Meller93 Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 1 hour ago, Commandant said: I didn't say that. Is it possible. I'm sure Bergevin has asked what the price is. New Jersey is willing to listen. Trades are always possible. Is it worth over-reacting because he had an interview with the Habs. Doesn't mean that much, he's interviewed with over half the league. Sometimes teams do interviews incase he's a trade possibility now or in 3-4 years. They also like to ask about teammates, example Stelio Mattheos is ranked close to the Habs two second round picks, maybe they want a teammates insight on him. There are lots of reasons to interview. Not all are trades, though some are. I like the point about interviewing in case a trade opens up in years to come. Never thought about it beyond the draft, but that's a great way to get familiar with top talent. What do you think about Patrick versus Galchenyuk? Not saying he's the only option, but he's a logical trade candidate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 33 minutes ago, Meller93 said: I like the point about interviewing in case a trade opens up in years to come. Never thought about it beyond the draft, but that's a great way to get familiar with top talent. What do you think about Patrick versus Galchenyuk? Not saying he's the only option, but he's a logical trade candidate. I think given Galchenyuk's public struggles and the way the team had him on the fourth line, you'd have to add to the deal Something like Galchenyuk, Juulsen, 1st (25) for Patrick, 2nd (36) might be fair value. I'm not sure it helps you win now though, as Patrick will take time to grow and in the immediate future Galchenyuk is probably better. Its a move that when looked at in combination with the Weber/Subban trade doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Its spinning your wheels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DON Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 2 hours ago, Commandant said: Nolan Patrick met with 15 NHL teams (at least) in the last week. Isnt he actually visiting Montreal, NJ and Philly and being evaluated by Hab Doctors, which isn't same as simply combine interview is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 3 minutes ago, DON said: Isnt he actually visiting Montreal, NJ and Philly and being evaluated by Hab Doctors, which isn't same as simply combine interview is it? No its not the same. I'm still not sure it means any type of trade is imminent. Like I said, you can't do this stuff after a player is drafted as it becomes tampering. So now is your chance to do your due diligence for down the road. Patrick has had a lot of injuries, the Habs might just see having him looked at by doctors is due diligence for future. I won't read a whole lot into it, until a guy like Friedmann or Lebrun, or McKenzie says there is a chance of a trade happening, but thats just me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 7 minutes ago, DON said: Isnt he actually visiting Montreal, NJ and Philly and being evaluated by Hab Doctors, which isn't same as simply combine interview is it? New article just broke. He isn't meeting with Habs doctors. He is coming to Montreal to meet with Sponsors and Advertising people, and do a photo shoot. http://www.lapresse.ca/sports/hockey/201706/06/01-5104862-non-nolan-patrick-ne-rencontrera-pas-le-canadien.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DON Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 16 minutes ago, Commandant said: No its not the same. I'm still not sure it means any type of trade is imminent. Like I said, you can't do this stuff after a player is drafted as it becomes tampering. So now is your chance to do your due diligence for down the road. Patrick has had a lot of injuries, the Habs might just see having him looked at by doctors is due diligence for future. I won't read a whole lot into it, until a guy like Friedmann or Lebrun, or McKenzie says there is a chance of a trade happening, but thats just me. Agree 100%, just thought you thought was just combine interview and now seems as if was nothing at all anyways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meller93 Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 53 minutes ago, Commandant said: I think given Galchenyuk's public struggles and the way the team had him on the fourth line, you'd have to add to the deal Something like Galchenyuk, Juulsen, 1st (25) for Patrick, 2nd (36) might be fair value. I'm not sure it helps you win now though, as Patrick will take time to grow and in the immediate future Galchenyuk is probably better. Its a move that when looked at in combination with the Weber/Subban trade doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Its spinning your wheels. Yea in light of the win now Weber trade it really doesn't make a whole lot of sense does it. Then again, I do think of Patrick as a more Julien type centreman. I could be wrong, but does he not have more two-way potential than what is considered of Galchenyuk? Or am I getting mixed up with his power forward, physical side of his game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 20 minutes ago, Meller93 said: Yea in light of the win now Weber trade it really doesn't make a whole lot of sense does it. Then again, I do think of Patrick as a more Julien type centreman. I could be wrong, but does he not have more two-way potential than what is considered of Galchenyuk? Or am I getting mixed up with his power forward, physical side of his game? He's got more defensive potential than Galchenyuk. But he's also 18. He's gonna make rookie mistakes next year. he might be better down the road, but not right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stogey24 Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 I've read a few articles saying that Patrick will be a decent point producer, but not elite and that he's going to need some time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeLassister Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 Trading Galchenyuk for an 18 yo guy who's not Matthews or Eichel caliber is a move that you make when you clean the house for a complete rebuild through the draft. And this is not happening as long as Price, Weber and Pax are on the team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ehjay Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 I was kinda bored so I thought of a trade .... 2017: 1st round N. Beaulieu Vs. Jonas Brodin 2018: Conditional 3rd round (should NB not be picked and breaks 50pts nxt season) Good trade for both teams??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stogey24 Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 Marko Dano is a guy to watch.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
