Jump to content

Should Dominique Ducharme be our head coach next year?


REV-G

Recommended Posts

This thread isn't primarily about Marc Bergevin and what his future should hold although you can't discuss the coach without overlapping into what he was given to succeed with. But I thought this would be the right time to begin to ask about our head coach position for next season.

 

I think we would all say we are disappointed at the results we've had over this shortened season. With the additions MB made in the offseason many believed this team would challenge for first place in the Canadian division. I heard well known hockey insiders say back in January that Montreal should challenge for top spot, so it wasn't just us diehard fans believing and hoping for great things. We started out great, as we've done before, and then the wheels seem to fall off from what may have been our not realistic lofty expectations (hindsight).

 

Is it the team? Is the older core possibly past their "best by" date?  Or is it the coaching, or a combination of both. I believe MB brought in what was needed in the offseason. But maybe it's too little too late. Maybe our older core really has declined that quickly? 

 

The coach: My sense is that Dominic has not risen to the occasion and has not surpassed or done as well as his fired predecessor. Is is because he inherited a system that wasn't his, or was it the brutal schedule with little to no practice time, or the many injuries to key people? Probably all of that contributed. 

 

Here are my takes on the coach. Nothing personal, I'm sure he's a great guy, just a realistic look and a fan's evaluation at the head coach position. I have this sense that's he's not ready or maybe not suited to be the head guy at this point in the NHL. I feel, for the first time in a long while, the opposite regarding Toronto's head coach. Maybe not a fair comparison given the talent disperity between the two teams. But I have been impressed with Toronto's game plan, their execution and most importantly, they all seem to know their roles and what they are expected to do. They look well organized, for me that means well coached. 

 

So I don't think DD should be our head coach next year. Would it work to bring up Joel Bouchard and put DD back as an assistant? I don't know. 

 

On another note, maybe it's time to trade off the older guys and spend 2-3 years letting our young guys grow and begin a genuine rebuild.

 

With other teams working hard to constantly improve we can't just sit in no man's land, in the middle of the pack, and not do something dramatic, one way or the other. 

 

That's what I think.  Agree or disagree?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expected the Habs to finish 3rd in the division, so they fell one spot short of that by 4 points. I was happy with the off season but I am not sure why it should have led to 1st in the division predictions when Edmonton has players like McDavid and Draisaitl, and Toronto has a player like Auston Matthews.

 

The players we acquired were second tier level compared to them, although Toffoli had a superstar worthy goal scoring season. I am also sure some people we could take a top heavy team with our “roll 4 lines” depth. 

 

Long story short, the Habs have played this season to about my expectation, though I do hope they continue to put up a fight versus the Leafs and prolong this season.

 

Regardless of the outcome of the series, I was never a fan of the Ducharme hiring so would not mind it if someone else is introduced. The problem is I don’t exactly have a specific solution as to who I’d prefer. I’ll let the higher powers work on that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think so. He seems to have uninspired the uninspired even further.

 

I’d hire a new coach - who that is I don’t know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, TheDriveFor25 said:

I don’t think so. He seems to have uninspired the uninspired even further.

 

I’d hire a new coach - who that is I don’t know. 

Torts ... he might love the challenge of learning French so he can abuse media in two languages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t see any case for bringing DD back. True, he has not had the time he normally would have to put his stamp on the group. But more telling to me is that he *did* have a good long break after the season to work with the team and they still look like human garbage. There are no signs of improvement.

 

The deeper question is what to replace him with. I dunno, is there any hope of Vigneault being fired? Do  we *really* want to bring up Bouchard, a guy who is doing well with the young players and has far less big-league coaching experience than DD? Who else is out there who is bilingual and might do they job?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said:

... The deeper question is what to replace him with. I dunno, is there any hope of Vigneault being fired? Do  we *really* want to bring up Bouchard, a guy who is doing well with the young players and has far less big-league coaching experience than DD? Who else is out there who is bilingual and might do they job?

Also with Bouchard, does he want to be a NHL coach or in management?

 

Two, possibly three, coaches who speak French were included by ESPN a couple of weeks ago among their 5 top NHL HC candidates ... Patrick Roy and Pascal Vincent ... the potential third is Rikard Gronborg, ZCS Lions head coach and longtime head coach of the Swedish national team (lots of Europeans are multi-lingual) ... their "up&coming coaches" list included Louis Robitaille, Andre Tourigny and another potential, Troy Mann (NB native, which has a significant French speaking population) ... in the final group of "coaches they would like to see in the NHL" was another potential, Jukka Jalonen (another European and Finland's head coach).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, GHT120 said:

Also with Bouchard, does he want to be a NHL coach or in management?

