Jump to content

10 Thoughts


Recommended Posts

One thought on the ten thoughts article:

garbage.

 

This “writer” continues to bring down the overall content level of the site. He sucks.

His blatant hate-on for Anderson undermines any credibility in player critique and his articles are worthless.

Every article he takes a dig at Anderson who was definitely not the problem last night, was one of the few consistently noticeable Habs.

 

Piss poor defence who cannot clear the zone with authority is an ongoing problem. Soft chips up the boards where they don’t make a pass and also aren’t clear ong the zone is happening over and over.

Baron, Harris and Steiner all guilty of it many time over past handful of games.  Mathewson continues to be allowed to play piss poor defensive hockey because he generates some rushes, while constantly getting himself out of position, losing attackers in his own zone and generally being a poor veteran presence.

 

These ten thoughts articles are a bad replacement for the general

post-game review and this current writer is the worst of them all.  He glorifies mistakes and cannot hide his bias towards some players.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the 10 thoughts articles.

 

I dislike posts that make personal attacks at writers, especially someone who is trying and providing you free content.

 

If you dont like it, you dont have to read it.  There is lots of content on the internet, search a little and find something you like.  Or better yet, start your own site and see how hard it is.  Its not easy, especially when you misspell, not one, not two, but three players names in a short post like this... Barron, Matheson, and Struble.

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hockeyrealist said:

One thought on the ten thoughts article:

garbage.

 

This “writer” continues to bring down the overall content level of the site. He sucks.

His blatant hate-on for Anderson undermines any credibility in player critique and his articles are worthless.

Every article he takes a dig at Anderson who was definitely not the problem last night, was one of the few consistently noticeable Habs.

 

Piss poor defence who cannot clear the zone with authority is an ongoing problem. Soft chips up the boards where they don’t make a pass and also aren’t clear ong the zone is happening over and over.

Baron, Harris and Steiner all guilty of it many time over past handful of games.  Mathewson continues to be allowed to play piss poor defensive hockey because he generates some rushes, while constantly getting himself out of position, losing attackers in his own zone and generally being a poor veteran presence.

 

These ten thoughts articles are a bad replacement for the general

post-game review and this current writer is the worst of them all.  He glorifies mistakes and cannot hide his bias towards some players.

 

 

 

First of all, many posters have commented that they like the feature. Secondly, the writers on this site are volunteers, so launching a whole thread to crap on one of them is totally out of order. Not cool.

 

Thirdly, refer to the above note about “volunteers.” If you hate it so much, then rather than attack the work of others, step up and start doing some features yourself and give us all the benefit of your superior prose and insight. 

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Habs Fan in Edmonton, Commandant and The Chicoutimi Cucumber said.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hockeyrealist said:

One thought on the ten thoughts article:

garbage.

 

This “writer” continues to bring down the overall content level of the site. He sucks.

His blatant hate-on for Anderson undermines any credibility in player critique and his articles are worthless.

Every article he takes a dig at Anderson who was definitely not the problem last night, was one of the few consistently noticeable Habs.

 

Piss poor defence who cannot clear the zone with authority is an ongoing problem. Soft chips up the boards where they don’t make a pass and also aren’t clear ong the zone is happening over and over.

Baron, Harris and Steiner all guilty of it many time over past handful of games.  Mathewson continues to be allowed to play piss poor defensive hockey because he generates some rushes, while constantly getting himself out of position, losing attackers in his own zone and generally being a poor veteran presence.

 

These ten thoughts articles are a bad replacement for the general

post-game review and this current writer is the worst of them all.  He glorifies mistakes and cannot hide his bias towards some players.

 

 


You keep posting these rude, inappropriate comments that are nonsense. 
 

Anderson deserves every bit of criticism. He gets 4-5 prime scoring chances every single game and converts on zero. Give Ylonen his spot. 
 

This site is full of intelligent commentary and articles, including the 10 thoughts. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This is the 'bias' you disagree with? 

Sees pretty bang-on to me.

 

  • Anderson was lucky to get coincidental minors in a scrum with Jan Rutta near the midway mark.
  • Much like Josh Anderson up front, Matheson is guilty of a long line of head-scratching plays on a nightly basis.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Neech said:

Steiner has sure been getting a free ride lately.

Da bum! that Steiner.

 

trade him for a bag of pucks  already ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, alfredoh2009 said:

Da bum! that Steiner.

 

trade him for a bag of pucks  already ...

Which one is with the Habs?
image.png
 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GHT120 said:

Which one is with the Habs?

I think it is Humble Scotty, but he is just the Habs steroid consultant, not actually on roster.

Image result for steiners WWF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DON said:

I think it is Humble Scotty, but he is just the Habs steroid consultant, not actually on roster.

Image result for steiners WWF

Sadly, I can recall wehn Scott was a talented wrestler and not a 'roid rassler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...