Jump to content
dlbalr

Permanent Trade Proposal Thread

Recommended Posts

Maybe Florida moves Bjugstad for a couple of picks.. recoup some of the cost of the Hoffman addition. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, TheDriveFor25 said:

If Bennett isn’t what they expected and has become a spare part, they’re getting three for the price of one. 

 

If if there is a player they like in the 2nd round, maybe they do it as they have no picks in the first three rounds. If a player with a high grade from them falls, they might be more willing to make a trade.

 

I wouldn't say Bennett is at the level of a spare part though.  He is an established NHL regular and they're no doubt hoping that a new voice behind the bench will help get him going.  I'm not a big Bennett fan but I think he could get around 35 points next year.   If I'm Calgary, I'd rather hold onto that than take a flyer on Scherbak, a d-man they have no need for considering what they have in their system, and the second rounder.  I like Scherbak but I don't think his trade value is particularly high at the moment.

 

I could see Calgary showing interest in a 2nd given their current situation but that would probably be a deal for an already-drafted prospect more than an established roster player. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If theres a center we should go after in a trade I would go after Pageau. I have always liked the way he plays and he's a habs killer. Might have to be one of those 3 way deals like we just saw with Hoffman, because I don't see Ottawa trading with us. I think

lehkonen-Pageau-Shaw  could be a really good line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about this for a trade

 

To Carolina 

Pacioretty, one of our 2nd round picks 

 

To habs

Skinner , Hanifin 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Metallica said:

How about this for a trade

 

To Carolina 

Pacioretty, one of our 2nd round picks 

 

To habs

Skinner , Hanifin 

Why would the canes swap a younger goal scorer for pacs and give up hanafin for a 2nd? Try maxpac, 2 2nds and jhullson and maybe that deal happens - without still addressing our most pressing need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, hab29RETIRED said:

Why would the canes swap a younger goal scorer for pacs and give up hanafin for a 2nd? Try maxpac, 2 2nds and jhullson and maybe that deal happens - without still addressing our most pressing need.

I was just trying to ball park it, I know more had to be given, but hey that's just to get talks going lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Draft Zadina or Tkachuk at 3, Trade Pacs and a 2nd to Edmonton for Klefbom and 10 then draft the Koktaniemi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

9 minutes ago, TheDriveFor25 said:

Draft Zadina or Tkachuk at 3, Trade Pacs and a 2nd to Edmonton for Klefbom and 10 then draft the Koktaniemi

 

I don't think you'll get Kotkaniemi at 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Commandant said:

 

 

I don't think you'll get Kotkaniemi at 10

Zadina, Kotkaniemi, Tkachuk are all going top 5.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sold on Tkachuk top 5.  Only by the Coyotes. Otherwise,  I think he'll go 8th.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see an analytics based organization like the Coyotes taking tkachuk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Commandant said:

I don't see an analytics based organization like the Coyotes taking tkachuk

Same here.  Just hoping for them that the team franchise history will not come into play tomorrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pacioretty
2018 3rd oa
Juulsen
2019 1st


ROR
2018  1st oa

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, JoeLassister said:

Pacioretty
2018 3rd oa
Juulsen
2019 1st


ROR
2018  1st oa

might have replace Juulsen for Weber or CP but yeah I would do that quickand fast :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With and the rummors of a trade between LAK and MTL, here is my proposal:

Pacioretty & Valiev for LAK 20th overall & Forbort & Anderson-Dolan 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, alfredoh2009 said:

With and the rummors of a trade between LAK and MTL, here is my proposal:

Pacioretty & Valiev for LAK 20th overall & Forbort & Anderson-Dolan 

Is Forbort a 1st pair LD ????   Otherwise, I don't see why we should trade Pacioretty for this package.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, JoeLassister said:

Is Forbort a 1st pair LD ????   Otherwise, I don't see why we should trade Pacioretty for this package.

For the draft pick and the center prospect

Fortbort can play with Petry. We cannot fill all the holes in one trade

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, alfredoh2009 said:

For the draft pick and the center prospect

Fortbort can play with Petry. We cannot fill all the holes in one trade

Why waste one of our best asset if it's not to fill  1C or 1LD ?
I would rather add to Pacioretty in order to achieve this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, JoeLassister said:

Why waste one of our best asset if it's not to fill  1C or 1LD ?
I would rather add to Pacioretty in order to achieve this.

Suggestions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, alfredoh2009 said:

For the draft pick and the center prospect

Fortbort can play with Petry. We cannot fill all the holes in one trade

Anderson-dolan is not a great centre prospect.

Hes a b or c level prospect

 

Hes not terrible but hes not what im after for pacioretty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The KIngs follower (Bernstein I think is name) said Vilardi is out of question for any trade.

He suggested maybe Muzzin and the A-Dolan kid for Pacioretty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about this for a trade 

 

To ducks 

Pacioretty 

 

To habs

Lindholm 

 

Ducks have 2 LD in Fowler and Lindholm and they could use more scoring.

 

We then could send a 2nd round pick to the sens for Pageau 

 

Sign Nash  or JvR to replace some of the goal scoring 

 

Nash /JVR - ? - Gallagher 

Domi  - Pageau  - Drouin 

Lehkonen  - danault  - Shaw 

Byron - Rose  - Scherbak 

 

Carr , Deslauriers , Hudon 

 

Lindholm  -Weber

Alzner  - Petry

Mete - Benn

 

Schlemko, Reilly 

 

Price 

Niemi 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We should go after Elias Lindholm and Hanafin at the same time, filling both a center and left D issue. 

 

Apprently lindholm trade is immenent 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would do 

 

Pacioretty, 2nd Round, Shaw 

 

for 

 

Muzzin and Kempe

 

Edit: If I knew with 100% certainty Pacioretty was leaving at the end of the year anyway

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Metallica said:

How about this for a trade 

 

To ducks 

Pacioretty 

 

To habs

Lindholm 

 

Ducks have 2 LD in Fowler and Lindholm and they could use more scoring.

 

We then could send a 2nd round pick to the sens for Pageau 

 

Sign Nash  or JvR to replace some of the goal scoring 

 

Nash /JVR - ? - Gallagher 

Domi  - Pageau  - Drouin 

Lehkonen  - danault  - Shaw 

Byron - Rose  - Scherbak 

 

Carr , Deslauriers , Hudon 

 

Lindholm  -Weber

Alzner  - Petry

Mete - Benn

 

Schlemko, Reilly 

 

Price 

Niemi 

I don’t get the fascination with pageau. He’s a third liner and an overpaid one at that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×