 

Two, possibly three, coaches who speak French were included by ESPN a couple of weeks ago among their 5 top NHL HC candidates ... Patrick Roy and Pascal Vincent ... the potential third is Rikard Gronborg, ZCS Lions head coach and longtime head coach of the Swedish national team (lots of Europeans are multi-lingual) ... their "up&coming coaches" list included Louis Robitaille, Andre Tourigny and another potential, Troy Mann (NB native, which has a significant French speaking population) ... in the final group of "coaches they would like to see in the NHL" was another potential, Jukka Jalonen (another European and Finland's head coach).

 

I rather like the idea of bringing in a European coach. They might have different assumptions and ideas - the Habs need some fresh thinking for sure, and it would be good to see us actually being innovative. It would also open up some new options going forward, as opposed to fixating on "bilingual" as a synonym for francophone, which does narrow the talent pool. If they Habs are condemned to hire bilingual coaches, and anglo North American hockey people refuse to learn French, then perhaps the Canadiens should think much harder about Europe as a potential source of coaching and managerial talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the bizarre challenge to sticking with Eric Staal, to now apparently choosing Gustafsson over Romanov, it doesn't seem like Ducharme calls all the shots that a coach normally does, and instead is an extension of Bergevin.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GHT120 said:

Torts ... he might love the challenge of learning French so he can abuse media in two languages.

 

I know it'll never happen but just picturing Tortorella going on a rant in French made me laugh.  He might put some of the media in their place too and wouldn't put up with some of the nonsense.  

 

1 hour ago, Habsfan89 said:

If Bergevin is staying on as GM he will be our coach because he was hand pick to be CJ replacement.  If Bergevin gets fired "let go" then he won't be back. 

 

This is my take as well.

 

1 hour ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said:

The deeper question is what to replace him with. I dunno, is there any hope of Vigneault being fired? Do  we *really* want to bring up Bouchard, a guy who is doing well with the young players and has far less big-league coaching experience than DD? Who else is out there who is bilingual and might do they job?

 

Chuck Fletcher in Philly has ruled out changes to the coaching staff which takes Vigneault and Therrien (just to put some minds at ease) off the table.

 

For the sake of this, let's say there's a GM/coaching change.  If whoever comes in doesn't think Bouchard is ready but thinks he will be down the road, then they might be looking at a transitional coach.  Someone who will make an impact but have a short shelf life.  That would put Bob Hartley and Guy Boucher into play, people that could instill a certain structure but moving on from them a few years later wouldn't be a bad thing.

 

Of course, if it's Patrick Roy as GM, he'll probably name himself as coach, vice-president of hockey operations, alternate governor, and a whole bunch of other titles he's not remotely qualified to do.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • dlbalr changed the title to Should Dominique Ducharme be our head coach next year?

I said he should get time to implement a system.

 

He had a week to work on things between the end of the season and playoffs 

 

Our pp is worse

Our breakout is worse

Zone entries are worse 

Pk is worse.

 

This is him getting practice time.

 

Add bizarre personnel decisions and Im done.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Habsfan89 said:

If Bergevin is staying on as GM he will be our coach because he was hand pick to be CJ replacement.  If Bergevin gets fired "let go" then he won't be back. 

I think convenience played a big part in that pick. Although I was not in the room when Bergevin made his case to Molson!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Chicoutimi Cucumber said:

I rather like the idea of bringing in a European coach. They might have different assumptions and ideas - the Habs need some fresh thinking for sure, and it would be good to see us actually being innovative. It would also open up some new options going forward, as opposed to fixating on "bilingual" as a synonym for francophone, which does narrow the talent pool. If they Habs are condemned to hire bilingual coaches, and anglo North American hockey people refuse to learn French, then perhaps the Canadiens should think much harder about Europe as a potential source of coaching and managerial talent.

I agree with this thinking. Whether the Habs are willing to take the leap is another matter.

 

Mind you, the Blue Jackets' choice of Kekalainen, the first European GM, has not been working out so badly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Prime Minister Koivu said:

We all know that our only option is to rehire Therrien or perhaps Carbo

Jean Perron is still available is he not?  Would LOVE to hear Chris Nilan's reaction were that to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...