Jump to content

Game 39 - Canadiens vs Rangers - 7 p.m. - January 6, 2024


GHT120

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said:

 

Yah, get rid of the shootout. It was a sop to fans after the lockout, it has nothing to do with the team sport of hockey, and a lot of people around the league don’t like it.  


if it were me I’d make each game worth 3 points and make the damn shootout 5 shot minimum a la soccer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Commandant said:

I still.prefer the extra point of the shootout rather than a tie game and each teams getting 1 point.

 

Id go to 3 points for a regulation win though 


Regulation win 3 points

3v3 win 2 points with 1 point going to the loser. 
 

Same applies for the shootout

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Helmethead said:


Regulation win 3 points

3v3 win 2 points with 1 point going to the loser. 
 

Same applies for the shootout

Like the PWHL, I am for it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, alfredoh2009 said:

Like the PWHL, I am for it!

*****IF***** the quick spreadsheet I just ran is correct, based on points, that would put the Habs 6th worst in the NHL; 5th based on Pts% ... Montreal currently has the 2nd fewest regulation wins in the NHL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GHT120 said:

*****IF***** the quick spreadsheet I just ran is correct, based on points, that would put the Habs 6th worst in the NHL; 5th based on Pts% ... Montreal currently has the 2nd fewest regulation wins in the NHL.

It's worth noting, though, that three points for a regulation win will change many teams' tactics late in regulation, particularly when a game is tied, so the results won't be quite identical. 😊

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tomh009 said:

It's worth noting, though, that three points for a regulation win will change many teams' tactics late in regulation, particularly when a game is tied, so the results won't be quite identical. 😊

COMPLETELY agree ... but trying to predict HOW is a fools errand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Commandant said:

I still.prefer the extra point of the shootout rather than a tie game and each teams getting 1 point.

 

Id go to 3 points for a regulation win though 

10000% right.   If they ever bring back tie games, I'm cancelling my season tickets for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Commandant said:

I still.prefer the extra point of the shootout rather than a tie game and each teams getting 1 point.

 

Id go to 3 points for a regulation win though 

To be REALLY radical, and with absolutely no chance it ever happens, 3 points for a regulation win, 2 points for an O/T win and 1 point for a shootout win ... with ZERO loser points ... true incentive to win in regulation and in O/T ... no "we've at least got a point" after 60 minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, GHT120 said:

To be REALLY radical, and with absolutely no chance it ever happens, 3 points for a regulation win, 2 points for an O/T win and 1 point for a shootout win ... with ZERO loser points ... true incentive to win in regulation and in O/T ... no "we've at least got a point" after 60 minutes.

Better yet. 2 regulation. 1 OT and SO. Neither are team hockey. 0 for losing.  OTL points are stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, GHT120 said:

To be REALLY radical, and with absolutely no chance it ever happens, 3 points for a regulation win, 2 points for an O/T win and 1 point for a shootout win ... with ZERO loser points ... true incentive to win in regulation and in O/T ... no "we've at least got a point" after 60 minutes.

I agree ... and disagree. The same number of total points makes sense. Now, change it to be five points for a win, four for OT win and three for SO win. Two for SO loss or one for OT loss. Each step gets you closer to a tie, really (even if we don't have ties any more).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, GHT120 said:

To be REALLY radical, and with absolutely no chance it ever happens, 3 points for a regulation win, 2 points for an O/T win and 1 point for a shootout win ... with ZERO loser points ... true incentive to win in regulation and in O/T ... no "we've at least got a point" after 60 minutes.

 

One of the reasons I want 3 points for a win is that I'm not a huge fan that some games are worth 3 points and some are worth 2.  I'd like every game to result in the same number of total points awarded. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Commandant said:

One of the reasons I want 3 points for a win is that I'm not a huge fan that some games are worth 3 points and some are worth 2.  I'd like every game to result in the same number of total points awarded. 

Understand and generally agree ... I would just like to increase the incentive to win as soon as possible ... I believe it would make close games more exciting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Commandant said:

 

One of the reasons I want 3 points for a win is that I'm not a huge fan that some games are worth 3 points and some are worth 2.  I'd like every game to result in the same number of total points awarded. 

That's true. Every game should have e the same amount of points. It's the biggest argument for 321 vs 210

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...