Peter Puck

Okay refs can miss seeing something. But here they give Greig a penalty for no reason. That's not missing seeing something, that's making up a penalty to even things up.

I'll go with Jake Evans for the winner. But I am happy just for the OT experience for our young guys.

And the 24-25 winner is illWill who predicted 93 points just 2 more than the Habs final total of 91 points. illWill foresaw A)39-28-7-8 = 93 points B) 5th in division C) 17th in league D) 5 20 goal scorers E) 77 Suzuki points F) 46 Hutson points Reality delivered: A) 40-30-8-3 = 91 points B) 5th in division C) 17th in league D) 4 20 goal scorers E) 89 Suzuki points F) 66 Hutson points illWill is our first 3 time winner!!!

How the hell can the refs not call Pinto for pushing an abandoned stick at the puck. There is no excuse for letting that go.

Columbus can only afford to drop a single point in their last 4 games. If they go 3-1-0 they will finish with 87 points which we currently have. But we would win the tie-breaker against them in that case. NYR, NYI and Detroit have to win out and hope we go 0-4-0 to catch us.

This team needs to learn how to start games.

That first Habs goal brought memories of Lafleur and Shutt on a 2-on-1.

How worried were you every time Kotkaniemi got ahold of the puck?

Both Beck and Mailloux looking good.

Ahh. Thanks.

TSN claiming the pick we got when we traded Allen will become a 2nd if Jake plays 20 games. I thought it was 40 games. 20 looks easy and 40 looks impossible.

I hate complaining about the refs but There were like 3 plays that period where the Wild could have been called and 1 where Montreal could have been called. Of course they were all ignored except the Habs transgression.

I think it is much too early to evaluate Laine. He missed a ton of time and may need a full season to recover his form. But there is no rush.

I am confused by the box score for this game. Maybe someone who watched the game can explain. The box score shows that Simoneau scored at 10:13 of the 2nd period and also that he received a 2 minute minor for goalie interference also at 10:13 of the 2nd period. Did this really happen? I could see scoring and then also getting a roughing penalty after the puck went in. If the interference comes first then surely there should be no goal. If the goal comes first then the play is dead and I don't think goalie interference is prohibited after the whistle. Maybe the box score is wrong? Did anyone here see what happened?

I knew it wasn't sustainable.