BCHabnut Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 1 minute ago, sbhatt said: Funny you said that...we were DAMN close to taking one...forget who it was now but they wisely slammed on the breaks and dove back for the bench. It was andreghetto. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toronthab Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 7 minutes ago, BCHabnut said: Yes. As long as the goalie is not in the crease, you can incidentally contact him into the corner of the rink. Thanks BC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chicoutimi Cucumber Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 The New York Referees suffered a tough loss tonight UP YOURS NHL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chicoutimi Cucumber Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 19 minutes ago, kuternoga said: When everyone is against you but your team won My sentiments exactly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huzer Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 I'm absolutely stunned at that interference non-call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toronthab Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 It could be that they thought it was Price's pad that snagged him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DON Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 Nice comeback. 5 points in last 3 games for Danault and Byron with another productive game also. 6-2-2 in last ten is pretty good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 12 hours ago, Machine of Loving Grace said: He left his feet from what I saw plus it was a blindside hit. He didn't hit the head but I'm sure Shaw wanted to. Wanting to is the reason for a penalty? As for leaving his feet, I don't think he did. Its besides the point though, the refs didn't call charging, they called interference. Which means they don't think he did leave his feet. Edit: Both feet are on the ice here at the time of contact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 9 hours ago, zumpano21 said: One for the trivia hounds: A few years back, our record with Markov in and out of the lineup was a steep contrast. Does that still hold? The goals against numbers are dramatically different. Basically 1.5 more against per game. Haven't really looked at the record. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chicoutimi Cucumber Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 2 hours ago, Commandant said: The goals against numbers are dramatically different. Basically 1.5 more against per game. Haven't really looked at the record. The injury to Markov was a franchise-changing event. It led, more or less directly, to Cammalleri wanting out, the collapse of 2013 and the fire-bombing of the Gauthier regime. At least we've moved along since then... Still, it's unsettling to think that a 38-year-old Markov is the absence that explains that goal differential. I prefer to think that the explanation is more a combination of that plus Price slumping (probably due to injury) and a bottom-pairing that is consistently below NHL calibre... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DON Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 23 minutes ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said: The injury to Markov was a franchise-changing event. It led, more or less directly, to Cammalleri wanting out, the collapse of 2013 and the fire-bombing of the Gauthier regime. At least we've moved along since then... Still, it's unsettling to think that a 38-year-old Markov is the absence that explains that goal differential. I prefer to think that the explanation is more a combination of that plus Price slumping (probably due to injury) and a bottom-pairing that is consistently below NHL calibre... Don't hate Redman-Barberio pairing as much as Johnston with anyone and thought 3rd pairing was OK yesterday, but obviously Markov is head and shoulders above all three of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commandant Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 1 hour ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said: The injury to Markov was a franchise-changing event. It led, more or less directly, to Cammalleri wanting out, the collapse of 2013 and the fire-bombing of the Gauthier regime. At least we've moved along since then... Still, it's unsettling to think that a 38-year-old Markov is the absence that explains that goal differential. I prefer to think that the explanation is more a combination of that plus Price slumping (probably due to injury) and a bottom-pairing that is consistently below NHL calibre... I don't think its all Markov... there are injuries up front leading to less experienced forwards, there is an effect on the defence having some below NHL calibre players playing back there, there is a slumping Weber who has had some issues defensively, as has Beaulieu-Petry lately, and most clearly and importantly a slumping price. Markov being out is a factor though. Its hard to say how much of one though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habsfan Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 I must admit I'm starting to worry a little about Carey. His Save% has gone from .931 to .921 in one week! I'm glad to see the Habs win last night's game, but I'm a little sad to see Carey's stats plummet the way they've been for the past month. I would like to think that Carey is the best goalie in the league, and for that to be true, he should have the best stats of any goalie(or close to the best stats), but he's 11th in G.A.A. and 14th in Save%. Let's hope that when Markov returns it'll help our defensive zone coverage! LIke I said earlier, I'm really impressed by last night's win. The Habs came back three times to win this one, on top of the fact that the Refs were horrible! Good job boys! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMMR Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 No need to worry about Carey, his game is fine. A little slump is no big deal unless it's in April-June. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlbalr Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Kerry Fraser on the Price/Hayes play: http://www.kerryfraser.com/single-post/2017/01/16/Incidental-Contact-with-Carey-Prices-Pad-Results-in-Rick-Nash-Goal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.