fromage Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 Dayum. Calgary gets offensive, finally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Komisarek the Cruncher Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 What the hell was Colorado thinking? Leopold and 2 2nd picks (not even a 1st) for a guy like Tanguay I don't get it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbhatt Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 I wonder if they are looking at replacing Blake with Leopold (offensively), and then using the savings to go after another scorer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mils Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 I wonder if they are looking at replacing Blake with Leopold (offensively), and then using the savings to go after another scorer. No, Blake isn't going anywhere. http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/nhl/...4796092,00.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fromage Posted June 24, 2006 Author Share Posted June 24, 2006 Habs traded the 16th pick to San Jose for the 20th and 53rd pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Electron Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 What the hell was Colorado thinking? Leopold and 2 2nd picks (not even a 1st) for a guy like Tanguay I don't get it... Its Leopold and a 2006 2nd rounder for Tanguary and a conditional 2nd rounder in either 2007 or 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTH Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 Giguere got royally screwed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobRock Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 Is anyone else surprised that Boston dealt Raycroft to Toronto for only Rask? No Jay Harrison, Ian White, no Kyle Wellwood? Raycroft did have a rough sophomore year, but I think Boston could have gotten more than that. And it's not as though the Bruins really needed a young goalie, they have Hannu Toivonen. It's was surprising enough that he went to a divisional rival, but I think Toronto underpaid for him. And someone get a memo to Patrice Bergeron. If you really like it in Boston, don't get into any contract disputes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InsaneHABSfan Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 (edited) Is anyone else surprised that Boston dealt Raycroft to Toronto for only Rask? No Jay Harrison, Ian White, no Kyle Wellwood? Raycroft did have a rough sophomore year, but I think Boston could have gotten more than that. And it's not as though the Bruins really needed a young goalie, they have Hannu Toivonen. It's was surprising enough that he went to a divisional rival, but I think Toronto underpaid for him. And someone get a memo to Patrice Bergeron. If you really like it in Boston, don't get into any contract disputes. I think it was a great deal for Boston. Raycroft is not good at all. I think this was a great deal for Montreal as it keeps the Western star goalies out of Leafland and helps Montreal to get into the playoffs once again. Martin Gerber rumours had him wanting to play for the Leafs and that would of concerned me because he is good, unlike Raycroft. Edited June 25, 2006 by InsaneAVSfan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTH Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 Yes, terrible trade for the Leafs. The Bruins don't make a huge gain because they already have enough goalies but now they have the better player with way better trade value in the future. On the Leafs' side, they traded their best prospect away and STILL have a goalending problem. If you're going to trade Rask then get a Giguere or a Nabokov back. Not an unproven guy who is even less proven with the new rules. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Nasty Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 According to ESPN the Kings offered up Garon, Frolov and Dustin Brown for Nabokov...that is one steep price. SJ didn't make the deal because they were division rivals. If either Frolov or Brown are offered straight up for Aebischer then that is enough to persuade me. Of course this is pure speculation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Komisarek the Cruncher Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 Is anyone else surprised that Boston dealt Raycroft to Toronto for only Rask? No Jay Harrison, Ian White, no Kyle Wellwood? Raycroft did have a rough sophomore year, but I think Boston could have gotten more than that. And it's not as though the Bruins really needed a young goalie, they have Hannu Toivonen. It's was surprising enough that he went to a divisional rival, but I think Toronto underpaid for him. And someone get a memo to Patrice Bergeron. If you really like it in Boston, don't get into any contract disputes. Quite the opposite, Raycroft is a 1 year wonder that is not worth much. I'm suprised Boston got so much in return for him. Thank you Ferguson for making an ass of your self once again and making the Laffs a non-playoff team next year. Looks good for what we will be able to get in return for a better goalie like Aebischer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smon Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 Some possbile trades thrown around yesterday and the day before: The Senators offered Martin Havlat, Ray Emery and Chris Phillips to Florida for Luongo and presumably Krajicek, according to the Ottawa Citizen. The Citizen also reported that on draft day the Senators were offered Vesa Toskala for Havlat.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 The Raycroft trade is a wait and happen to see deal. Can Raycroft rebound? Have to wait. How good is Rask? Have to wait. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsniper Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 Bye bye Tanguay! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Stealth Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 Bye bye Tanguay! Not really much happend. He's just playing in your home city now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsniper Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 I don't care, his bull is Calgary's problem now. Lets see how he does without Sakic or Forsberg to leech off of. Leopold will really help us out, bye bye Breezeby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 I see Brisebois didn't have many allies in Colorado Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsniper Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 I see Brisebois didn't have many allies in Colorado He pretty much killed any chance he had during OT of Game 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 What kind of bull was Tangs pulling? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsniper Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 No work ethic, injury prone, always wanting way more then he was worth, taking forever to sign a contract )lo and behold, hes an RFA right now). And he would only sign 1 year deals so we had to go through the same damn thing every offseason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InsaneHABSfan Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 No work ethic, injury prone, always wanting way more then he was worth, taking forever to sign a contract )lo and behold, hes an RFA right now). And he would only sign 1 year deals so we had to go through the same damn thing every offseason. Plus he was only good when playing with Sakic and Hejduk. When he played with Forsberg he had a good season, but it really was due to Forsberg. He is not a bad player, however I would be surprised to see him break 60 points with Calgary. (They have no playmakers) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsniper Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 Plus he was only good when playing with Sakic and Hejduk. When he played with Forsberg he had a good season, but it really was due to Forsberg. He is not a bad player, however I would be surprised to see him break 60 points with Calgary. (They have no playmakers) Indeed. Unless Calgary goes and gets someone like Arnott or Savard, Tanguay will look very average. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InsaneHABSfan Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 I am surprised that Bob Gainey did not move Ribero with all the G.M.'s at the draft. It would have been interesting to see what team wanted him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athlétique.Canadien Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 Denver Post describes Av's pending cap trouble in 2006-07 Ouch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.