habs rule Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 5 hours ago, Stogey24 said: Marko Dano is a guy to watch.. Why? I don't know anything about him but I don't see anything in his stats that makes me warm and fuzzy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDriveFor25 Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 Seeing as it's a divisional opponent and we'd have to overpay.. thoughts about: Sergachev and McCarron and #25 for Drouin and #14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hab29RETIRED Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 49 minutes ago, TheDriveFor25 said: Seeing as it's a divisional opponent and we'd have to overpay.. thoughts about: Sergachev and McCarron and #25 for Drouin and #14 No bloody way. Julsson or Beaulieu, or even botha ong with McCarron sure. I wouldn't trade Drouin straight up for sergechev. We are rail thin on D that can actually move the puck on the team and in our prospect pool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeLassister Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 On 2017-06-10 at 5:51 PM, hab29RETIRED said: No bloody way. Julsson or Beaulieu, or even botha ong with McCarron sure. I wouldn't trade Drouin straight up for sergechev. We are rail thin on D that can actually move the puck on the team and in our prospect pool. We are also rail thin on F who can actually create offense on the team and in our prospect pool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ehjay Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Seems NJ Devils might thinking about drafting D? http://www.tvasports.ca/2017/06/10/un-defenseur-pour-les-devils-au-repechage What if the Habs offered up NB and Julsson? Would that be fair? Since they could move down past 5 and still maybe get Makar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machine of Loving Grace Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 2 hours ago, ehjay said: Seems NJ Devils might thinking about drafting D? http://www.tvasports.ca/2017/06/10/un-defenseur-pour-les-devils-au-repechage What if the Habs offered up NB and Julsson? Would that be fair? Since they could move down past 5 and still maybe get Makar If you give them Sergachev + 1st they might give you first overall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PMAC Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 On 2017-06-10 at 4:51 PM, hab29RETIRED said: No bloody way. Julsson or Beaulieu, or even botha ong with McCarron sure. I wouldn't trade Drouin straight up for sergechev. We are rail thin on D that can actually move the puck on the team and in our prospect pool. Sergechev and a 1st is a massive overpayment. Beaulieu and pick would be more like it. I would like to see Montreal clearly win a major trade for a change and they certainly will not if they give up Serg or Gally for Duchene? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ehjay Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 22 hours ago, Machine of Loving Grace said: If you give them Sergachev + 1st they might give you first overall. Seems a bit steep... If MB I would gun for Brodin for NB and Sherbak or some other prospect... Seems to me if there is no legit #1C heading this way then Micha should stay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ehjay Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 On 6/8/2017 at 2:12 PM, Stogey24 said: Marko Dano is a guy to watch.. he signed http://www.tsn.ca/jets-re-sign-f-dano-to-one-year-contract-1.777725 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machine of Loving Grace Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 7 hours ago, ehjay said: Seems a bit steep... Of course it is. You are trying to get the first overall pick. What you think they are going to settle on a 26th overall pick drafted in 2015 with no real accolades? If they want a top defenceman they can just trade down with a team around eighth overall and get extra to go with an 18 year old that's best in their draft. I'm expecting Bergevin to look for a reclamation project to fill the top six centre role. That way he doesn't lose a high prospect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lovett's Magnatones Posted June 14, 2017 Share Posted June 14, 2017 3 hours ago, Machine of Loving Grace said: Of course it is. You are trying to get the first overall pick. What you think they are going to settle on a 26th overall pick drafted in 2015 with no real accolades? If they want a top defenceman they can just trade down with a team around eighth overall and get extra to go with an 18 year old that's best in their draft. I'm expecting Bergevin to look for a reclamation project to fill the top six centre role. That way he doesn't lose a high prospect. Maybe Artem Anisomov? Not exactly a reclamation project, but he fits MB's Chicago 2009-2012 worshipping vision of the league. Eric Staal is another name I thought of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted June 14, 2017 Share Posted June 14, 2017 1 hour ago, Lovett's Magnatones said: Maybe Artem Anisomov? Not exactly a reclamation project, but he fits MB's Chicago 2009-2012 worshipping vision of the league. Eric Staal is another name I thought of. Anisimov is a guy who is around 40 points even playing on a line with Kane and Panarin. I think he's a definite possibility for Bergevin, and he's one guy i predict us to be in on. But its also not an acquisition that excites me. Staal would be a nice pickup as a stop gap. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xXx..CK..xXx Posted June 14, 2017 Share Posted June 14, 2017 Let's get Staal. I want a big center with skill and I guess both (Anisimov) those players fit that bill but I still think Staal has a higher ceiling. I also suggested Thornton awhile back but I'm not sure what his situation is in more than one way. He wasn't able to score much this season but Pacioretty may pot 80 with him by his side Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.