Jump to content

Game #10, Nov. 2, Montreal @ Arizona, 10pm EST


TurdBurglar

Recommended Posts

Montreal Canadiens (5-2-2) - 12 pts

Arizona Coyotes (4-4-1) - 9 pts

Caufield - Suzuki - Harvey-Pinard
Anderson - Newhook - Slafkovsky
Pearson - Monahan - Gallagher
Armia - Evans - Pezzetta

 

Matheson - Barron
Harris - Kovacevic
Xhekaj - Guhle

 

Montembeault

Keller – Hayton – Schmaltz
Maccelli – Bjugstad – Crouse
Carcone – Cooley – Boyd
O’Brien – McBain – Kerfoot

 

Moser – Durzi
Valimaki – Dumba
Stetcher – Brown

 

Ingram

 

 

Projected lineups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I so want to see Slaf get points in this game with Colley getting none.   Slaf is certainly due and its time for Cooley to cool right off.  

 

D'oh.  Barron saved a goal yet caused one at the same time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I missed all but the last 2 minutes of the first.  I don't know what's worse, the tight camera angles or Craig Button.  Button started talking and stopped mid-sentence near the end of the period, and never did finish his sentence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, IN THE HEARTS OF MEN said:

Monahan again... this guy is saving our season thus far...

 

He certainly isn't hurting the team, but I believe Pearson might be as important or even more so.  He's a 3rd liner thats putting up a lot of points.  Monohans production is more expected of a 1st or 2nd liner.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sir_Boagalott said:

 

He certainly isn't hurting the team, but I believe Pearson might be as important or even more so.  He's a 3rd liner thats putting up a lot of points.  Monohans production is more expected of a 1st or 2nd liner.

 

 

Pearson has been very good, but Monahan has been huge so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BCHabnut said:

Allen is having another game. This team sure allows high danger chances

They do, but at the same time, they are far better than last year at taking away the pass.  So at least Allen can focus on the shooter in a high-danger spot, instead of the shooter and a potential pass.  Baby steps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TurdBurglar said:

They do, but at the same time, they are far better than last year at taking away the pass.  So at least Allen can focus on the shooter in a high-danger spot, instead of the shooter and a potential pass.  Baby steps.

That's a good point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TurdBurglar said:

I'm not even sure the Keller hit on Matheson should of been a penalty.

 

I believe that statement is more applicable to WiFi's x-checking penalty.  The ref should have given the Yotes player 1 too.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sir_Boagalott said:

 

I believe that statement is more applicable to WiFi's x-checking penalty.  The ref should have given the Yotes player 1 too.  

Pretty sure that was the make-up call for the Keller penalty.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Slaf made a few decent plays in the third. Granted, the standard for him is so low that a few decent plays constitute a step in the right direction. He's still so raw, but he seems noticeably less clueless than he was last year. It'll be a long runway for him; we're really targeting five years down the line.

 

A regulation loss is not bad in the scheme of things. At least we're not getting walloped like the Sharks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Prime Minister Koivu said:

Why does Marty continue to keep Newhook, Slaf, Anderson together?

 

 I know the RHP injury caused some changes there but seriously Marty the second line is terrible and you need to do something about it. 

Coincidentally, Arpon Basu posted a story on The Athletic yesterday about playing with balance and how he wants all four lines to have a balanced attack (and defence). The second line is the one that’s struggling with this.

 

St. Louis said he remains confident in the line and is going to stick with it. And he refused to isolate Slafkovský from his linemates. The line needs to be better, and he will continue working on how it can get better. And once the line is playing more within the structure of how the team plays, and if Slafkovský continues to struggle at that point, then maybe the questions on his game will be more justified.

But for now, he is just one part of a more general problem with his more veteran linemates.

 

 

So, he is not about to change this.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...