Bigger kids are given a much longer leash, especially with a higher draft pedigree. McCarron's a perfect example. Draft picks in the first couple of rounds whose height starts with a 5 better be pretty special. Which is kind of funny, point me to that long list of successful 6'5" NHLers vs a 5'10" player, even in the modern era.
Blais had more PIM in the series against the Eagles than he did in the entire season! I think he got game misconducts in back to back games, we were at one of the game when he got tossed.
So only rounds 1 and 2 count, now? Or is it top 3, which, as @Commandant mentioned, the Habs are top 2 over the last 4 years in terms of quantify of picks chosen.
Yes, I get the math. But discarding later rounds removes players like Gallagher, Anderson, Evans, Carrier, Montembeault, etc.
In the past 4 years, they've had 39 draft picks. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's 11 more than a team would have without any trades (1 pick per round, 7 rounds, 4 years, 28picks). My guess is that's at least top 5 in the league, I'm too lazy to go count. 16 of those were in the first 3 rounds of each draft. But hey, the cupboard is bare.
Anyway, I guess it's bad when prospects make the NHL because that makes the prospect pool weaker. 🙄
He got hype? Seems like a good kid, but I don't think anyone projected him as a top 4. Most of the mentions on this site were around him being the odd man out most of the time.
I feel like there's a Mailloux disconnect. Was he all of a sudden a top 5/can't miss pick? Did anyone watch him play? Granted, St. Louis must value his potential because Bolduc is not a throwaway player. This feels like the Lehkonen/Barron trade, but in reverse.
I wasn't super duper impressed with Mailloux when I watched the playoffs this year. I know some had good feedback from folks here, but he didn't seem very intelligent on the ice. Of course, take that with a grain of salt from a casual fan.
I am intrigued with Bolduc. Finished the season pretty strong.