Jump to content

2024-25 Montreal Canadiens discussion thread


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, DON said:

Most on here predicted a lottery finish and no playoffs. And 0% thought would win the cup, safe bet i think.

Currently tied for 29th.

 

Overall we are 1 point out of last but only 4 points out of 13th. It's a log jam but it's early. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said:

MSL isn't doing himself any favours by not mentioning it every chance he gets - because, to me, a lot of what we're seeing can be explained by players struggling to apply the new system.

But he tends to not throw his players under the bus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GHT120 said:

But he tends to not throw his players under the bus.

 

Agreed and that is the correct long term approach to take. He doesn't want to lose the room. Blaming the players would be a sign of desperation and would not look good on him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GHT120 said:

But he tends to not throw his players under the bus.

 

3 hours ago, Habs Fan in Edmonton said:

 

Agreed and that is the correct long term approach to take. He doesn't want to lose the room. Blaming the players would be a sign of desperation and would not look good on him. 

 

Totally a minor point, but you can reference 'learning the system' without throwing any individual under the bus. You just say general things like 'we still need to work on internalizing the new system a bit,' that kind of stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cant hurt i guess.

 

"On Monday, the Canadiens brought in former NHL centreman Marc Bureau to work with the team’s centres for more than 30 minutes on faceoffs before the start of practice in Brossard."

Canadiens bring in former NHLer Marc Bureau to help with faceoffs | Montreal Gazette

 

 

“Honestly, I don’t have concern,” Canadiens head coach Martin St. Louis said after practice Monday in Brossard when asked what his biggest concern is about his team so far. “I just got to stay the course with this transition in what we’re doing right now. We’re learning to win and, obviously, there’s been a lot of focus on the defensive side of things and the risk-taking. So I’m not concerned and I know exactly our offensive game has dipped and I know why. So I’m not concerned. It’s a little bit of see-saw a little bit and we got to find that right balance. … That’s where we are.”

Stu Cowan: St. Louis isn't concerned about Canadiens, but he should be | Montreal Gazette

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most seem pleased with move, now hope Kapanen lights up the SHL.:D

 

Oliver Kapanen returns to Sweden to play more | Radio-Canada

 

"It's still too early to tell," said St-Louis. If you had asked me that 12 or 13 months ago, I would have said it's a centre. But we won't really know until Dach has fully regained his game."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, when do we stand back and say, "in the mix." Isn't a reality this year. Game 20? Game 30 or 40? I'm ready to call it now. My hope for this season is development of key players. Mostly Ghule, Hutson, Struble, an Barron.  If Barron or Mailloux can tighten up their own end, I'm still excited about the future. But for now I think it's time to switch from, let's learn how to win, back to let's learn the game and develop individuals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BCHabnut said:

So, when do we stand back and say, "in the mix." Isn't a reality this year. Game 20? Game 30 or 40? I'm ready to call it now. My hope for this season is development of key players. Mostly Ghule, Hutson, Struble, an Barron.  If Barron or Mailloux can tighten up their own end, I'm still excited about the future. But for now I think it's time to switch from, let's learn how to win, back to let's learn the game and develop individuals. 

 

Way too early to call it. I think you can develop individuals and win at the same time. They are not mutually exclusive events. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BCHabnut said:

So, when do we stand back and say, "in the mix." Isn't a reality this year. Game 20? Game 30 or 40? I'm ready to call it now. My hope for this season is development of key players. Mostly Ghule, Hutson, Struble, an Barron.  If Barron or Mailloux can tighten up their own end, I'm still excited about the future. But for now I think it's time to switch from, let's learn how to win, back to let's learn the game and develop individuals. 

Given that the plan was to replace Monahan by a player coming off (essentially) a full-season injury (Dach) and they moved a solid 3rd pairing defenceman to make room for youngsters with at most 120 NHL games played, I felt that was always the base plan ... getting Laine inspired some hope of "in the mix" but then that went

image.png

I gave up "in the mix" when Laine went down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Outstanding article about the different defensive systems used in the NHL. 
 

Deep dive, with video and evidence of why Montreal struggles with Hybrid defence. 
 

Edmonton switched to hybrid defence at the beginning of last season and that led to a coaching change and subsequent change back to zone defence. 
 

Go back to zone defence Marty. Habs were one of the best teams 5 on 5 and now we have brutally awful defensive and offensive stats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Matheson the worst defender on the team?

He was responsible for several 2-1s yesterday

Felt bad for Guhle, if wasnt Matheson, it was Newhook or some other forward screwing up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Prime Minister Koivu said:

Edmonton switched to hybrid defence at the beginning of last season and that led to a coaching change and subsequent change back to zone defence. 
 

