Commandant Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 We were down all day and the game has started, so I was waiting for H89, but he doesn't seem to be around. Anyways down 1-0 on a ridiculous goof up by Lindgren and Tatar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDriveFor25 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Why isn’t Price in there? Makes zero sense.. he’s been great, you need the two points, and you’re on home ice.. Just brutal mistake by Lindgren there.. move the damn puck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDriveFor25 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Another ugly goal.. Habs losing 2-0 and have 1 shot on goal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted January 16, 2020 Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 1 minute ago, TheDriveFor25 said: Why isn’t Price in there? Makes zero sense.. he’s been great, you need the two points, and you’re on home ice.. Just brutal mistake by Lindgren there.. move the damn puck. We play Philly tomorrow and then we play Vegas on Saturday. Chicago was the weakest of the four teams as we play 4 games in 6 nights (including a b2b). The backup has to play somewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trizzak Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 6 minutes ago, TheDriveFor25 said: Why isn’t Price in there? Makes zero sense.. he’s been great, you need the two points, and you’re on home ice.. Just brutal mistake by Lindgren there.. move the damn puck. 1 minute ago, Commandant said: We play Philly tomorrow and then we play Vegas on Saturday. Chicago was the weakest of the four teams as we play 4 games in 6 nights (including a b2b). The backup has to play somewhere. Lindgren got a shutout versus Chicago as well. Chicago also coming off a back to back. Plenty of reasons to play Lindgren. Whether it works or it doesn't it's still the right choice. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trizzak Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Poehling playing like he's got a girl in the stands. Got that goal and now he's playing with a ton of confidence. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 What a poop show that was, Nice effort defensively Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habsfan89 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Sorry guys site just opened up for me now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted January 16, 2020 Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 They played a lot better after getting down 2. Sucks that it took getting down 2 to start playing though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habsfan89 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 At work just slowed down now how's the game going? I see we are down 0-2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted January 16, 2020 Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 Danault with a nice goal and we are back in it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted January 16, 2020 Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 I would have challenged that for interfence... the interference when he loses the blocker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trizzak Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Odd sequence to them scoring there, but Domi owes the team a goal. Edit: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott462 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 13 minutes ago, Trizzak said: Odd sequence to them scoring there, but Domi owes the team a goal. He got benched Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 I wonder why Tatar doesnt hit the pine with all his dumb stick penalties Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trizzak Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 6 minutes ago, Chris said: I wonder why Tatar doesnt hit the pine with all his dumb stick penalties He has 3 stick penalties since December 1st. 0 since December 19th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habsfan89 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 24 minutes ago, Trizzak said: Odd sequence to them scoring there, but Domi owes the team a goal. Edit: Like Domi is the only one taking dumb penalties on this team smh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlbalr Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 17 minutes ago, Commandant said: I would have challenged that for interfence... the interference when he loses the blocker. Lindgren was eventually alone in the crease well before the goal was scored (Weber pushed the stick to Lindgren and at that time, he was by himself). If they challenged, I think it would have counted based on the following: 69.1 Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal; or (2) an attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of his goal crease. Lindgren was free to move in his crease on the shot (Dach wasn't in the way). As for the second one, that would be overruled by this: 69.7: Rebounds and Loose Pucks - In a rebound situation, or where a goalkeeper and attacking player(s) are simultaneously attempting to play a loose puck, whether inside or outside the crease, incidental contact with the goalkeeper will be permitted, and any goal that is scored as a result thereof will be allowed. The original play where he lost the blocker was a scramble situation (the simultaneous attempt to play the puck). Yes, there was contact but it could easily have been called incidental and by the time the puck went in, there was clearly no one impeding his ability to stop the shot. There isn't anything in there for contact knocking off equipment. Considering the goalie interference section is several pages long, that might be something that could stand to be better defined. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott462 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Shitty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chicoutimi Cucumber Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 This game basically boils down to injuries. The Habs had lots of chances - they seem to have good cohesion in the O-zone and their speed gets them opportunities - but those chances are going to guys who can't hit the broad side of a barn, like Weal, Cousins, Lehknonen, Mete, etc.. Put Gally, Drouin, even Armia back in the lineup and we probably have more than one goal, at which point the entire complexion of the game changes. The other thing is comical defensive breakdowns. I don't know what's with this group, but that's been happening all season and shows little sign of abating. Put a bunch of cement-hands up front and chronic lapses into confusion in the D-zone, and hey presto, a lottery team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted January 16, 2020 Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 Need a better backup as well, Lindgren is just not good enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 They scored 1 freaking goal, what does a back up goalie have to do with hat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habsfan89 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 10 minutes ago, Chris said: They scored 1 freaking goal, what does a back up goalie have to do with hat Stop the other 4 goals lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neech Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 46 minutes ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said: The other thing is comical defensive breakdowns. I don't know what's with this group, but that's been happening all season and shows little sign of abating. Petry has always been gaffe-prone. We're seeing that Chiarot is of a similar mould, maybe worse. Weber too, to a lesser extent. Maybe our best defenders are just good for a few glaring miscues per game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.