galchenyuk he seems to do well. HMMM has Le Genius come up with something? Nahhh he was probably told by Markdowm Mark to play him. Now a real coach would have given him more minutes, better line mates a lot earlier. Le Genius wants him to play defence, when you have a gifted center, it is generally considered a good idea to play him, and give him the right people to play with. That is of course if you understand that scoring goals is actually quite important, rather than taking pride and making excuses about losing 1-0 or 2-1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KoRP Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 What did Bergevin see in Danault. He's clueless in his own end This... I think his tenacity, speed, good size, and age was what he saw in him, I think he is better and has more potential than any 3rd/4th liner we have played for 3-4 years. Matteau had a decent game last night as well. These young guys, add McCarron, and DLR too, hit everything they can hit, when it's there. This "new" physicality has made the team more competitive than it was with Flash, Weisse, Flynn, DD etc. and more inspired to play hard, and actually have the body to play a heavy game, and all on the cheap for next year... I like the new look, younger squad. Imagine if we had our real defense, Petry, Beaulieu, Gilbert... and of course Price. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stogey24 Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 This...I think his tenacity, speed, good size, and age was what he saw in him, I think he is better and has more potential than any 3rd/4th liner we have played for 3-4 years.Matteau had a decent game last night as well. These young guys, add McCarron, and DLR too, hit everything they can hit, when it's there.This "new" physicality has made the team more competitive than it was with Flash, Weisse, Flynn, DD etc. and more inspired to play hard, and actually have the body to play a heavy game, and all on the cheap for next year... I like the new look, younger squad.Imagine if we had our real defense, Petry, Beaulieu, Gilbert... and of course Price. Danault literally stood there and watched the second goal happen. I stopped watching after that, but by the Sound of things he had a decent game overall. too busy to watch the game. (maybe 5 minutes in total) You know it really is amazing that if you play Galchenyuk he seems to do well. HMMM has Le Genius come up with something? Nahhh he was probably told by Markdowm Mark to play him. Now a real coach would have given him more minutes, better line mates a lot earlier. Le Genius wants him to play defence, when you have a gifted center, it is generally considered a good idea to play him, and give him the right people to play with. That is of course if you understand that scoring goals is actually quite important, rather than taking pride and making excuses about losing 1-0 or 2-1. Ya, funny what happens when you play your most talented player, with other talented player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.