Go back to zone defence Marty. Habs were one of the best teams 5 on 5 and now we have brutally awful defensive and offensive stats. 

 

Edmonton was in "win now" mode and the change was logical ... if MSL, HuGo et al believe that the hybrid system is what they want to be playing when they "exit" the rebuild and start "win now" mode then keep the system and help the youngsters learn it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GHT120 said:

 

Edmonton was in "win now" mode and the change was logical ... if MSL, HuGo et al believe that the hybrid system is what they want to be playing when they "exit" the rebuild and start "win now" mode then keep the system and help the youngsters learn it.


I think Habs management is chasing a trend here. 
 

4 out of 5 of the last cup winners used hybrid defence. 
 

That doesn’t make that system a magic bullet necessarily 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a way, this is a test of organizational sang-froid. You made a change. The team is struggling to adapt to it. If you truly believe that this is the way the team will need to play when it’s time to win, then NOW is the time to go through those growing pains. The last thing we want is to have our Cup window opening, then regress because we flipped the system.

 

But the other consideration is: what if the adaptation struggles lead to a cascading sense of negativity and a loss of confidence among the young players who keep failing at it? Does that then grind against your wider organizational goals of player development?

 

And there is a third factor. MSL seems very good at working with individual players, but what if he is just not very good at communicating/teaching systems? In this case, have you made the right decision, but left in place the wrong guy to execute it?

 

Hard to sort all this out. But I would say, 14 games is maybe not enough. The Oil went back to their earlier system because they were in an absolute win-now crisis. That ain’t us.

 

Bare minimum, I think the Habs and MSL need to do a better job of communicating that adjusting to the new system is a ‘process’ and that there will continue to be growing pains for a while yet. Get ahead of the fan/media narrative that the sky is falling. Really, they should have been emphasizing this from day one, rather than saying we were going to ‘be in the mix.’

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said:

In a way, this is a test of organizational sang-froid. You made a change. The team is struggling to adapt to it. If you truly believe that this is the way the team will need to play when it’s time to win, then NOW is the time to go through those growing pains. The last thing we want is to have our Cup window opening, then regress because we flipped the system.

 

But the other consideration is: what if the adaptation struggles lead to a cascading sense of negativity and a loss of confidence among the young players who keep failing at it? Does that then grind against your wider organizational goals of player development?

 

And there is a third factor. MSL seems very good at working with individual players, but what if he is just not very good at communicating/teaching systems? In this case, have you made the right decision, but left in place the wrong guy to execute it?

 

Hard to sort all this out. But I would say, 14 games is maybe not enough. The Oil went back to their earlier system because they were in an absolute win-now crisis. That ain’t us.

 

Bare minimum, I think the Habs and MSL need to do a better job of communicating that adjusting to the new system is a ‘process’ and that there will continue to be growing pains for a while yet. Get ahead of the fan/media narrative that the sky is falling. Really, they should have been emphasizing this from day one, rather than saying we were going to ‘be in the mix.’


Very smart post here 👍

 

I wonder what the data says about efficacy of each style?

 

Is learning a challenging new system worth a .02% decrease in goals against for example? 
 

I think Marty is a very stubborn person so that causes me a small amount of concern. 
 

I am also of the growing opinion that not replacing Burrows in one capacity or another is a mistake. Perhaps an experienced defensive coach could teach the new system more effectively. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said:

In a way, this is a test of organizational sang-froid. You made a change. The team is struggling to adapt to it. If you truly believe that this is the way the team will need to play when it’s time to win, then NOW is the time to go through those growing pains. The last thing we want is to have our Cup window opening, then regress because we flipped the system.

 

But the other consideration is: what if the adaptation struggles lead to a cascading sense of negativity and a loss of confidence among the young players who keep failing at it? Does that then grind against your wider organizational goals of player development?

 

And there is a third factor. MSL seems very good at working with individual players, but what if he is just not very good at communicating/teaching systems? In this case, have you made the right decision, but left in place the wrong guy to execute it?

 

Hard to sort all this out. But I would say, 14 games is maybe not enough. The Oil went back to their earlier system because they were in an absolute win-now crisis. That ain’t us.

 

Bare minimum, I think the Habs and MSL need to do a better job of communicating that adjusting to the new system is a ‘process’ and that there will continue to be growing pains for a while yet. Get ahead of the fan/media narrative that the sky is falling. Really, they should have been emphasizing this from day one, rather than saying we were going to ‘be in the mix.’

 

Excellent post looking at the pros and cons of implementing a new system. Has it caused some of the young players to take a step backward?  Maybe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Habs Fan in Edmonton said:

 

Excellent post looking at the pros and cons of implementing a new system. Has it caused some of the young players to take a step backward?  Maybe. 

 

Is it a step backward to take two steps forward? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...